STATUS: Completed Project
It is challenging to define and collect patient data (e.g., lab test results, marital status, and patient-reported depression) in a standardized way in different comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies. This makes it difficult to enable the comparison of results and facilitate the use of electronic health record (EHR) systems as a source of valid CER data.
PROJECT PURPOSE & GOALS
At the onset of this project, various clinical and health service research groups were already engaged in independent initiatives to standardize electronic data collection. Work was needed to build on these individual efforts to make it easier to conduct CER in diverse community health care settings, reduce data collection burden on health care providers and patients, and make site-specific modifications to EHR system capabilities in order to enable community participation. The infrastructure that would accommodate this goal consists of two components: 1) an authoritative repository to maintain and distribute up-to-date common data elements (CDEs) and patient assessment specifications with underlying terminology values sets for researchers and EHR developers: and 2) a standardized mechanism that would enable an EHR to capture structured data for a specified use case. With this infrastructure in place, researchers would readily have access to standardized electronic versions of data collection instruments relevant to CER.
Objectives: The four goals of the work to be accomplished during the five years were to:
Select and require the use of health information technology (IT) standards-based CDEs and patient assessment instruments in CER and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR).
Develop and validate a health IT standards-based extensible electronic case report form (eCRF) to be used within EHRs to enable efficient capture of data on individual patients for specified use cases. This data will be merged with comparable data for other relevant patients and used in CER.
Enhance health IT standards infrastructure to support effective maintenance, distribution, and use of the definitions of CDEs and patient assessment instruments, with particular emphasis on the standard terminology value sets required to define them.
Establish the standards, services, and policies that integrate PCOR activities into the clinical health IT.
PROJECT ACHIEVEMENTS & HIGHLIGHTS
ONC’s role in this project was to identify a community of public and private stakeholder groups and facilitate their active participation and contribution to the identification and development of standards through a public and virtual platform called the Standards & Interoperability Framework (S&I). Through this initiative, ONC developed CDEs and the standards for eCRF structures/templates in a human-readable and machine-readable format. During the project’s timeframe, lack of consensus among the project’s national stakeholders precluded the identification of the particular CDEs that could population any eCRF. Stakeholder consensus was crucial, and it was later accomplished. The results of this endeavor were the initial entries into the NIH/NLM’s CDE Repository.
The NLM created and populated the NIH CDE Repository. The NIH CDE Repository has been designed to provide access to structured human and machine-readable definitions of data elements that have been recommended or required by NIH Institutes and Centers and other organizations for use in research and for other purposes.
The CDE Repository currently contains 12 classifications of CDEs totaling 1,131,344 elements across the classifications.
PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, AND OTHER PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE RESOURCES
Sheehan, J., Hirschfeld, S., Foster, E., Ghitza, U., Goetz, K., Karpinski, J., Lang, L., Moser, R.P., Odenkirchen, J., Reeves, D., Rubinstein, Y., Werner, E., and Huerta, M. (2016, December). Improving the value of clinical research through the use of Common Data Elements. Clinical Trials, 13 (6), 671-676.
CDE Repository Website: https://cde.nlm.nih.gov/home. This website was initially developed as part of the 2012 award from OS PCORTF. There have been continuing entries through to the present since that time, as previously noted.
Learn about basic CDE terms here.
Below is a list of ASPE-funded PCORTF projects that are related to this project
Expanding Data Collection for the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) - This project also focused on standardizing the collection of standardized clinical data and created tools that facilitate EHR reporting for CER. Enhanced data collection and data linkages between central cancer registries and other health related datasets can provide researchers with essential real-world and population-based data for CER. This project built upon previous funding provided to central cancer registries operated by 10 states—part of the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR)—to collect detailed treatment and outcomes data from electronic data sources.
Strengthening and Expanding the Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) Registry to Conduct Patient-Centered Outcomes Research - This project focused on standardizing the collection of standardized clinical data by building a research resource. This project supported the maintenance of the current Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) infrastructure and expansion of the CHARN database to include data for calendar years 2006, 2007, and 2011-2013, which completed the CHARN database from 2006 through 2013. The project also successfully supported efforts to make CHARN data available to more PCOR investigators outside of the CHARN network, by developing a public use analytic database file and associated data codebook.