Medicare Post-Acute Care: Quality Measurement Final Report. REFERENCES

03/29/2001

  1. Liu K, Gage B, Harvell J, Stevenson D, Brennan N. Medicare's post-acute care benefits: background, trends, and issues to be faced. 1999. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. [Full Report]

  2. Gage B. The balanced budget act: implication for post-acute services. 1998. New York, NY, The Commonwealth Fund.

  3. Leibson CL, Naessens JM, Campion ME, Krishan I, Ballard DJ. Trends in elderly hospitalization and readmission rates for a geographically defined population: pre- and post-prospective payment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991; 39(9):895-904.

  4. Manton KG, Woodbury MA, Vertrees JC, Stallard E. Use of Medicare services before and after introduction of the prospective payment system. Health Services Research 1993; 28(3):269-292.

  5. Shaughnessy PW, Kramer AM. The increased needs of patients in nursing homes and patients receiving home health care. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322(1):21-27.

  6. Easton LS, Cogen R, Fulcomer M. Effect of Medicare prospective payment system on a home health agency: changes in patient population and services provided. Applied Nursing Research 1991; 4(3):107-112.

  7. Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, Reinisch EJ, Sherwood MJ, Rogers WH, Kamberg C et al. Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986. JAMA 1990; 264(15):1974-1979.

  8. Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. Early effects of the prospective payment system on access to skilled nursing facilities. OEI-02-99-00400. 1999.

  9. Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare beneficiary access to home health agencies: 2000. OEI-02-00-00320. 2000.

  10. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Medicare and the American health care system: report to the Congress. 91. 1996.

  11. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Medicare and the American health care system: report to the Congress. 110. 1996.

  12. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Medicare and the American health care system: report to the Congress. 113. 1996.

  13. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. December 2000 meeting transcript. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2000. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

  14. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA 1995; 273(1):59-65.

  15. Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, Eilertsen TB, Hrincevich CA, Tropea DA et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke: a comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA 1997; 277(5):396-404.

  16. Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M, Blewett L, Burns R, Moskowitz M. Functional outcomes of posthospital care for stroke and hip fracture patients under Medicare. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1998; 46:1525-1533.

  17. Anderson C, Rubenach S, Mhurchu CN, Clark M, Spencer C. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial: I: health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke 2000; 31(5):1024-1031.

  18. Anderson C, Mhurchu CN, Rubenach S, Clark M, Spencer C. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial: II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke 2000; 31(5):1032-1037.

  19. Johnson MF, Kramer AM, Lin MK, Kowalsky JC, Steiner JF. Outcomes of older persons receiving rehabilitation for medical and surgical conditions compared with hip fracture and stroke. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2000; 48(11):1389-1397.

  20. Rogers JC, Gwinn SM, Holm MB. Comparing activities of daily living assessment instruments: FIM, MDS, OASIS, MDS-PAC. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 2001; 18(3):1-25.

  21. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. September 2000 meeting transcript. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2000. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

  22. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB. Post-stroke rehabilitation: clinical practice guideline no. 16. 1995. Rockville, MD, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

  23. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31(6):1429-1438.

  24. Hart RG, Benavente O. Stroke: part I. A clinical update on prevention. American Family Physician 1999; 59(9):2475-2482.

  25. Barnett HJ, Eliasziw M, Meldrum HE. Drugs and surgery in the prevention of ischemic stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 332(4):238-248.

  26. Barker WH, Zimmer JG, Jackson Hall W, Ruff BC, Freundlich CB, Eggert GM. Rates, patterns, causes and costs of hospitalization of nursing home residents: a population-based study. American Journal of Public Health 1994; 84(10):1615-1620.

  27. Kayser-Jones JS, Wiener CL, Barbaccia JC. Factors contributing to the hospitalization of nursing home residents. Gerontologist 1989; 29(4):502-510.

  28. Gage B. Impact of the BBA on post-acute utilization. Health Care Financing Review 1999; 20(4):103-126.

  29. Lee AJ, Huber JH, Stason WB. Poststroke rehabilitation in older Americans: the Medicare experience. Medical Care 1996; 34(8):811-825.

  30. Lee AJ, Huber JH, Stason WB. Factors contributing to practice variation in post-stroke rehabilitation. Health Services Research 1997; 32(2):197-221.

  31. Liu K, Gage B, Kramer A. Medicare post-acute care quality measurement: selecting and evaluating eight targeted conditions. 1998. Washington, DC, The Urban Institute.

  32. Kramer A, Eilertsen T, Holthaus D, Johnson M, Gage B. Medicare post-acute care quality measurement: selecting the targeted conditions. 1998. Denver, CO, Center on Aging, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

  33. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Health care spending and the Medicare program: a data book. July 1998 ed. 1998.

  34. Harrington D, Summers PR, Curtis M, Maynard R. Study of the resident assessment information system. 1996. San Francisco, CA, University of California, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences.

  35. Committee on Improving Quality in Long-Term Care, Institute of Medicine, Department of Health and Human Services. Improving the quality of long-term care. Wunderlich GS, Kohler PO, editors. 2000. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.

  36. Guyatt G, Cook D. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA 1994; 272(8):630-631.

  37. Frank L, Kleinman L, Kline N, Legro M, Shikiar R, Revicki D. Defining and measuring quality of life in medicine. JAMA 1998; 279(6):429-430.

  38. Guyatt G. Insights and limitations from health-related quality-of-life research. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1997; 12:720-721.

  39. Berlowitz D, Du W, Kazis L, Lewis S. Health-related quality of life of nursing home residents: differences in patient and provider perceptions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1995; 43(7):799-802.

  40. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 118(8):622-629.

  41. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care 1992; 30(6):473-481.

  42. Bergner M, Bobbitt R, Carter W, Gilson B. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 1981; 19(8):787-805.

  43. Gerety M, Cornell J, Mulrow C, Tuley M, Hazuda H, Lichtenstein M et al. The sickness impact profile for nursing homes. Journals of Gerontology 1994; 49(1):M2-M8.

  44. Kaplan R, Bush J, Berry C. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Services Research 1976; 11:478-507.

  45. Stadnyk K, Calder J, Rockwood K. Testing the measurement properties of the short form-36 health survey in a frail elderly population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998; 51(10):827-835.

  46. Wolinsky FD, Wan GJ, Tierney WM. Changes in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults. Medical Care 1998; 36(11):1589-1598.

  47. McHorney C. Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 health survey. Geronotologist 1996; 36(5):571-583.

  48. Linacre J, Heinemann A, Wright B, Granger C, Hamilton B. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75:127-132.

  49. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965; 14:61-65.

  50. Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9:179-186.

  51. Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, Jaffe M, Ford A et al. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185:914-919.

  52. Finch M, Kane R, Philp I. Developing a new metric for ADLs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1995; 43(8):877-884.

  53. Wolinsky FD, Johnson RJ. The use of health services by older adults. Journals of Gerontology 1991; 46(6):S345-S357.

  54. Fitzgerald J, Smith D, Martin D, Freedman J, Wolinsky F. Replication of the multidimensionality of activities of daily living. Journals of Gerontology 1993; 48(1):S28-S31.

  55. Fitti J, Kovar M. The supplement on aging to the 1984 national health interview survey. US Government Printing Office, editor. 87-1323. 1987. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services.

  56. Kramer A. Outcomes for stroke and hip fracture patients in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Presented at Beyond the Water’s Edge: Charting the Course of Managed Care for People with Disabilities. St. Michaels, MD. November 1996. [Executive Summary]

  57. Wolinsky FD, Callahan CM, Fitzgerald JF, Johnson RJ. The risk of nursing home placement and subsequent death among older adults. Journals of Gerontology 1992; 47(4):S173-S182.

  58. Kramer AM. Rehabilitation care and outcomes from a patient's perspective. Medical Care 1997; 35(6):JS48-JS57.

  59. Radloff L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977; 1:385-401.

  60. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1960; 23:56-62.

  61. Beck A, Steer R, Garbin M. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 1988; 8:77-100.

  62. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1983; 17:37-49.

  63. Lesher E, Berryhill J. Validation of the geriatric depression scale-short form among inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1994; 50:256-260.

  64. Lyness J, Noel T, Cox C, King D, Conwell Y, Cain E. Screening for depression in elderly primary care patients: a comparison of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale and the geriatric depression scale. Archives of Internal Medicine 1997; 157:-449.

  65. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Opzoomer MA, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69:583-590.

  66. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. Journal of Chronic Disability 1987; 40(6):491-499.

  67. Pilowsky I, Bassett D, Barrett R, Petrovic L, Minniti R. The illness behavior assessment schedule: reliability and validity. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 1983; 13:11-28.

  68. Zung WK. A self-rating pain and distress scale. Psychosomatics 1983; 24:887-894.

  69. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1:277-299.

  70. Sherbourne C. Pain measures. In: Stewart A, Ware Jr J, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham, NC, Duke University Press; 1992: 220-234.

  71. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O'Brien J. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66(8):271-273.

  72. Cleary P, McNeil B. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988; 25(1):25-36.

  73. Covinsky K, Rosenthal G, Chren M, Justice A, Fortinsky R, Plamer R et al. The relation between health status changes and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1998; 13(4):223-229.

  74. Nelson E, Hays R, Larson C, Batalden P. The patient judgment system: reliability and validity. QRB: Quality Review Bulletin 1989; 15(6):185-191.

  75. Heinemann A, Bode R, Cichowski K, Kan E. Measuring patient satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement 1997; 1(4):52-65.

  76. Guyatt G, Nogradi S, Halcrow S, Singer J, Sullivan M, Fallen E. Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in heart failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989; 4:101-107.

  77. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1975; 23:433-441.

  78. Smyer M, Hofland B, Jonas E. Validity study of the short portable mental status questionnaire for the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1979; 27:263-269.

  79. Lesher E, Whelihan W. Reliability of mental status instruments administered to nursing home residents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1986; 54:726-727.

  80. Pfeiffer E, Johnson T, Chiofolo R. Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1981; 29:433-437.

  81. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12(3):189-198.

  82. Multidimensional functional assessment: the OARS methodology. Durham, NC, Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. 1978.

  83. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disability 1987; 40(5):373-383.

  84. Fine M, Hanusa B, Lave J, Singer D, Stone R, Weissfeld L et al. Comparison of a disease-specific and a generic severity of illness measure for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1995; 10:359-368.