Logo of Dept. of Health and Human Services.

Early Implementation
of the
Welfare-to-Work Grants Program

Report to Congress
March 1999


Authors:
Irma Perez-Johnson and Alan M. Hershey

Prepared under Contract 100-98-009 with the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
by
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
P.O. Box 2393
Princeton, NJ 08543-2393
(609) 799-3535
www.mathematica-mpr.com

Project Officer:  Alana Landey Project Director:  Alan M. Hershey

Acknowledgements | Table of Contents | List of Tables | List of Figures ]


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report responds to a congressional mandate for rapid findings on early WtW program implementation from the National Evaluation of the Welfare-to-Work Grants Program.  Meeting this mandate would not have been possible without the diligent work of a large cast of individuals at Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (MPR) and its partner organizations.  The authors wish to acknowledge their invaluable contributions.

At MPR, we are thankful to Todd Ensor for his key role in designing and pretesting the WtW grantee survey instrument.  Sedhou Ranganathan assembled the respondent sample and tracking database.  Shawn Marsh and Todd Ensor conducted the survey, with oversight from Rita Stapulonis, the survey director for the overall evaluation.  Their challenging assignment entailed coordinating the printing and mailing of survey instruments, tracking the sample (especially nonrespondents) to achieve the desired response rate, answering respondent questions, overseeing quality assurance procedures, and creating a research data set — all over a period of about three months.  A team of dedicated quality control staff reviewed responses and diligently contacted grantees when necessary to clarify ambiguities or contradictions.  Dina Kirschenbaum carefully and efficiently completed the programming that supported the analysis, and Alison Stieglitz prepared many of the tables.  Patricia Ciaccio provided creative but careful editing.  Jennifer Baskwell and others among MPR's secretarial staff did a superb word processing and production job, as usual.

We are also grateful to Walter Corson and Tom Fraker at MPR; Demetra Nightingale, Nancy Pindus, and Terri Thompson at the Urban Institute, and Walter Hillabrant at Support Services International, Inc., for their insightful comments as reviewers of the draft document.

We received valuable support from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Labor.  Alana Landey, the project officer in the USDHHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, has given consistently useful advice and guidance.  Staff from the USDOL Welfare-to-Work Office in the Employment and Training Administration, in particular Cheryl Turner, have provided important information about the policy framework in which the welfare-to-work programs operate.

We are also indebted to the hundreds of busy managers and administrators who gave generously of their time and provided information on their WtW programs.  We appreciate their contributions, as well as those of others we may have omitted unintentionally.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

A.   BACKGROUND AND DESIGN OF THE EVALUATION

  1. Policy and Economic Context for the WtW Evaluation
  2. Objectives and Design of the Evaluation

B.   ORGANIZATIONS AND RESOURCES SUPPORTING WtW GRANTS PROGRAM

  1. Private Industry Councils Are, as Planned, the Primary Vehicle for WtW Services
  2. Given the Gradual Funding Rollout, Survey Results Provide a Very Early Snapshot
  3. Diverse Sources of Other Funds Are Being Tapped to Complement WtW Grants

C.   THE POPULATION TO BE SERVED AND HOW THEY WILL BE RECRUITED

  1. Most Grantees Will Serve the Overall WtW Population Rather than Targeted Subgroups
  2. Recruitment Will Rely Most Heavily on Referral from TANF Agencies
  3. Expected Characteristics of WtW Participants

D.   THE SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES GRANTEES PROVIDE

  1. Services and Resource Allocation Emphasize Employment
  2. Grantee Plans Recognize the Need to Support Participants in Their Employment Efforts

E.   STARTUP AND EARLY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

  1. Program Startup Is Occurring Mostly in Late 1998 and Early 1999
  2. Early Enrollments Are Proceeding at a Modest Pace

F.   EMERGING ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION

  1. Grantee Views on Early Implementation
  2. Future Issues for the Evaluation

APPENDIX   FIRST WELFARE-TO-WORK GRANTEE SURVEY:  RESPONSE RATES BY STATE AND TYPES OF GRANT RECEIVED


TABLES

A-1.  GRANTEE CHARACTERISTICS:  OVERALL SURVEY SAMPLE AND SURVEY RESPONDENTS

A-2.  DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS AND NON­RESPONDENTS BY FUNDING AMOUNT AND TYPE

B-1.  CHARACTERISTICS OF GRANTEE SURVEY RESPONDENTS:  TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS AND GRANTS RECEIVED

B-2.  TIMING OF WtW GRANTS AWARDED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

B-3.  TIMING OF LOCAL WtW GRANTS REPORTED BY SURVEY RESPONDENTS

B-4.  SCALE OF WtW PROGRAMS:  GRANT SIZE AND PROJECTED PARTICIPATION

C-1.  EXTENT OF TARGETING BY WtW GRANTEES

C-2.  PARTICIPANTS TARGETED BY WtW GRANTEES

C-3.  SOURCES OF WtW REFERRAL AND RECRUITMENT

C-4.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECTED PARTICIPANTS ACROSS ALL RESPONDING GRANTEES

D-1.  PROJECTED USES OF FEDERAL WtW GRANT FUNDS

E-1.  PROGRAM STARTUP AND ENROLLMENT

F-1.  GRANTEE VIEWS ON WtW IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES


FIGURES

B. 1  GRANTEES' PLANS FOR USING OTHER SOURCES TO COMPLEMENT WtW FUNDS: FIRST GRANT YEAR