|В||Baltimore Co.||Boston||Chicago||Ft. Worth||Milwaukee||Nashville||Philadelphia||Phoenix||St. Lucie Co., FL||West Virginia||Yakima, WA|
|EmployedВ atВ enrollment||81.5||5.9||3.2||15.4||26.3||28.0||7.5||3.0||71.5||5.6||5.8|
|Employed 1 year later||71.8||42.8||40.5||40.5||41.1||42.6||35.8||32.6||72.9||57.0||48.7|
|Difference in employment rates is statistically significant||*||***||***||***||***||***||***||***||В||***||***|
|Receipt of TANF|
|Received at enrollment||24.3||55.6||90.6||91.5||0.6||64.1||91.5||66.9||41.1||78.1||85.0|
|Received 1 year later||15.3||40.9||40.4||42.9||5.1||63.9||58.4||47.3||16.1||36.5||44.3|
|Difference in recipiency rates is statistically significant||В||***||***||***||***||В||***||***||***||***||***|
|Sources: 1999-2002 baseline survey and 2000-03 12-month follow-up survey of Welfare-to-Work enrollees.
Note 1: Data for survey respondents have been weighted to be representative of all WtW enrolleess in the respective sites. Survey item nonresponse may cause the sample sizes for specific variables to be smaller than those shown. Rounding may cause percentages to sum to something other than 100.
Note 2: Data on employment and TANF receipt at enrollment are from the evaluation's baseline survey. Data on employment and TANF receipt one year after enrollment are from the evaluation's 12-month follow-up survey. The results are based on weighted data for respondents to both the baseline survey and the 12-month follow-up survey. Results pertaining to the time of WtW enrollment may differ slightly from the results presented in Exhibit A.2, which are based on weighted data for respondents to the baseline survey.
*/**/*** Difference between the rate of employment or TANF receipt at enrollment and one year later is statistically significant at the .10/.05/.01 level.