This Brief is available on the Internet at:http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/boys/Findings1/brief.shtml
Printer Friendly Version in PDF Format (22 pages)
- A Look at Boys in America
- In Brief: Facts About How Boys Are Doing
- What Works for Boys?
- What Works for Boys
A Look at Boys in America
Many adolescent boys are doing well. They graduate from high school, make healthy choices, and reach adulthood prepared for the world of work and the responsibilities of family. For young men like these, opportunities have never been greater.
For some boys, the transition to adulthood is more difficult. Some American boys become victims of crime or commit crimes themselves. Some abuse substances at a young age or suffer from mental health problems such as depression. Some do poorly in school or drop out. And often, there are disparities among boys based on race and ethnicity, family structure, socioeconomic status, and the places where they live.
The challenges boys face have not gone unnoticed by scholars, popular media, and the public. Recent headlines have asserted that there is a problem with boys, a boys crisis, and a new gender gap between boys and girls. But not everyone agrees. Some say that the toughest problems are faced only by subgroups of boys, such as African American and Hispanic boys; boys whose parents neglect them, abuse drugs or alcohol, are unemployed, or suffer from mental health problems; and boys with mental health problems such as conduct disorder, bipolar disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
This brief sets aside the debate to present research-based information about the strengths that make boys likely to succeed and the risks, or challenges, that increase the likelihood that they will struggle. It does not make an effort to compare boys to girls; it does not intend to imply that an issue for boys isnt also relevant for girls. In fact, research shows that many of the same risk and protective factors, as well as interventions, may be relevant for both boys and girls.
Rather, this brief uses research-based information to highlight the positive impact that caring adults in families, schools, and communities can have on the well-being of boys and young men and the concrete steps they can take to help the boys and young men in their lives.
[ Go to Contents ]
In Brief: Facts About How Boys Are Doing
Theres both good news and bad news about how boys in America are faring.
Boys are doing better than they did a decade or more ago across a variety of indicators, including juvenile justice involvement, dropout rates, and substance use.
- Today, boys commit fewer property crimes, such as burglary, car theft, and arson, than they did in the late 1980s.(1)
- Boys smoking rates are lower today than in the mid- to late 1990s. Their drinking rates have also declined.(2)
- Since 1995, boys dropout rates have fallen.(3)
- Between 1994 and 2004, fewer boys between the ages of 10 and 18 have died each year.(4) (Boys are most often killed in accidents, such as car crashes, followed by homicide and suicide.)
- Boys are using their time constructively: One study found that nearly half of high school senior boys play a sport, more than a quarter take part in community affairs or volunteer at least once or twice per month, more than a quarter are part of a school club or activity, and about one-fifth play music or do other performing arts.(5)
- A greater percentage of high school senior boys volunteered their time in 2006 than in the early 1990s.(6)
However, boys are still facing challenges in many areas:
- In 2004, almost three-quarters of young people prosecuted in juvenile courts were boys.(7) Their most common law-violating behaviors were vandalism, theft, and assault.(8)
- From 1997 to 2003, around 85 percent of all juveniles in residential placement were boys.(9)
- More than 1 out of every 8 tenth grade boys surveyed in 2006 had smoked at least one cigarette in the previous month.(10)
- About 1 in every 6 eighth grade boys surveyed in 2006 had drunk alcohol in the previous month.(11)
- Nearly 40 percent of twelfth grade boys surveyed in 2006 had used illegal drugs in the past year.(12)
- While adolescent boys report depression less frequently than girls, depressed boys are more resistant to treatment and more likely to commit suicide.(13)
- While overall dropout rates have declined, in 2004, boys still represented over half (56 percent) of school dropouts ages 16 to 24.(14)
- Almost twice as many boys as girls ages 3 to 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD.(15)
- The employment rate for high school boys between the ages of 16 and 18 dropped from 33 percent in the 1995-1996 school year to 25 percent in the 2003-2004 school year.(16)
- In 2006, 7 percent of boys were out of school and unemployed.(17)
- A boy is more likely to be a victim of a serious violent crime, such as assault, robbery, and homicide, as he gets older: 15- to 19-year-old boys are much more often victims of those crimes than are 10- to 14-year-old boys.(18),(19)
Research also shows that specific subpopulations of boys are experiencing particular struggles:
- From 1995 through 2005, American Indian/Alaska Native boys ages 10 to 18 consistently had higher rates of suicide and death by motor vehicle crashes than White, African American, and Hispanic boys.(20)
- In 2004, the homicide rate for African American teen boys was 55 per 100,000. Thats more than double the homicide rate for Hispanic boys, nearly 4 times the rate for American Indian boys, and nearly 20 times the rate for non-Hispanic White boys.(21)
- Although racial disparity in the juvenile justice system is declining, the violent crime arrest rate for African American juveniles was still four times that of White juveniles in 2003.(22)
- African American and Hispanic adolescents have improved their performance on standardized tests over the last 20 years; however, their achievement continues to be lower than that of their White peers.(23)
In 2004, 7 percent of White adolescents ages 16 to 24 were high school dropouts, compared with 12 percent of African American adolescents and 24 percent of Hispanic adolescents.(24)
- Incarceration rates for African American male high school dropouts more than doubled between 1980 and 1999.(25)
- In 2005, 49 percent of Hispanic males, 47 percent of White males, and 30 percent of African American males in high school had at least one drink of alcohol within 30 days of being surveyed.(26)
[ Go to Contents ]
What Works for Boys?
Researchers have found that having supportive families, teachers, and peersmakes boys more likely to succeed. Theyve also found that facing certain challenges such as doing poorly in school or being exposed to violence in the family or community increases the likelihood that they will struggle. Of course, these strengths and challengesare not unique to boys. But researchers have found that boys and girls do have gender-specific social, emotional, and developmental needs and respond differently to the pressures of adolescence.
(A full list of the strengths and challenges that, according to research, can influence whether boys succeed or struggle is available on the Helping Americas Youth Web site: http://guide.helpingamericasyouth.gov/programtool-factors.cfm)
Based on their understanding of these strengths and challenges, researchers have studied various strategies for helpingyoung people become healthy, happy, productive adults. These studies often are not exclusive to boys; however, they provide some strategies that research suggests help to build boys strengths and lessen the obstacles they face.
The strategies for helping boys that are listed here have been evaluated in peer-reviewed scientific studies and have strong evidence to suggest that they work. Where appropriate, this brief provides information about whether the interventions included have focused on specific subgroups of boys.
Building Individual Strengths
Pair young people with caring adult mentors. Youth who perceive that they have support from adults in their lives develop personal qualities, such as life skills, problem-solving skills, and social skills, that allow them to thrive even in the most difficult life situations and the toughest environments.(27) Mentoring is one way to help young people know that adults care about them. Studies have found that youth with mentors often feel better about themselves and are less likely to use drugs.(28) Mentoring programs have been used effectively with various racial and ethnic groups, including White, African American, and Hispanic youth. Research suggests that mentoring programs that use the following practices are more likely to help young people:(29), (30), (31)
Providing intensive screening of potential mentors
- Training new mentors for a total of at least 6 hours and providing ongoing training and support
- Ensuring regular meetings between mentor and mentee that total 4 hours or more per month for at least a year
- Recruiting mentors who maintain a steady presence in their mentees lives by showing up for scheduled meetings, giving advanced notice when they need to cancel a meeting, and calling or e-mailing when they cant meet face-to-face
For boys in particular, features of effective mentoring programs include:
- Matching boys with male mentors who share the same culture, race, ethnicity, or interests
- Having mentors focus on teaching specific skills rather than simply trying to develop emotional connections
Community members can volunteer to be mentors. They should sign up for programs that include MENTORs elements of effective mentoring. People interested in mentoring can search for volunteer opportunities at http://www.mentoring.org/mentors/find_an_opportunity.
Local businesses, such as movie theaters, miniature golf courses, and bowling alleys can host mentor-mentee days. For more information about how to get involved, they can contact their State mentoring partnership. (For a list of State mentoring partnerships, see http://www.mentoring.org/find_resources/state_partnerships.)
Help youth understand the harmful effects of drinking, smoking, and using drugs.When adolescents think drugs such as marijuana and cocaine are bad for them and when they encounter social disapproval of drinking and using drugs, they may be less likely to use substances.(33), (34) By changing young peoples perceptions of smoking, drinking, and drug use, educators have been able to keep some adolescents from experimenting with drugs, alcohol, and tobacco.(35), (36), (37), (38), (39) Research is also beginning to show that smoking prevention programs in schools can work even better when paired with programs that teach parents and families how to prevent their children from smoking.(40) Overall, programs and interventions that prevent adolescent substance use tend to target general populations. However, these programs can be adapted to meet the needs for ethnic minority youth. Elements of effective programs include:
For teachers, in the classroom:(41), (42), (43), (44), (45)
- Conducting classroom discussions about the perceived acceptability of smoking, drinking, and doing drugs and developing lessons aimed at changing those perceptions
- Incorporating lessons about the physical and social harm that use or misuse of alcohol, drugs, and tobacco can have, both in the short and long term
- Initiating classroom conversations about the types of things that may cause youth to use substances, such as peer pressure, messages in the media, and personal pressures (wanting to fit in, feeling depressed)
- Teaching young people to communicate effectively, make good decisions, and reject peer pressure
For parents, at home:(46)
- Talking to children about drinking, smoking, and using drugs as well as about everyday problems and concerns
- Monitoring childrens behavior, their whereabouts, and their friends
- Applying consistent rules and fair discipline
Parents and concerned community groups can make sure school-based substance abuse prevention programs include the elements of effective interventions described above.
Schools can provide evidence-based prevention programs to their students and train teachers on how to appropriately broach classroom discussions with youth. School administrators can search for proven prevention programs on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrations
National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices, http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov. (See box on page 16 for more information about the registry.)
Building Strengths at Home
Strengthen family support through school-based programs or in-the-home therapy. Boys who have supportive, involved parents and families are less often bullied and victimized, get into less trouble with the law, and have fewer mental health problems.(47), (48), (49), (50), (51) They are more likely to do well in school and less likely to drop out.(52), (53) Bolstering family support by teaching parents and children to cope with stress and communicate well with one another can improve their behavior in school and help keep boys from committing crimes such as stealing and vandalizing.(54), (55), (56) Similar to the substance use prevention and intervention programs, family strengthening and support programs are developed for general populations but can be adapted to incorporate ethnic values, family values, and other cultural and contextual factors that meet the needs of minority families. Elements of these efforts include:(57), (58), (59)
- Teaching parents, through group or one-on-one sessions, to reward good behavior, communicate better with their children, put in place ways, such as weekly family meetings, for the whole family to communicate, set rules and expectations for their children, and discipline fairly and calmly
- Encouraging family bonding through shared activities and meals with other families
- Teaching young people, through group or one-on-one sessions, a range of skills including how to cope with stress, set goals, be aware of and control their feelings, solve problems, deal with peer pressure, and communicate better
- Providing families with access to appropriate mental health screenings, and with the skills, tools, and supports needed to address their childs mental health needs
- Fostering parent-child bonding through therapy sessions, including play therapy in which parents and children do activities together in the presence of a trained therapist
Give parents the skills they need to raise their children with fair discipline and adequate supervision.Young people who are disciplined harshly and whose parents do not supervise them are more likely than their peers to get into trouble with the law. They are also more likely to become aggressive or violent.(60) Programs that teach basic parenting skills, such as how to provide consistent rules and fair discipline and how to model good behavior, can, at least in the short term, help parents lessen their childrens aggressive behavior.(61) Such programs may be combined with school-based efforts to improve the ways teachers manage their classrooms, interact with students, and teach social skills and self-control.(62) Elements of effective parenting programs include:(63), (64), (65)
- Teaching effective family communication skills
- Emphasizing the importance of being involved in childrens education and proactively identifying effective resources to help struggling students
- Providing opportunities to discuss childrens problems and concerns
- Providing a range of approaches to family management and emphasizing the importance of monitoring childrens activities, friends, and hang outs
- Specifying strategies for fair and appropriate discipline with firm and consistent rule enforcement
- Developing components designed to improve parents wellbeing and reduce stress and anger
Schools can set up programs to help strengthen families by partnering with local mental health facilities and other community organizations that support families. School-based family support programs should include the elements described above.
Community organizations can make it easier for families to access services by offering free parenting classes at convenient hours and locations, providing family therapy programs and parenting resources in multiple languages, and offering onsite childcare.(66)
Developing Strengths Among Peers
Give young people ways to support each other. Most parents would say they want their children to hang out with the good kids. In fact, boys whose friends and schoolmates are supportive, rather than mean and bullying, are less likely to get in trouble with the law,to suffer from mental health problems,or to smoke, drink, or use drugs.(67), (68), (69) And boys who have friends who act out in class may be more likely to drop out of school.(70) School-based peer support groups and peer tutoring programs can help young people build better relationships with fellow students. They can also keep young people from drinking, change their minds about dropping out of school, and improve their grades, standardized test scores, and school attendance. Peer tutoring has been shown to have positive academic outcomes for African American and other minority students, as well as for White students.(71), (72), (73)
Elements of effective peer support programs include:(74), (75), (76)
- Organizing support groups on bullying, resiliency skills, staying sober, dealing with divorce or remarriage, coping with depression, or sharing feelings. Peer support groups may also provide academic help.
- Providing adult facilitators, both from the school and the community
- Including peer facilitators who have a semesters worth of training in listening and communication skills
- Ensuring that meetings occur weekly for regular periods of time (about an hour)
- Using a social skills curriculum that teaches good social behaviors, such as communicating clearly, listening, resolving conflicts, sharing, and helping others
- Providing young people with opportunities to practice acquired skills
- Having conversations with young people about how they define positive support from their peers
Elements of effective peer tutoring programs include:(77)
- Training tutors
- Training teachers to handle issues students face during the tutoring program
- Ensuring that tutoring lasts about 12 weeks
- Pairing tutors with tutees of the same sex, when possible
Young people can communicate with teachers and administrators about the kinds of support groups that would interest and help them. They can also ask about whether their schools offer peer tutoring programs and sign up to be a tutor or to be tutored.
Community centers can sponsor peer support groups that incorporate the elements of successful school-based programs.(79), (80)
Parents can encourage their children to attend support groups or peer tutoring sessions by researching options and showing an interest in the sessions content.
Building Strengths at School
Improve boys academic achievement and classroom behavior through comprehensive programs that focus on social skills as well as academics. Boys who disrupt class or are low achievers may be more likely to drop out of school.(81) And dropping out of school can put boys at risk for a host of other problems, such as poverty, unemployment, and criminal activity.(82) Programs that are successful at helping boys do better in their studies and get into less trouble at school tend to combine a number of different approaches, including:(83), (84)
- Intervening immediately when students begin to miss school
- Focusing on truancy and school attendance in the early years even elementary school and kindergarten
- Involving parents in school activities and providing them with communication and parenting skills
- Enhancing competency in reading and math
- Training teachers on how to better manage their classrooms and teach in interactive and cooperative ways
- Making summer sessions, mentoring, and extra tutoring available for high school students preparing for college
For boys, in particular:
- Focusing on boys education before problems arise, as early as preschool
- Teaching boys ways to relate positively with peers and adults
Community members can volunteer to tutor students preparing for college.
Parents can monitor how their children are doing in school from an early age and, if necessary, seek help immediately from enrichment programs.
Empower boys in the classroom. Boys who feel connected to their schools and supported by teachers do better in their studies and are less likely to misbehave in class.(85),(86) When schools and teachers empower students by involving them in day-to-day decisions about classroom rules and procedures, boys are sent to the principals office less often, have better attendance, and generally do better in school. Such efforts can also increase teacher attendance. Because teachers spend less time disciplining students, class time becomes more efficient and enjoyable for both teachers and students.(87),(88) Elements of these efforts include:(89)
- Empowering teachers and students to create a climate of mutual respect and caring in and out of the classroom
- Training teachers to involve students in classroom management strategies
- Establishing expectations for behavior and learning at the beginning of the school year
- Creating partnerships between teachers and students in which they share responsibility for planning classroom activities
- Encouraging teachers to show students they care by eating lunch with them or arranging one-on-one time if a student needs extra help with an assignment
- Assigning students roles as helpers and managers in the classroom through a fair application process
- Involving parents and other adults as classroom speakers and role models
Schools can invite parents to talk to students about how school rules about good behavior relate to real life and work settings.(91)
Fostering Strengths in Communities
Give youth a sense of connectedness through community partnerships. Young people who grow up feeling connected to their communities have better health, greater social competence, and more self-confidence.(92) Young people who grow up in distressed and disconnected communities those characterized by crime, gang activity, and deteriorated housing are more likely to act violently.(93) One way to help young people feel connected to their community is through community partnerships that create opportunities for youth and demonstrate to young people that the community cares for them. Studies have shown that partnerships in diverse communities can successfully support youth.(94),(95),(96) Elements of effective community partnerships include:
- Identifying potential partners at the outset, including community leaders, residents, youth, schools, faith-based institutions, and businesses
- Encouraging participation from all members and inviting youth to be active partners
- Establishing a motivating mission, as well as specific and realistic goals for what the partnership wants to accomplish
- Encouraging the formation of relationships both within the group and with the larger community
- Respecting the communitys values and cultural beliefs
- Developing consistent messages and actions around the importance of creating more positive environments for youth
Local businesses can donate space for community partnerships to meet. They can also host a community forum to discuss community challenges and opportunities.
Community-based organizations can collect local data and produce a community report that tells the community how it measures up on youth issues. Community organizations can also encourage and reward adults who provide positive opportunities for youth.
Police can find ways to develop relationships with young people in high-crime neighborhoods, for instance by visiting schools and drop-in centers. Police officers and community members can also discuss common concerns and ways to work together.
Create community-wide efforts to prevent substance use and abuse among adolescents. When young people can easily get their hands on drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol in their neighborhoods, they are more likely to use drugs, smoke, or drink early on and, as a result, more likely to abuse substances or become dependent on them.(97) When communities band together, pooling the energies of parents, schools, policymakers, and businesses into comprehensive prevention efforts, they can reduce underage smoking, drinking, drunk driving, and sales of tobacco products and alcohol to minors.(98), (99), (100), (101) Elements of these efforts include:
- Involving local media outlets in spreading messages that condemn underage drinking, drunk driving, smoking, and illegal drug use
- Improving the enforcement of laws that prohibit selling alcohol to minors and establishing laws that create drug-free zones around schools and parks
- Holding awareness days around drunk and drugged driving
- Initiating telephone hotlines for reporting drunk and drugged driving
- Restricting young peoples access to tobacco products by educating merchants about why they shouldnt sell tobacco to minors and strengthening and strictly enforcing laws around those sales
- Informing retailers about how and why they should prevent underage youth from buying alcohol
- Training bar staff on how to responsibly serve alcoholic beverages
- Increasing enforcement of drunk-driving laws
- Implementing effective school-based curricula to prevent smoking, drinking, and drug use
- Educating parents and creating avenues for them to get involved in keeping their children from using smoking, drinking, or using drugs
Local community organizations and businesses should support no-drinking and no-smoking messages aimed at youth.
Community resources such as local newspapers and civic organizations should recognize those businesses that adhere to regulations and condemn those that do not.
Parents who smoke or have a drinking problem should get help to quit.
[ Go to Contents ]
What Works for Boys
Boys problems are not intractable and their strengths are many. Research has shown that, sometimes, simple steps can go a long way toward helping support boys as they confront challenges: Showing them that adults care about them.(102),(103) Talking to them candidly about drugs, tobacco, and alcohol.(104),(105),(106) Encouraging them to help, rather than bully, each other.(107) Providing them with positive, supervised ways to spend their time when they are not in school.(108)
Caring adults in families, schools, and communities can also come together to build comprehensive solutions to boys challenges solutions that focus not just on individuals, but on the social networks that surround them.
Researchers dont yet have all the answers. In particular, more research is needed into ways to help boys navigate through poverty, unsafe neighborhoods, and violent crime. Solutions must also be studied that address the challenges specific subpopulations of boys face.
There is no one right answer. Some boys may respond well to simple interventions, while others require years of additional support. What we do know is that, despite challenges, there is great opportunity to prepare all boys in America to develop their capabilities, reach the potential, and transition successfully to adulthood.
Where To Learn More About Strategies That Work
- The What Works Clearinghouse U.S. Department of Educationhttp://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc Information about interventions that improve educational outcomes for children and youth. The site lists various strategies that can help students succeed.
- Model Programs Guide U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preventionhttp://www.dsgonline.com/mpg2.5/mpg_index.htm Searchable database of scientifically proven programs that target a range of problems adolescents may have. Programs are rated as promising, effective, or exemplary, depending on the strength of the research that supports the programs use.
- National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices, or NREPP U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrationhttp://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov Searchable online directory of mental health and substance abuse interventions for people of all ages. Each intervention is reviewed and rated by independent experts according to two sets of criteria: quality of research and readiness for dissemination. Users can search for interventions specifically tailored to adolescents and young adults.
- Helping Americas Youth Program Tool The White House, in partnership with 10 Federal agencieshttp://guide.helpingamericasyouth.gov/programtool.cfm Searchable database of programs that help put young people on the right track. All programs in the database have been shown in studies to be effective. Programs are rated as levels 1, 2, or 3 depending on the strength of the research supporting their use.
- Promising and Effective Practices Network, or PEPNet, Index to Quality Practices U.S. Department of Labor and National Youth Employment Coalitionhttp://www.nyec.org/page.cfm?pageID=110 Searchable database of more than 1,000 things that effective youth employment programs do to prepare young people for the world of work.
[ Go to Contents ]
To download an electronic copy of this document visit:http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/boys/Findings1/brief.shtml
For more information and resources on boys, including promising interventions and federal approaches to help boys, visit:
[ Go to Contents ]
(1) Puzzanchera, C., & Kang, W. (2007). Juvenile court statistics databook. Retrieved December 31, 2007, from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/jcsdb
(2) Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 19752006. Volume I: Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 07-6205). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/vol1_2006.pdf
(3) Child Trends. (n.d.). High school dropout rates. In Child Trends Data Bank. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/1HighSchoolDropout.cfm
(4) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). Retrieved November 28, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars
(5) Fox, M. A., Connolly, B. A., & Snyder, T. D. (2005).Youth Indicators 2005: Trends in the well-being of American youth (NCES 2005050). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
(6) Child Trends. (n.d.). Volunteering. In Child Trends Data Bank. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/20Volunteering.cfm
(7) Stahl, A. L., Puzzanchera, C., Livsey, S., Sladky, A., Finnegan, T. A., Tierney, N., et al. (2007). Juvenile court statistics 20032004. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
(8) Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
(9) Child Trends. (n.d.). Juvenile detention: Adolescents in residential placement. In Child Trends Data Bank. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/88JuvenileDetention.cfm
(10) Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007).
(11) Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007).
(12) Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007).
(13) Pruitt, I. T. P. (2007). Family treatment approaches for depression in adolescent males. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 6981.
(14) National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007). Dropout rates in the United States: 2005. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/dropout05/tables/table_01.asp
(15) Bloom, B., & Cohen, R. A. (2007). Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2006.Vital Health Stat 10, 234, 179. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/adhd.htm
(16) Porterfield, S. L., & Winkler, A. E. (2007). Teen time use and parental education: Evidence from the CPS, MTF, and ATUS. Monthly Labor Review, 130, 3756.
(17) Porterfield, S. L., & Winkler, A. E. (2007).
(18) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS).
(19) Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2007). Americas children: Key national indicators of well being, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
(20) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS).
(21) Child Trends. (n.d.). Teen homicide, suicide, and firearm death. In Child Trends Data Bank. Retrieved November 14, 2007, from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/70ViolentDeath.cfm
(22) Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006).
(23) Bloom B., & Cohen R. A. (2007).
(24) Child Trends. (n.d.). High school dropout rates.
(25) Child Trends. (n.d.). High school dropout rates.
(26) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Youth risk behavior surveillance United States 2005. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 55, 1108.
(27) Brown, J. H., DEmidio-Caston, M., & Benard, B. (2001). Resilience education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
(28) Jekielek, S. M., Moore, K. A., Hair, E. C., & Scarupa, H. J. (2002). Mentoring: A promising strategy for youth development. Retrieved December 27, 2007, from http://www.childtrends.org/files/MentoringBrief2002.pdf
(29) MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2005). How to build a successful mentoring program using the Elements of Effective Practice. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.mentoring.org/downloads/mentoring_413.pdf
(30) Darling, N., Bogat, G. A., Cavell, T. A., Murphy, S. E., & Sánchez, B. (2006). Gender, ethnicity, development, and risk: Mentoring and the consideration of individual differences. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 765780.
(31) Jekielek, S. M., Moore, K. A., Hair, E. C., & Scarupa, H. J. (2002).
(32) MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2005).
(33) Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., OMalley, P. M., & Humphrey, R. H. (1988). Explaining the recent decline in marijuana use: Differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 29, 92112.
(34) Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & OMalley, P. M. (1990). Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among young adults: Further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 173184.
(35) Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a White middle-class population. JAMA, 273, 11061112.
(36) Williams, C. L., & Perry, C. L. (1998). Lessons from Project Northland: Preventing alcohol problems during adolescence. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22, 107116.
(37) Eckhardt, L., Woodruff, S. I., & Elder, J. P. (1997). Relative effectiveness of continued, lapsed, and delayed smoking prevention intervention in senior high school students. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 418421.
(38) Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D. & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the Child Development Project on students drug use and other problem behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 7599.
(39) Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226234.
(40) Flay, B. R. (2007). The long-term promise of effective school-based smoking prevention programs. In R. J. Bonnie, K. Stratton, & R. B. Wallace (Eds.), Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation. (pp. 449 477). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
(41) Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995).
(42) Williams, C. L., & Perry, C. L. (1998).
(43) Eckhardt, L., Woodruff, S. I. & Elder, J. P. (1997).
(44) Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000).
(45) Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999).
(46) Robertson, E. B., David, S. L., & Rao, S. A. (2003). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders, 2nd Edition. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
(47) Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Protective factors as moderators of risk factors in adolescence bullying. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 263284.
(48) Prevatt, F. F. (2003). The contribution of parenting practices in a risk and resiliency model of childrens adjustment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 469480.
(49) Wiesner, M., & Windle, M. (2004). Assessing covariates of adolescent delinquency trajectories: A latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 431442.
(50) Meadows, S. O. (2007). Evidence of parallel pathways: Gender similarity in the impact of social support on adolescent depression and delinquency. Social Forces, 85, 11431167.
(51) Meadows, S. O. (2007).
(52) Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237269.
(53) Vitaro, F., LaRocque, D., Janosz, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Negative social experiences and dropping out of school. Educational Psychology, 21, 401415.
(54) Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). The Coping Power Program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: Outcome effects at the 1-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 571578.
(55) Helping Americas Youth. (n.d.). Multisystemic therapy. In Community Guide to Helping Americas Youth. Retrieved December 13, 2007, from http://guide.helpingamericasyouth.gov/programdetail.cfm?id=363
(56) Terrion, J. L. (2006). Building social capital in vulnerable families: Success markers of a school-based intervention program. Youth & Society, 38, 155176.
(57) Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004).
(58) Helping Americas Youth. (n.d.).
(59) Terrion, J. L. (2006).
(60) Kellermann, A. L., Fuqua-Whitley, D. S., Rivara, F. P., & Mercy, J. (1998). Preventing youth violence: What works? Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 271292.
(61) Kellermann, A. L., Fuqua-Whitley, D. S., Rivara, F. P., & Mercy, J. (1998).
(62) Kellermann, A. L., Fuqua-Whitley, D. S., Rivara, F. P., & Mercy, J. (1998).
(63) Kumpfer, K. L., & Adler, S. (2003). Dissemination of research-based family interventions for the prevention of substance abuse. In Z. Sloboda & W. B. Bukoski, (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention: Theory, science and practice (pp. 75100). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
(64) Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, S. G. (1996). Preventive parenting with love, encouragement and limits. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 241243.
(65) Lundahl, B. W., Nimer, J., & Parsons, B. (2006). Preventing child abuse: A meta-analysis of parent training programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 251262.
(66) Family Strengthening Policy Center. (2007). The parenting imperative: Investing in parents so children and youth succeed. Washington, D.C.: National Human Services Assembly.
(67) Meadows, S. O. (2007).
(68) Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children, 9, 3044.
(69) Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64105.
(70) Vitaro, F., LaRocque, D., Janosz, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001).
(71) Wassef, A., Mason, G., Collins, M. L., OBoyle, M., & Ingham, D. (1996). In search of effective programs to address students emotional distress and behavioral problems Part III: Student assessment of school-based support groups. Adolescence, 31, 116.
(72) Corn, K. L., & Moore, D. D. (1992). Reach for the S.T.A.R.S. Students Teaching and Reaching Students: A two-faceted peer facilitating program at Greenfield-Central High School. School Counselor, 40, 6872.
(73) Robinson, D. R., Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 327362.
(74) Wassef, A., Mason, G., Collins, M. L., OBoyle, M., & Ingham, D. (1996).
(75) Corn, K. L. & Moore, D. D. (1992).
(76) Skinner, C. H., Neddenriep, C. E., Robinson, S. L., Ervin, R., & Jones, K. (2002). Altering educational environments through positive peer reporting: Prevention and remediation of social problems associated with behavior disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 191202.
(77) Skinner, C. H., Neddenriep, C. E., Robinson, S. L., Ervin, R., & Jones, K. (2002).
(78) Skinner, C. H., Neddenriep, C. E., Robinson, S. L., Ervin, R., & Jones, K. (2002).
(79) Wassef, A., Mason, G., Collins, M. L., OBoyle, M., & Ingham, D. (1996).
(80) Corn, K. L. & Moore, D. D. (1992).
(81) Vitaro, F., LaRocque, D., Janosz, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001).
(82) Child Trends. (n.d.) High school dropout rates.
(83) Project GRAD USA. (n.d.) Our model: Five core programs. Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://www.projectgrad.org
(84) Hammond, C., Linton, D., Smink, J., & Drew, S. (2007). Dropout risk factors and exemplary programs: A technical report. Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://www.dropoutprevention.org/resource/major_reports/communities_in_schools.htm
(85) Downey, D. B., & Vogt Yuan, A. S. (2005). Sex differences in school performance during high school: Puzzling patterns and possible explanations. Sociological Quarterly, 46, 299321.
(86) Theodore, L. A., Bray, M. A. & Kehle, T. J. (2004). A comparative study of group contingencies and randomized reinforcers to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 253271.
(87) Freiberg, H. J., Connell, M. L., & Lorentz, J. (2001). Effects of Consistency Management on student mathematics achievement in seven chapter I elementary schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 6, 249270.
(88) American Federation of Teachers. (2000). Building on the best, learning from what works: Five promising discipline and violence prevention programs. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/downloads/teachers/wwdiscipline.pdf
(89) Freiberg, H. J., Connell, M. L., & Lorentz, J. (2001).
(90) Freiberg, H. J., Connell, M. L., & Lorentz, J. (2001).
(91) Freiberg, H. J., Connell, M. L., & Lorentz, J. (2001).
(92) Ealey, S., Wituk, S., Schultz, J., Usher, J., Meissen, G., & Pearson, R. (2006). The Community Development for Healthy Children initiative. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 129138.
(93) Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 112.
(94) Meyer, A. L., Cohen, R., Edmonds, T., & Masho, S. (2008). Developing a comprehensive approach to youth violence prevention in a small city. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (Suppl 3), S13S20.
(95) Mirabal, B., López-Sánchez, G., Franco-Ortiz, M., & Méndez, M. (2008). Developing partnerships to advance youth violence prevention in Puerto Rico: The role of an academic center of excellence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (Suppl 3), S56S61.
(96) Griffith, D. M., Allen, J. O., Zimmerman, M. A., Morrel-Samuels, S., Reischl, T. M., Cohen, S. E., et al. (2008). Organizational empowerment in community mobilization to address youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (Suppl 3), S89S99.
(97) Van Etten, M. L., & Anthony, J. C. (1999). Comparative epidemiology of initial drug opportunities and transitions to first use: Marijuana, cocaine, hallucinogens and heroin. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 54, 117125.
(98) Holder, H. D. (2004). Community prevention of young adult drinking and associated problems. Alcohol Research & Health, 28, 245249.
(99) Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441448.
(100) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Tobacco. In The community guide to preventive services. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/tobacco/default.htm
(101) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Alcohol. In The community guide to preventive services. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/alcohol
(102) Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2005).
(103) Ryan, L. G., Miller-Loessi, L., & Nieri, T. (2007). Relationships with adults as predictors of substance use, gang involvement, and threats to safety among disadvantaged urban high-school adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 10531071.
(104) Mandara, J., Murray, C. B., & Bangi, A. K. (2003). Predictors of African American adolescent sexual activity: An ecological framework. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 337356.
(105) Robertson, E. B., David, S. L., & Rao, S. A. (2003).
(106) Ryan, L. G., Miller-Loessi, L., & Nieri, T. (2007).
(107) Kellermann, A. L., Fuqua-Whitley, D. S., Rivara, F. P., & Mercy, J. (1998).
(108) Richards, M. H., Larson, R., Miller, B. V., Luo, Z., Sims, B., Parrella, D. P., et al. (2004). Risky and protective contexts and exposure to violence in urban African American young adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 138148.