Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Frozen at $2,000 Since 1986: The Coverage of Non-Recurring Adoption Expenses Has Lost Two-Thirds of Its Purchasing Power Over 40 Years

Publication Date
Authors
Administration for children and Families: Alex J. Adams and Cody Inman
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation: Kaitlyn Jones

KEY POINTS

  • Coverage of non-recurring adoption expenses can help reduce upfront adoption costs for families – covering expenses like legal fees, court costs, home studies, and necessary transportation, food, and lodging – supporting permanency for children with special needs.
  • A family receiving $2,000 in 1986 had almost three times the buying power of a family receiving the same amount in Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) – yet the maximum amount for non-recurring adoption expenses has remained fixed at $2,000 per child (with up to $1,000 being reimbursed by the federal government) for nearly 40 years, since 1986. 
  • From FY19 to FY25, the percentage of children exiting foster care to adoption remained fairly consistent, between 25 and 27 percent. During this time there was also a 33 percent decline in the total number of adoptions which is reflective of an overall drop in the number of children entering foster care – meaning there are fewer children in the system overall, and therefore fewer children exiting foster care through any pathway, including adoption.  
  • In FY24, 47,335 children exited foster care to adoption. An estimated 90 percent of those children would qualify as “special needs,” yet many of these families did not access the non-recurring adoption expenses benefit.
  • An exploratory analysis suggests that raising the cap from $2,000 to $2,500 might have increased the ceiling for FY24 federal reimbursement costs by about three percent, and raising it to $3,000 might have increased costs by about six percent; both estimates are lower than what the federal government actually reimbursed in several recent fiscal years. 

*This content is in the process of Section 508 review. If you need immediate assistance accessing this content, please submit a request to Amanda Benton, Amanda.Benton@hhs.gov. Content will be updated pending the outcome of the Section 508 review.

 

Product Type
ASPE Issue Brief
Populations
Children