Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Age, Gender & Gender Identities

Reports

Displaying 861 - 870 of 1037. 10 per page. Page 87.

Advanced Search

Dynamics of Children's Movement Among the AFDC, Medicaid, and Foster Care Programs Prior to Welfare Reform: 1995–1996

Prepared by: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago Center for Social Services Research, University of California, Berkeley School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill American Institutes for Research, Prime Contractor
Report to Congress

Indicators of Welfare Dependence: Annual Report to Congress, 2000

Prepared by Staff of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Acknowledgements

Advancing States' Child Indicator Initiatives: Promotional Indicators Forum

A Summary of a Meeting Attended by Grantees of the Advancing States' Child Indicator Initiatives Project and the STATES Initiative/Family Support America Project Saint Paul, February 3 & 4, 2000

Informal Caregivers of Disabled Elders with Long-Term Care Insurance

  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The Federal Role in the Move Toward Consumer Direction

This article is intended to provide historical perspective on the Federal Government's involvement in the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation as an example of the federal role in consumer direction. Specifically, it describes how previous research and analysis led to DALTCP's interest in sponsoring this social experiment and shaped our thinking about its purpose and design.

Trends in the Well-Being of America's Children and Youth, 2000

AcknowledgmentsThis report, and its earlier editions, would not have been possible without the substantial support of the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics whose member agencies provided data and carefully reviewed relevant sections.