Rate Review Justification data are submitted to the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) for rate requests of 10 percent or more. This analysis used only adjudicated requests with effective dates between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012.
A limitation to this method for estimating savings by state is that it assumes that each affected enrollee in these plans paid the statewide average premium, which may not be likely when small numbers of enrollees are affected. Another limitation is that the savings are applied to a full year of premiums, even though many rate increases go into effect mid-year.
State | A: Total Number of Requests Reviewed2 |
B: Total Number of Requests Modified or Rejected |
C: Total Number not Modified |
D: Total Number Withdrawn3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Only includes states with at least one rate increase request of 10% or more 2 Column A=Column B + Column C + Column D 3 Includes re-submissions |
||||
Alaska |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Arizona |
9 |
- |
6 |
3 |
Arkansas |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
California |
9 |
6 |
3 |
- |
Colorado |
6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
Connecticut |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Florida |
6 |
- |
4 |
2 |
Idaho |
5 |
- |
3 |
2 |
Illinois |
9 |
- |
9 |
- |
Indiana |
3 |
2 |
- |
1 |
Kentucky |
2 |
- |
2 |
- |
Louisiana |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
Maine |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
Michigan |
5 |
- |
3 |
2 |
Missouri |
7 |
1 |
6 |
- |
Montana |
7 |
1 |
6 |
- |
Nebraska |
6 |
- |
4 |
2 |
Nevada |
6 |
4 |
- |
2 |
North Dakota |
6 |
2 |
4 |
- |
Ohio |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
Oklahoma |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Oregon |
5 |
4 |
- |
1 |
South Carolina |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
South Dakota |
3 |
1 |
2 |
- |
Texas |
2 |
- |
2 |
- |
Utah |
4 |
- |
- |
4 |
Vermont |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Washington |
12 |
10 |
- |
2 |
Wisconsin |
21 |
2 |
19 |
- |
Wyoming |
2 |
- |
2 |
- |
Total |
154 |
43 |
89 |
22 |
State |
A: Total Number of Requests |
B: Total Number of Requests |
C: Total Number |
D: Total Number |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Only includes states with at least one rate increase request of 10% or more 2 Column A=Column B + Column C + Column D 3 Includes re-submissions |
||||
Alabama |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Alaska |
3 |
- |
3 |
- |
Arizona |
3 |
2 |
1 |
- |
California |
9 |
1 |
8 |
- |
Colorado |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Connecticut |
4 |
3 |
1 |
- |
Delaware |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
Florida |
9 |
1 |
8 |
- |
Georgia |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Idaho |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Illinois |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
Indiana |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
Iowa |
5 |
4 |
1 |
- |
Kansas |
4 |
2 |
2 |
- |
Maine |
3 |
- |
3 |
- |
Maryland |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Michigan |
8 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
Mississippi |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Missouri |
2 |
- |
1 |
1 |
Montana |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Nevada |
3 |
- |
3 |
- |
New Jersey |
6 |
- |
6 |
- |
New York |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
North Carolina |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
North Dakota |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
Ohio |
6 |
- |
5 |
1 |
Oklahoma |
2 |
- |
2 |
- |
Pennsylvania |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
South Carolina |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
South Dakota |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
Texas |
5 |
- |
3 |
2 |
Utah |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Vermont |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Washington |
6 |
1 |
5 |
- |
West Virginia |
5 |
1 |
4 |
- |
Wisconsin |
20 |
- |
15 |
5 |
Total |
136 |
38 |
86 |
12 |
View full report

"ratereview_rpt.pdf" (pdf, 204.59Kb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®