Toward a National Health Information Infrastructure: A Key Strategy for Improving Quality in Long-Term Care. REFERENCES

05/01/2003

  1. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Final Report: NHII-Information for Health: A Strategy for Building the National Health Information Infrastructure. Internet address: http://ncvhs.hhs.gov. November 15, 2001.

  2. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. (Letter to Secretary Thompson reporting on issues related to the adoption of uniform data standards, Feb 2002). Internet address: http://ncvhs.hhs.gov/020227lt.htm. 2002.

  3. Hammond, WE, and Cimino, JJ. Standards in medical informatics. In EH Shortliffe, LE Perreault, G Widerhold and LM Fagan, editors. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 2001. p.212-256.

  4. De Keizer, NF, Abu-Hanna, A, and Zwetsloot-Schonk, JHM. Understanding Terminological Systems I: Terminology and Typology. Methods of Information in Medicine 39:16-21. 2000.

  5. SNOMED International. Clue 5, a browser for SNOMED CT. Chicago: SNOMED International. 2002.

  6. Rector, A. Description Logics. In F Baader, D Calvanese, D McGuinness, D Nardi, P Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Port Chester NY: Cambridge University Press. (In press).

  7. Chute, CG, Cohn, SP, and Campbell, JR. A Framework for Comprehensive Terminology Systems in the United States: Development Guidelines, Criteria for Selection, and Public Policy Implications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 5(6). 1998.

  8. Cimino, JJ. Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century. Methods of Information in Medicine 37:394-403. 1998.

  9. Rector, AL. Clinical Terminology: Why Is It So Hard? Methods of Information in Medicine 38:239-252. 1999.

  10. Chute, CG. Clinical classification and terminology: Some history and current observations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 7:298-303. 2000.

  11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

  12. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. A Report to the Secretary on Classifying and Reporting Functional Status. Internet address: http://ncvhs.hhs.gov. July 17, 2001.

  13. International Council of Nurses. International Classification for Nursing Practice. Geneva: International Council of Nurses, 2001.

  14. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Prospective Payment for Post-Acute Care: Current Issues and Long-Term Agenda. Internet address: http://www.medpac.gov/publications/congressional_reports/Mar01%20Ch6.pdf. 2001.

  15. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. A Report to the Secretary on Uniform Standards for Patient Medical Record Information. Internet address: http://ncvhs.hhs.gov. July 6, 2000.

  16. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. Washington DC: National Academy Press. 1986.

  17. Morris, J, Hawes, C, Fries, BE, Phillips, CD, Mor, V, Katz, S, Murphy, K, Drugovich, ML, and Friedlob, AS. Designing the national Resident Assessment Instrument for nursing homes. The Gerontologist 30:293-307. 1990.

  18. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Long Term Care. Washington: National Academy Press, 2001.

  19. Manard, B. Nursing Home Quality Indicators: Their Uses and Limitations. AARP: Public Policy Institute. December 2002.

  20. Thompson, T. Press Release: HHS Releases Quality Data about Individual Nursing Homes. Internet address: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/20020424.html. 2002.

  21. National Quality Forum. A Commentary On Quality Measures and Risk Adjustment Methods for Consumer Reporting of Nursing Home Quality, Draft February 27, 2002. Internet address: http://www.qualityforum.org/NHappB.pdf. 2002.

  22. Morris, JN, Moore, T, Jones, R, Mor, V, Angelelli, J, Berg, K, Hale, C, Morris, S, Murphy, KM, and Rennison, M. Validation of Long-Term and Post-Acute Care Quality Indicators. A report prepared for Abt Associates, July 15 2002.

  23. Hirdes, JP. Review of Risk Adjustment Methodologies for Long Term Care Quality Indicators. A report prepared for the National Quality Forum. Author: University of Waterloo, Homewood Research Institute: February 18, 2002.

  24. General Accounting Office. Nursing Homes--Public Reporting of Quality Indicators Has Merit, But National Implementation Is Premature, GAO-03-187. Internet address: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03187.pdf. October 2002.

  25. CMS response to the GAO Report. Internet address: http://cms.hhs.gov/providers/nursinghomes/nhi/NH20021029More.pdf. October 22, 2002.

  26. Kane, RA. Long-Term Care and a Good Quality of Life: Bringing Them Closer Together. The Gerontologist 41(3). 2001.

  27. Chomiak, A, Eccord, M, Frederickson, E, Glass, R, Glickman, M, Grigsby, J, Hurd, D, Kowalsky, J, Kramer, A, Lowe, H, McGuire, C, Moore, T, and White, A. Final Report: Development and Testing of a Minimum Data Set Accuracy Verification Protocol, Report Submitted to the Center For Medicare And Medicaid Services, 2001.

  28. Office of the Inspector General. Nursing Home Resident Assessment--Quality of Care. Internet address: http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-99-00040.pdf. January 2001.

  29. General Accounting Office. Nursing Home--Federal Efforts to Monitor Resident Assessment Data Should Complement State Activities. GAO-02-279. Internet address: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02279.pdf. February 2002.

  30. Institute of Medicine. Leadership by Example Coordinating Government Roles in Improving Healthcare Quality. Washington: National Academy Press, 2002.

  31. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Guideline Panel. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 15. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; AHCPR Publication no. 95-0652. 1994.

  32. Bates-Jensen, BM. Quality indicators for prevention and management of pressure ulcers in vulnerable elders. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(8) Part 2:744-751. 2001.

  33. AGS Panel on Chronic Pain in Older Persons. The management of chronic pain in older persons. American Geriatrics Society. Geriatrics. 50:1-20. 2002.

  34. Chodosh, J, Ferrell, B, Shekelle, PG, and Wenger, NS. Quality indicators for pain management in vulnerable elders. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(8) Part 2:731-735. 2001.

  35. Urinary Incontinence of Adults Guideline Panel. Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Acute and Chronic Management, No. 2 (1996 Update). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; AHCPR Publication no. 96-0682. 1996.

  36. Schnelle, JF, and Smith, RL. Quality indicators for the management of urinary incontinence in vulnerable community-dwelling elders. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(8) Part 2:752-758. 2001.

  37. Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders Committee Members. Quality indicators for assessing care of vulnerable elders. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(8) Part 2. 2001.

  38. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Patient Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Revised Edition ed., Washington DC: National Academy Press. 1997.

View full report

Preview
Download

"toward.pdf" (pdf, 237.05Kb)

Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®