Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Long-Term Services & Supports (LTSS)

Reports

Displaying 261 - 270 of 283. 10 per page. Page 27.

Advanced Search
Report to Congress

Report to Congress on Identifying Individuals at Risk of Institutionalization

This report to Congress responds to a mandate of the Orphan Drug Act (P.L.97-414, January 4, 1983), which called for the Secretary of HHS to conduct demonstration projects to test methods for identifying individuals at risk of institutional placement who could be treated more cost-effectively with home health and other non-institutional services.
Report to the Secretary

Report to the Secretary on Private Financing of Long-Term Care for the Elderly

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The Planning and Operational Experience of the Channeling Projects

George Carcagno, Robert Applebaum, Jon Christianson, Barbara Phillips, Craig Thornton and Joanna Will Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. July 18, 1986 This report was prepared under contract #HHS-100-80-0157 between the U.S.

Analysis of Channeling Project Costs

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The Evaluation of the National Long Term Care Demonstration: Final Report

  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Channeling Effects on Hospital, Nursnig Home and Other Medical Services

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Analysis of the Benefits and Costs of Channeling

  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

An Analysis of Site-Specific Results

  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Final Report on the Effects of Sample Attrition on Estimates of Channeling's Impacts

This report results from an investigation of the extent to which differential attrition from the research sample in the Channeling Demonstration might have led to biased estimates of program impact. Two analytical approaches were adopted--a heuristic approach and a statistical modeling approach.