Content by Keyword: Health Policy

PDF report
Access to Marketplace Plans with Low Premiums on

Access to Marketplace Plans with Low Premiums: The Uninsured and the American Rescue Plan

The American Rescue Plan (ARP) enhances and expands eligibility for advance payments of premium tax credits (APTCs) to purchase Marketplace insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
  • Access to Marketplace Plans with Low Premiums on the Federal Platform: Part II
    export-csvPDF
PDF report
Medicaid Demonstrations and Impacts on Health

Medicaid Demonstrations and Impacts on Health Coverage: A Review of the Evidence

This issue brief examines the effects on coverage and access to care of policies in four major areas of state Medicaid section 1115 demonstrations
  • Medicaid Demonstrations and Coverage Impacts Issue Brief
    export-csvPDF
PDF report
Trends in the Utilization of Emergency Department

Trends in the Utilization of Emergency Department Services, 2009-2018

This report to Congress analyzed 10 years of data to look at trends in emergency department utilization at the national and state levels.
  • Trends in the Utilization of Emergency Department Services, 2009-2018
    export-csvPDF
PDF report
Comparing Insulin Prices in the U.S. to Other

Comparing Insulin Prices in the U.S. to Other Countries

This report presents results from international price comparisons of insulins using a price index approach.
  • Comparing Insulin Prices in the U.S. to Other Countries
    export-csvPDF
PDF report
HHS Secretary's Report on: Addressing Surprise

HHS Secretary's Report on: Addressing Surprise Medical Billing

This report responds to a requirement in Executive Order 13877, "Improving Price and Quality Transparency in American Healthcare to Put Patients First." It describes the phenomenon of a "surprise billing," particularly in the commercial insurance market, the underlying federal and state regulatory frameworks, and recent state actions to address th
  • HHS Secretary's Report on: Addressing Surprise Medical Billing
    export-csvPDF
Report page
7.0 Figures and Tables

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 7.0 Figures and Tables

Figure 1. How System and Individual Components Affect Quality of Care Disparities in Older Adults
Report page
6.0 References

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 6.0 References

Adams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Grant RW, Meigs JB, Soumerai SB, Ross-Dignan D. Medication adherence and racial differences in A1c control. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:916-921. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Healthcare Quality Report, 2008. (2008). Available onlin
Report page
5.3 Implications and Recommendations

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 5.3 Implications and Recommendations

Efforts are needed to address persistent disparities in care based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and gender, and for subgroups at particular risk.
Report page
5.2 Key Findings on Disparities in Care for Older

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 5.2 Key Findings on Disparities in Care for Older Adults

To fill the gap in the literature about consistent disparities in quality of care for midlife vs. older adults, we conducted new analyses, taking advantage of a large, nationally representative sample of Americans evaluated in the MEPS. Analyses showed that racial/ethnic differences were prominent for effectiveness measures, with results favoring
Report page
5.1 Challenges in Assessing Disparities in

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 5.1 Challenges in Assessing Disparities in Quality of Care for Older Adults

A major task of this report—categorization of select measures of diabetes quality of care, along with certain cardiovascular and depression care measures—revealed some important themes in limitations of existing research on disparities, particularly in care for older adults. First, most health care measures for priority conditions in older adu
Report page
5.0 Summary and Recommendations

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 5.0 Summary and Recommendations

This report developed a conceptual model for assessing quality of care disparities among midlife and older adults; summarized key literature findings on quality of care for diabetes, cardiovascular conditions and depression; and conducted quantitative analyses to address disparities in care among midlife and older adults with diabetes and cardiova
Report page
4.4 Discussion

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 4.4 Discussion

The analysis sought to describe the relationship between health insurance coverage and the quality of care that men and women experience. The most significant, consistent findings were related to access to care. For the most part, women were significantly more likely than men to report delays in care. Differences were exhibited among midlife adult
Report page
4.3 Results

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 4.3 Results

Table 11 shows the distribution of the key independent variables of interest among the study population. To facilitate the multivariate analyses, only persons with complete data on all analytic variables were included in the study sample (hence, the sample for this analysis differs from the previous analysis reported in Chapter 3.0, which did not
Report page
4.2 Methods

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 4.2 Methods

Nationally representative MEPS data were used to examine the relationship of age, gender and insurance status to quality of care among Americans with diabetes and cardiovascular conditions. Persons with missing education or insurance status data were excluded from the analysis (6 percent each for the diabetes and cardiovascular condition populatio
Report page
4.1 Background

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 4.1 Background

Collectively, diabetes and cardiovascular disease account for nearly 30 percent of all deaths in the U.S. and an estimated $623 billion in direct and indirect medical costs (AHRQ 2008; CDC 2009). These diseases are among the most prevalent chronic conditions in midlife and older adult populations 45 and older. Their impact on overall health and di
Report page
4.0 Association of Delays, Effectiveness and

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 4.0 Association of Delays, Effectiveness and Patient-Centeredness in Health Care With Age, Gender and Insurance Status Among Americans With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Conditions

Report page
3.4 Discussion

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 3.4 Discussion

Although analysis results did not exhibit consistent patterns, several findings are worth noting. The most consistent finding was related to access to care. Women more often reported experiencing one or more delays in care compared to men, and delays were significantly more common among the 45–64 age groups than in the ≥65 age group. These fin
Report page
3.3 Results

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 3.3 Results

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Midlife and Older Adults With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Conditions
Report page
3.2 Methods

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 3.2 Methods

Data
Report page
3.1 Background

Disparities in Quality of Care for Midlife Adults (Ages 45–64) Versus Older Adults (Ages >65). 3.1 Background

Although disparities in the use of health services by race and income have diminished since Medicare's implementation, recent studies suggest that marked health care disparities persist among Medicare beneficiaries. Racial/ethnic minority beneficiaries fare worse than their White counter-parts on numerous measures of health status and care. For ex

Pages