Content by Keyword: Expenditures

  • print
  • email
  • twitter
  • compact
Basic report
Simulation Modeling on Life Care Annuity: Final

Simulation Modeling on Life Care Annuity: Final Report

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Simulation Modeling on Life Care Annuity: Final Report Brenda C. SpillmanThe Urban Institute Christopher M. MurtaughVisiting Nurse Service of New York 2007 PDF Version: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2007/annuity.pdf (41 PDF pages)
  • annuity.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
An Analysis of the Impact of Spend-down on

An Analysis of the Impact of Spend-down on Medicaid Expenditures

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services An Analysis of the Impact of Spenddown on Medicaid Expenditures Leonard Gruenberg and Hillel AlpertThe Long-Term Care Data Institute Brian BurwellSysteMetrics/McGraw-Hill January 1992 PDF Version: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/spddwn.pdf (36 PDF pages)
  • spddwn.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid

A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid Asset Spenddown

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid Asset Spenddown E. Kathleen Adams, SysteMetrics/McGraw-Hill Mark R. Meiners, University of Maryland Center on Aging Brian O. Burwell, SysteMetrics/McGraw-Hill January 1992 PDF Version
  • syncri.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
Effects of Multiple Admissions on Nursing Home

Effects of Multiple Admissions on Nursing Home Use: Implications for "Front-end" Policies

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Effects of Multiple Admissions on Nursing Home Use: Implications for "Front-end" Policies Korbin Liu and Maria Perozek The Urban Institute September 1990 PDF Version: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/muladmes.pdf (27 PDF pages)
  • muladmes.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
The Economic Impact of Long-Term Care on

The Economic Impact of Long-Term Care on Individuals

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The Economic Impact of Long-Term Care on Individuals
An Analysis of the Impact of Spend-down on

An Analysis of the Impact of Spend-down on Medicaid Expenditures

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid

A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid Asset Spenddown

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Report to the Secretary on Private Financing of

Report to the Secretary on Private Financing of Long-Term Care for the Elderly

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
An Evaluation of the Veterans Administration

An Evaluation of the Veterans Administration Housebound and Aid and Attendance Allowance Program

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Differential Impacts Among Subgroups of

Differential Impacts Among Subgroups of Channeling Enrollees

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Differential Impacts Among Subgroups of Early

Differential Impacts Among Subgroups of Early Channeling Enrollees Six Months After Randomization

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services   Differential Impacts Among Subgroups of Early Channeling Enrollees Six Months After Randomization Executive Summary
Report page
Endnotes

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. Endnotes

1 Information in this section is from Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government field reports written by John Hall et. al. (1997 and 2002) , public documents, and interviews with state officials.
Report page
Other Federal Social Welfare Programs

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. Other Federal Social Welfare Programs

West Virginia spends more on its Medicaid program than any other single area of the state budget except for elementary and secondary education. Several state officials characterized the Medicaid program as an integral part of the West Virginia's health care system. It funds approximately 55 percent of the state's births. West Virginia's Medicaid p
Report page
West Virginia's Response to Federal Welfare

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. West Virginia's Response to Federal Welfare Reform(3)

West Virginia's response to federal welfare reform encompassed three phases. In the first phase, West Virginia officials designed the state's early TANF program to reduce caseloads to minimize financial risks associated with the new block grant structure of TANF and federal penalties for not meeting federal work participation rates. The state expe
Report page
State Budget Development and Implementation

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. State Budget Development and Implementation

West Virginia's executive budgeting model provides the governor and executive agencies with much authority in budget development and implementation. Significant gubernatorial authority includes sole responsibility for establishing revenue estimates, line item veto, and the ability to extend the legislature's regular session if they do not enact a
Report page
West Virginia

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. West Virginia

Population (July 2003): 1.8 Million Total State Expenditures - SFY 2002: $8,150 Million (US Total: $1,073,816 Million) TANF Expenditures - SFY 2002 (% of total): 2.5 % (US: 1.3%) Medicaid Expenditures - SFY 2002 (% of total): 19.8 % (US: 20.8%) (Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau and NASBO 2002 State Expenditure Report)
Report page
Other Federal Social Welfare Programs

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. Other Federal Social Welfare Programs

The state's Medicaid program plays a central role in South Carolina. It provides benefits to 20 percent of the population-including 40 percent of all children-and pays for 50 percent of all births. One-third of the state's senior citizens receive support from the program, and 75 percent of all nursing home beds are paid for by Medicaid.
Report page
South Carolina's Response to Federal Welfare

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. South Carolina's Response to Federal Welfare Reform

South Carolina's welfare reform program - known as the Family Independence Program (FIP) - was implemented in October 1996 as an AFDC waiver. The waiver remained in effect until September 2003. The cash assistance program is limited in duration to 24 months out of 10 years and no more than 60 months in a lifetime. To qualify, a family of two must
Report page
State Budget Development and Implementation

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. State Budget Development and Implementation

South Carolina's budget process is dominated by the legislature. The governorship is one of the weakest in the nation. Until 1977, governors served only one term, so legislators were around much longer and exerted greater influence. In 1993, the Restructuring Act created eight appointed cabinet positions (the positions were elective before then).
Report page
South Carolina

Spending on Social Welfare Programs in Rich and Poor States. Final Report.. South Carolina

Population (July 2003): 4.1 Million Total State Expenditures - SFY 2002: $14,894 Million (US Total: $1,073,816 Million) TANF Expenditures - SFY 2002 (% of total): 0.2 % (US: 1.3%) Medicaid Expenditures - SFY 2002 (% of total): 22.6% (US: 20.8%) (Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau and NASBO 2002 State Expenditure Report)

Pages

Form Approved OMB# 0990-0379 Exp. Date 9/30/2020