Supporting Families in Transition: A Guide to Expanding Health Coverage in the Post-Welfare Reform World. Administrative Strategies and Considerations


Effective implementation of the new Medicaid rules requires procedures that ensure that eligibility for Medicaid is considered when TANF assistance is provided, denied, delayed, or terminated. State procedures should assure that caseworkers are proactive in offering families the opportunity to apply. Families should not be expected to take the initiative to ask about Medicaid. Rather, all those who come to TANF offices should be asked about their health coverage needs and informed of the process for applying for Medicaid and CHIP. Following are suggestions for how to assure such an outcome:

  • Provide Medicaid and CHIP outreach to families at TANF sites. The key to any effort to identify and enroll eligible children and families is outreach. Success in outreach and enrollment requires the involvement of TANF offices and personnel. Families who inquire about or apply for TANF should also receive information about Medicaid and CHIP, including how to apply for these programs. TANF agency staff should be trained to conduct this outreach and education.
  • Place Medicaid/CHIP workers in TANF offices. States are encouraged to place Medicaid and CHIP eligibility workers at TANF offices to take applications and assist in their preparation. This practice is especially important at sites where, by state or local policy, low-income people are often directed to job searches, receive diversion payments, or otherwise receive assistance that may result in their not filling out an application for TANF assistance.
  • Conduct staff training. States can send a strong and clear message to their employees about the importance of Medicaid and CHIP eligibility through special staff training, supervisor reviews, and other mechanisms. Such efforts should call attention to the differences between the TANF rules and Medicaid and CHIP eligibility rules, and to the procedures necessary to ensure that Medicaid and CHIP eligibility are considered. States should consider offering similar training to hospitals, clinics, health providers, child care centers, Head Start programs, WIC offices, community-based organizations, and other programs that come into contact with low-income families and children.
  • Encourage Medicaid application when the TANF application process halts. States should ensure that the Medicaid application process is completed when a family does not qualify for TANF-funded assistance or abandons the TANF application process. It is important to inform families early in the application process about the different eligibility rules for TANF and Medicaid. Otherwise, families may not understand that even if they don't qualify for TANF, their Medicaid application can and should be processed and could well be approved.

    To give an example, a person who applies for TANF might be required to meet an up-front job search requirement before becoming eligible for cash assistance. Although that person's TANF application might be suspended, he or she should be guided to proceed with the application for Medicaid. As another illustration, a parent might not carry through with a joint application if he or she finds a job, thinking that the family is no longer eligible for Medicaid coverage. Rather than just accepting a withdrawal of a TANF-Medicaid application, a state should send a letter informing the family that all or some of its members might still be eligible for Medicaid, laying out the steps the family needs to take to complete the Medicaid aspects of the application, and urging them to pursue application.

  • Educate families. Informing families early in the TANF application process and regularly thereafter about how the Medicaid and TANF rules differ, and reminding them that Medicaid eligibility is not tied to TANF receipt, can help encourage families to submit and complete Medicaid applications. One reason families may not sign up for Medicaid is that they are under the mistaken impression that Medicaid eligibility depends on welfare eligibility. Therefore, states should make clear in all of their informational materials about TANF that coverage under Medicaid and CHIP does not require welfare eligibility and that, no matter whether or not families apply for or receive TANF assistance, they are encouraged to apply for Medicaid and/or CHIP.

    For individuals facing language barriers, states should consider developing culturally-appropriate materials in languages other than English.

  • Simplify application and enrollment. States have considerable flexibility under Medicaid and CHIP to simplify the application and enrollment processes. HCFA(now known as CMS) has provided states with suggestions on how to do so in a letter to state health officials dated September 10, 1998, which can be found on the HCFA(now known as CMS) website (

    Many states have simplified their application and enrollment processes for children under Medicaid and CHIP by shortening application forms, allowing the use of mail-in applications, reducing or eliminating verification and documentation requirements that go beyond Federal requirements, and speeding up processing of applications. States should consider taking similar steps to simplify the application process for low-income families.

  • Coordinate TANF and Medicaid Section 1931 eligibility. The alignment of TANF and Medicaid eligibility requirements for low-income families can greatly facilitate families' participation in Medicaid. Medicaid and TANF requirements can be aligned by taking advantage of the flexibility to modify financial methodologies and standards under Section 1931, loosen the deprivation requirements for two-parent families, and continue certain AFDC waivers. By exercising these options, states can provide automatic Medicaid eligibility for TANF recipients as they did for AFDC recipients prior to the enactment of welfare reform.

    States have begun to take advantage of the flexibility to harmonize TANF and Medicaid eligibility in several ways. For example, several states have adopted earnings disregards in their TANF programs that are more generous than the old AFDC earnings disregards. To ensure that TANF recipients also qualify for Medicaid, many of these states have adopted the same disregards under the Section 1931 eligibility group. With the exception of earned income disregards, the financial rules under the Section 1931 group must be applied to all members of the group, including those families who do not receive TANF benefits.

  • Eliminate or ease the Medicaid resource test. Most states have dropped the Medicaid resource test for children and now, under Section 1931, states have the ability to drop or ease the resource test for parents as well. Taking this step makes it easier to establish Medicaid eligibility, and can also make Medicaid rules more compatible with welfare reform initiatives. Some states that have not dropped their resource requirements under Section 1931 have made their resource rules less restrictive, for example, by exempting the value of a car.

View full report


"welfare.pdf" (pdf, 5.83Mb)

Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®