Table 7.3 Program Impacts on Employment Status of Respondent and Other Household Members in the Last Month of Follow-Up Sample Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Only respondent employed (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 31.8 27.8 4.1 ** 14.7 EORYOHHN Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 28.2 27.8 0.4 1.5 EORYOHHN Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 37.7 32.8 4.9 * 15.0 EORYOHHN Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 33.9 32.8 1.1 3.2 EORYOHHN Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 28.4 22.4 5.9 *** 26.5 EORYOHHN Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 25.7 18.4 7.4 *** 40.2 EORYOHHN Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 25.7 18.4 7.4 *** 40.1 EORYOHHN Columbus Integrated 728 37.6 27.4 10.2 *** 37.1 EORYOHHN Columbus Traditional 723 31.5 27.4 4.1 14.9 EORYOHHN Detroit 426 33.8 28.3 5.5 19.4 EORYOHHN Oklahoma City 511 30.2 28.9 1.3 4.5 EORYOHHN Portland 610 32.5 21.6 10.9 *** 50.5 EORYOHHN Only other household members employed (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 8.5 11.7 -3.2 ** -27.2 EORNOHHY Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 9.6 11.7 -2.1 -17.6 EORNOHHY Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 13.7 12.6 1.1 8.8 EORNOHHY Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 11.8 12.6 -0.8 -6.2 EORNOHHY Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 17.6 18.6 -1.1 -5.7 EORNOHHY Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 19.6 19.8 -0.2 -1.1 EORNOHHY Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 19.6 19.8 -0.2 -1.0 EORNOHHY Columbus Integrated 728 10.8 14.4 -3.6 -25.0 EORNOHHY Columbus Traditional 723 12.2 14.4 -2.2 -15.0 EORNOHHY Detroit 426 4.5 8.6 -4.0 -47.1 EORNOHHY Oklahoma City 511 15.2 21.2 -6.0 * -28.3 EORNOHHY Portland 610 19.3 23.6 -4.4 -18.5 EORNOHHY (continued) Table 7.3 (continued) Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Respondent and other household members employed (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 7.6 8.6 -0.9 -11.0 EORYOHHY Atlanta Human Capital Development 8.9 8.6 0.4 4.3 EORYOHHY Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 18.8 18.6 0.2 1.1 EORYOHHY Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 19.2 18.6 0.6 3.5 EORYOHHY Riverside Labor Force Attachment 14.2 13.0 1.2 9.2 EORYOHHY Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 11.8 10.1 1.7 16.7 EORYOHHY Riverside Human Capital Development 11.2 10.1 1.1 10.6 EORYOHHY Columbus Integrated 14.3 13.2 1.1 8.5 EORYOHHY Columbus Traditional 14.5 13.2 1.3 10.2 EORYOHHY Detroit 9.7 5.8 3.9 67.8 EORYOHHY Oklahoma City 18.6 19.4 -0.9 -4.4 EORYOHHY Portland 17.6 13.1 4.5 33.9 EORYOHHY Respondent and other household members not employed (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 52.0 52.0 0.0 0.1 eornohhn Atlanta Human Capital Development 53.2 52.0 1.3 2.4 eornohhn Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 29.8 36.0 -6.2 ** -17.3 eornohhn Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 35.1 36.0 -0.9 -2.6 eornohhn Riverside Labor Force Attachment 39.9 46.0 -6.1 *** -13.2 eornohhn Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 42.9 51.7 -8.9 *** -17.1 eornohhn Riverside Human Capital Development 43.5 51.7 -8.2 *** -15.9 eornohhn Columbus Integrated 37.3 45.0 -7.7 ** -17.1 eornohhn Columbus Traditional 41.8 45.0 -3.3 -7.3 eornohhn Detroit 52.0 57.4 -5.4 -9.4 eornohhn Oklahoma City 36.0 30.5 5.6 18.3 eornohhn Portland 30.7 41.6 -11.0 *** -26.4 eornohhn
Table 7.2 Program Impacts on Total Respondent Income in the Last Month of Follow-Up Sample Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Total measured respondent income ($) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 691 669 22 3.3 INCTOT2 Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 699 669 30 * 4.4 INCTOT2 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 791 828 -37 -4.5 INCTOT2 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 793 828 -35 -4.2 INCTOT2 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 879 860 19 2.2 INCTOT2 Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 854 851 4 0.4 INCTOT2 Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 845 851 -5 -0.6 INCTOT2 Columbus Integrated 728 770 778 -7 -0.9 INCTOT2 Columbus Traditional 723 793 778 15 2.0 INCTOT2 Detroit 426 782 764 18 2.4 INCTOT2 Oklahoma City 511 671 706 -35 -5.0 INCTOT2 Portland 610 891 834 57 6.8 INCTOT2 Respondent earnings as a percentage of total measured income (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 29.8 26.5 3.3 * 12.4 SVERNP2 Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 27.9 26.5 1.4 5.3 SVERNP2 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 42.0 36.3 5.7 ** 15.7 SVERNP2 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 38.6 36.3 2.3 6.4 SVERNP2 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 29.9 23.5 6.4 *** 27.1 SVERNP2 Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 25.6 18.7 6.9 *** 37.1 SVERNP2 Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 23.9 18.7 5.3 ** 28.3 SVERNP2 Columbus Integrated 728 41.3 31.9 9.4 *** 29.4 SVERNP2 Columbus Traditional 723 34.6 31.9 2.7 8.4 SVERNP2 Detroit 426 31.0 21.4 9.5 *** 44.3 SVERNP2 Oklahoma City 511 37.6 38.1 -0.5 -1.3 SVERNP2 Portland 610 38.5 26.2 12.2 *** 46.6 SVERNP2 (continued) Table 7.2 (continued) Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Total measured respondent net income ($) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 723 699 24 3.4 INCTOT3 Atlanta Human Capital Development 725 699 26 3.7 INCTOT3 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 792 833 -42 -5.0 INCTOT3 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 805 833 -28 -3.4 INCTOT3 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 886 867 19 2.2 INCTOT3 Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 864 859 5 0.6 INCTOT3 Riverside Human Capital Development 849 859 -10 -1.2 INCTOT3 Columbus Integrated 797 806 -9 -1.1 INCTOT3 Columbus Traditional 823 806 17 2.1 INCTOT3 Detroit 776 766 10 1.3 INCTOT3 Oklahoma City 697 737 -40 -5.4 INCTOT3 Portland 902 843 59 7.0 INCTOT3 Total measured respondent net income at or above the poverty level (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 21.1 19.9 1.2 6.0 SI3100M Atlanta Human Capital Development 20.5 19.9 0.6 3.1 SI3100M Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 31.7 31.4 0.4 1.2 SI3100M Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 31.3 31.4 -0.1 -0.2 SI3100M Riverside Labor Force Attachment 33.6 27.4 6.3 *** 22.8 SI3100M Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 30.6 23.2 7.4 *** 31.8 SI3100M Riverside Human Capital Development 26.7 23.2 3.5 14.9 SI3100M Columbus Integrated 27.2 23.9 3.3 13.8 SI3100M Columbus Traditional 28.4 23.9 4.5 18.9 SI3100M Detroit 24.7 20.9 3.7 17.8 SI3100M Oklahoma City 25.3 26.0 -0.6 -2.4 SI3100M Portland 35.6 29.2 6.4 21.7 SI3100M
Table 7.5 Program Impacts on Total Household Income in the Last Month of Follow-Up Sample Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Total measured household income ($) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 972 971 0.1 0.0 hinctot2 Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 992 971 21.0 2.2 hinctot2 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 1325 1356 -30.9 -2.3 hinctot2 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 1289 1356 -67.7 -5.0 hinctot2 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 1409 1431 -21.6 -1.5 hinctot2 Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 1381 1377 4.7 0.3 hinctot2 Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 1431 1377 53.7 3.9 hinctot2 Columbus Integrated 728 1153 1219 -66.0 -5.4 hinctot2 Columbus Traditional 723 1211 1219 -8.4 -0.7 hinctot2 Detroit 426 1166 1124 42.3 3.8 hinctot2 Oklahoma City 511 1173 1307 -133.4 -10.2 hinctot2 Portland 610 1519 1442 77.0 5.3 hinctot2 Total respondent income as a percentage of total household inome (%) Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 81.5 79.4 2.0 2.5 in2phin2 Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 80.0 79.4 0.5 0.7 in2phin2 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 69.5 69.9 -0.4 -0.5 in2phin2 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 70.3 69.9 0.4 0.6 in2phin2 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 72.8 71.2 1.6 2.3 in2phin2 Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 72.6 72.2 0.4 0.6 in2phin2 Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 70.7 72.2 -1.4 -2.0 in2phin2 Columbus Integrated 728 76.3 74.9 1.4 1.8 in2phin2 Columbus Traditional 723 74.0 74.9 -0.9 -1.2 in2phin2 Detroit 426 82.1 81.3 0.8 0.9 in2phin2 Oklahoma City 511 68.0 65.4 2.6 3.9 in2phin2 Portland 610 69.5 70.5 -1.0 -1.4 in2phin2 (continued) Table 7.5 (continued) Sample Program Control Difference Percentage Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%) Total measured household net income ($)b Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 1005 1003 1.80 0.2 hinctot3 Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 1020 1003 16.60 1.7 hinctot3 Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 1327 1363 -35.50 -2.6 hinctot3 Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 1301 1363 -61.90 -4.5 hinctot3 Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 1417 1438 -21.10 -1.5 hinctot3 Lacked high school diploma or basic 1012 1392 1386 5.90 0.4 hinctot3 Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 1435 1386 49.10 3.5 hinctot3 Columbus Integrated 728 1181 1249 -67.60 -5.4 hinctot3 Columbus Traditional 723 1242 1249 -7.00 -0.6 hinctot3 Detroit 426 1161 1127 33.90 3.0 hinctot3 Oklahoma City 511 1201 1338 -137.80 -10.3 hinctot3 Portland 610 1532 1453 78.90 5.4 hinctot3