Report on Alternative Outcome Measures: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Block Grant . Appendix E: Bibliography

Administration for Children and Families. 1997. Final Estimates of JOBS Program Participation for FY 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

American Public Human Services Association. 2000. States Use of Administrative Data for Policy and Program Management (Research Notes: March 2000). Washington, DC: Author.

American Public Welfare Association. 1994. JOBS: Measuring Client Success. Washington, DC: The Institute for Family Self-Sufficiency.

Bane, Mary Jo and David Ellwood. 1983. The Dynamics of Dependence: The Routes of Self-Sufficiency. Cambridge, MA: Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc.

Barnow, Burt S. 1999. Exploring the Relationship Between Performance Management and Program Impact: A Case Study of the Job Training Partnership Act. Baltimore, MD: Institute for Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Bartik, Timothy. 1996. Using Performance Indicators to Improve the Effectiveness of Welfare-to-Work Programs. Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper 95-36. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Behn, Robert D. 1991. Leadership Counts: Lessons for Public Managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Blank, Rebecca. 1997. What Causes Public Assistance Caseloads to Grow? Chicago, IL: Northwestern University.

Brock, Tom and Kristin Hartnett. 1998. "A Comparison of Two Welfare-to-Work Models." Social Science Review.

Brown, Brett and Thomas Corbett. 1997. Social Indicators and Public Policy in the Age of Devolution. Institute for Research on Poverty, Special Report No. 71, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Brown, Brett, Gretchen Kirby and Christopher Botsko. 1997. Social Indicators of Child and Family Well-Being: A Profile of Six State Systems. Institute for Research on Poverty, Special Report No. 72, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Bittner, Janet. 1998. "Do You Really Want to Be Accountable for Results? Musings on Georgias Learnings." The Evaluation Exchange. Volume IV, Number 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives. 1998. 1998 Green Book: Background Material and Data on Programs within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Council of Economic Advisors. 1997. Explaining the Decline in Welfare Receipt, 1993-1996. Washington, DC: Author.

Council of Economic Advisors. 1999. The Effects of Welfare Policy and the Economic Expansion on Welfare Caseloads: An Update. Washington, DC: Author.

Dickinson, Katherine and Richard West. 1988. Evaluation of the Effects of JTPA Performance Standards on Clients, Services, and Costs. Prepared by SRI International and Berkeley Planning Associates. Washington, DC: National Commission on Employment Policy.

Forsythe, Dall. 2000. Performance Management Comes to Washington: A Status Report on the Government Performance and Results Act. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.

Freedman, Stephen et al. 2000. National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies: Evaluating Alternative Welfare-to-Work Approaches: Two-Year Impacts for Eleven Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.

Friedlander, Daniel. 1988. Subgroup Impacts and Performance Indicators for Selected Welfare Employment Programs. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Friedman, Mark. 1997. A Guide to Developing and Using Performance Measures in Results-based Budgeting. Washington, DC: The Finance Project.

Gallagher, Jerome et al. 1998. One Year After Welfare Reform: A Description of State Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Decisions as of October 1997. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Hamilton, Gayle et al. 1997. National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies: Evaluating Alternative Welfare-to-Work Approaches: Two-Year Findings on the Labor Force Attachment and Human Capital Development Programs in Three Sites. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.

Hamilton, Gayle and Susan Scrivner. 1999. Promoting Participation: How to Increase Involvement in Welfare-to-Work Activities. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Hatry, Harry P. 1999. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

Heckman, James, Jeffrey A. Smith and Christopher Taber. 1996. What Do Bureaucrats Do? The Effects of Performance Standards and Bureaucratic Preferences on Acceptance into the JTPA Program. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Horsch, Karen. 1996 (a). Resource Guide of Results-Based Accountability Efforts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Horsch, Karen. 1996 (b). "Results-Based Accountability Systems: Opportunities and Challenges." The Evaluation Exchange. Volume II, Number 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Hyland, Jill. 1997. Restructuring and Reinventing State Workforce Development Systems. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

Interstate Conference of Employment Security Agencies. 1999. Workforce Investment Act: Guidelines for Reporting and Management Information Systems. Washington, DC.

Jensen, Martin. 1997. Building State Systems Based on Performance. The Workforce Development Experience. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

Koshel, Jeff. 1997. Indicators as Tools for Managing and Evaluating Programs at the National, State, and Local Levels of Government. Institute for Research on Poverty, Special Report No. 73, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Lewis, Ann and Margaret Dunkle. 1996. The New Oregon Trail: Accountability for Results. Washington, DC: The Institute for Educational Leadership.

Martin, Lawrence and Peter Kettner. 1996. Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach. New York, NY: Sage Publications.

Pavetti, LaDonna. 1993. The Dynamics of Welfare and Work: Exploring the Process by Which Women Work their Way Off Welfare. Harvard University Doctoral Dissertation.

Perrin, Edward and Jeffrey Koshel, editors. 1997. Assessment of Performance Measures for Public Health, Substance Abuse, and Mental Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Popovich, Mark. 1996. Toward Results-Oriented Intergovernmental Systems: An Historical Look at the Development of the Oregon Option Benchmarks. Washington, DC: The Alliance for Redesigning Government.

Schilder, Diane. 1998. "Aiming for Accountability: Lessons Learned from Eight States? The Evaluation Exchange. Volume IV, Number 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Scrivner, Susan et al. 1998. National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies: Evaluating Alternative Welfare-to-Work Approaches: Implementation, Participation Patterns, Costs and Two-Year Impacts of the Portland (Oregon) Welfare-to-Work Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.

Simon, Martin. 1998. An Update on State Workforce Development Reforms. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

Social Policy Research Associates. 1997. Workforce Development Performance Measurement: Options for Performance Measures. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.

Social Policy Research Associates. 1997. What Do Customers Want? A Review of Customer Goals for Workforce Development Programs. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.

State of California, State Job Training Coordinating Council. 1999. Overview of the Performance-Based Accountability System. www.sjtcc.cahwnet.gov/pba/.

Trott, Charles E. and John Baj. 1997. Building State Systems Based on Performance: The Workforce Development Experience, A Guide for States. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

Urban Institute. 1980. Performance Measurement. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1994. Report to Congress: Recommendations on Performance Standards for the JOBS Program. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1998. Formula for Awarding the First High Performance Bonus in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. Memorandum No. TANF-ACF-PI-98-1. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1999. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program: Second Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program: Third Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Bonus to Reward States for High Performance under the TANF Program; Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol 65, No. 169. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families.

U.S. Department of Labor. 1999. Consultation Paper on Awarding Incentive Grants and Applying Sanctions for Title I Programs Under Sections 503 and 136 of the Workforce Investment Act; Notice. Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 80. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration.

U.S. Department of Labor. 1999. Consultation Paper on Performance Accountability Measurement for the Workforce Investment System Under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act; Notice. Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 56. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration.

U.S. Department of Labor. 1999. Workforce Development Performance Measurement Initiative: Final Report. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration.

U.S. Department of Labor. 2000. Workforce Investment Act; Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol 65, No. 156. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1997a. Managing for Results: Analytic Challenges in Measuring Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1997b. Managing for Results: Using GPRA to Assist Congressional and Executive Branch Decisionmaking; statement of James F. Hinchman, Acting Comptroller General of the United States, February 12, 1997, before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (GAO/T-GGS-97-43).

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Welfare to Work: Current AFDC Program Not Sufficiently Focused on Employment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1995. Welfare to Work: Measuring Outcomes for JOBS Participants. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Yates, Jessica. 1997. Performance Management in Human Services. Washington, DC: Welfare Information Network.

Zornitsky, Jeffrey and Mary Rubin. 1988. Establishing a Performance Management System for Targeting Welfare Programs. Prepared by Abt Associates. Washington, DC: National Commission for Employment Policy.