-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 1. Labor Force Attachment
-
Figure WORK 1. Percentage of Individuals in Families with Labor Force Participants, by Race/Ethnicity: 2002Source: Unpublished tabulations of March CPS data.
- In 2002, 71 percent of the total population lived in families with at least one person working on a full-time, full-year basis, as shown in Table WORK 1a. The percent of full-time full-year workers was slightly lower than in 2001, although still higher than during most of the 1990s, as shown in Table WORK 1b.
- Overall, 14 percent of the population lived in families with no labor force participants and 15 percent lived in families with part-time and/or part-year labor force participants in 2002.
- Persons of Hispanic origin were less likely than non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks to live in families with no one in the labor force in 2002 (10 percent compared to 15 and 17 percent, respectively).
- Working-age women in 2002 were more likely than working-age men to live in families with no one in the labor force (9 percent compared to 7 percent), as shown in Table Work 1a. Men were more likely than women to live in families with at least one full-time, full-year worker (80 percent compared to 76 percent).
Table WORK 1a. Percentage of Individuals in Families with Labor Force Participants, by Race/Ethnicity and Age: 2002
No One in LFDuring YearAt Least One in LFNo One FT/FYAt Least OneFT/FY WorkerAll Persons 14.2 14.7 71.1 Racial/Ethnic Categories Non-Hispanic White 15.0 13.9 71.1 Non-Hispanic Black 17.3 18.0 64.7 Hispanic 9.7 15.4 74.9 Age Categories Children Ages 0-5 5.5 16.2 78.3 Children Ages 6-10 5.9 14.8 79.3 Children Ages 11-15 5.9 13.6 80.5 Women Ages 16-64 8.8 15.5 75.7 Men Ages 16-64 6.8 13.7 79.5 Adults Age 65 and over 65.5 14.3 20.2 Note: Full-time, full-year workers are defined as those who usually worked for 35 or more hours per week, for at least 50 weeks in a given year. Part-time and part-year labor force participation includes part-time workers and individuals who are unemployed, laid off, and/or looking for work for part or all of the year. This indicator represents annual measures of labor force participation, and thus cannot be compared to monthly measures of labor force participation in Indicator 2.
Persons of Hispanic ethnicity may be of any race. Beginning in 2002, estimates for Whites and Blacks are for persons reporting a single-race only. Persons who reported more than one race, such as “White and Asian,” are included in the total for all persons but are not shown under any race category. Due to small sample size, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians and Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders also are included in the total for all persons but are not shown separately.
Source: Unpublished tabulations of March CPS data.
Table WORK 1b. Percentage of Individuals in Families with Labor Force Participants: 1990-2002
No One in LFDuring YearAt Least One in LFNo One FT/FYAt Least OneFT/FY Worker1990 13.7 18.1 68.3 1991 14.3 18.7 67.0 1992 14.3 18.6 67.1 1993 14.2 18.6 67.3 1994 14.0 17.7 68.3 1995 13.8 17.0 69.2 1996 13.6 16.7 69.7 1997 13.5 16.3 70.2 1998 13.3 15.3 71.4 1999 13.1 14.6 72.3 2000 13.1 13.9 73.0 2001 13.9 14.3 71.7 2002 14.2 14.7 71.1 See above for note and source.
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 2. Employment Among the Low-skilled
-
Figure WORK 2. Percentage of All Persons Ages 18 to 65 with No More than a High School Education Who Were Employed: 1969-2002
Source: ASPE tabulations of March CPS data.
- Employment rates for women with a high school education or less continued to drop in 2002, following several years of rising employment, particularly among non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women. Low-skilled non-Hispanic white women continued to have the highest employment level (70 percent in 2002) among the three racial/ethnic groups.
- Employment levels for non-Hispanic white and Hispanic men with no more than a high school education have remained close to 85 percent for nearly to two decades. In contrast, employment levels for low-skilled non-Hispanic black men have varied over the same period. Between 1968 and 1983, employment rates for non-Hispanic black men with no more than high school education fell by 20 percentage points. Since 2000, these rates have fallen by more than 5 percentage points.
- As shown in Figure and Table WORK 2, employment levels for non-Hispanic black men with a high school education or less were 3 percentage points higher than those of similarly educated non-Hispanic black women in 2002. In contrast, there was a 13 percentage point difference in employment levels of non-Hispanic white men and women with a high school education or less, and a 28 percentage point difference between similarly educated Hispanic men and women.
Table WORK 2. Percentage of All Persons Ages 18 to 65 with No More than a High School Education Who Were Employed: 1969-2002
Men Women Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic 1968 92.8 89.9 N/A 55.8 65.8 N/A 1969 92.1 89.2 N/A 56.1 64.9 N/A 1971 90.9 86.1 N/A 55.2 59.4 N/A 1972 91.1 84.3 N/A 55.6 58.1 N/A 1975 88.2 78.8 86.2 58.3 57.2 49.7 1977 88.3 78.1 89.2 61.4 57.6 52.2 1979 88.5 78.7 89.4 62.9 58.9 55.0 1980 88.0 75.2 86.8 64.1 57.6 53.7 1981 87.4 74.5 87.6 64.0 57.5 53.0 1982 85.6 71.1 85.3 62.7 56.6 51.1 1983 84.8 70.2 85.2 63.5 55.3 51.7 1984 86.5 71.9 83.9 65.0 58.9 54.0 1985 86.1 74.6 83.9 66.0 59.4 52.9 1986 86.4 74.3 86.5 66.8 61.0 54.0 1987 86.7 73.9 85.6 67.3 59.9 54.0 1988 86.3 74.0 87.8 68.0 61.4 54.6 1989 87.7 75.3 86.6 68.8 61.1 55.8 1990 87.7 75.6 85.4 68.5 60.7 55.0 1991 86.4 73.9 85.0 68.3 61.0 54.6 1992 85.7 71.5 83.7 67.8 57.8 53.3 1993 84.6 71.2 83.5 68.6 60.0 52.2 1994 85.0 69.1 83.2 69.0 60.9 53.3 1995 85.9 70.1 83.3 69.6 60.1 53.9 1996 85.9 70.3 84.0 70.2 64.1 55.4 1997 85.3 72.0 85.0 69.9 66.6 56.9 1998 85.3 71.8 85.5 70.4 67.1 57.1 1999 84.5 72.0 86.4 71.4 68.4 58.8 2000 84.7 72.7 86.4 70.6 67.7 61.0 2001 83.4 69.9 85.5 69.8 64.8 59.2 2002 82.5 67.3 85.1 69.5 64.4 57.5 Note: All data include both full and partial year employment for the given calendar year.
Persons of Hispanic ethnicity may be of any race. Beginning in 2002, estimates for Whites and Blacks are for persons reporting a single-race only. Due to small sample size, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians and Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders are included in the total for all persons but are not shown separately. Hispanic origin was not available until 1975.
Source: ASPE tabulations of March CPS data.
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 3. Earnings of Low-skilled Workers
-
Figure WORK 3. Mean Weekly Wages of Women and Men Working Full-Time, Full-Year with No More than a High School Education, by Race (2002 Dollars): Selected Years
Source: ASPE tabulations of March CPS data.
- Women’s average weekly wages were lower than those of low-skilled men, across all race groups. In 2002, non-Hispanic white women had the highest average weekly wages among low-skilled women working full-time, full-year ($529). This level is a 15 percent increase over non-Hispanic white women’s 1980 average weekly wages ($459 inflation adjusted). Non-Hispanic black women and Hispanic women’s weekly wages increased at slower rate than non-Hispanic white women since 1980 (12 percent and 3 percent, respectively).
- For men, the gap between mean weekly wages for non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black men with low education levels has narrowed over time. In 1980, the mean weekly wage for low-skilled non-Hispanic black men working full-time was $564 (in 2002 dollars), or 74 percent of the $758 average for non-Hispanic white men. However, full-time working non-Hispanic black men with no more than a high school education received 78 percent of the mean weekly wages of non-Hispanic white men in 2002 ($578 compared to $745).
- Over the past fifteen years, both Hispanic women and men’s wages have lagged behind non-Hispanic whites and blacks among low-skilled full-time workers. In 2002, Hispanic women’s wages were 24 percent lower than non-Hispanic white women and 14 percent lower than non-Hispanic black women. Hispanic men had higher weekly wages than women but still trailed non-Hispanic white men by 29 percent and non-Hispanic black men by 8 percent.
Table WORK 3. Mean Weekly Wages of Women and Men Working Full-Time, Full-Year with No More than a High School Education, by Race (2002 Dollars): Selected Years
Women Men Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic 1980 459 419 392 758 564 572 1981 448 405 397 747 556 562 1982 455 414 397 734 542 542 1983 461 418 398 733 528 554 1984 464 433 404 748 526 558 1985 477 433 397 741 549 547 1986 483 434 419 759 551 532 1987 489 451 404 754 560 528 1988 488 434 402 748 586 531 1989 483 454 411 730 545 512 1990 482 442 387 698 539 497 1991 476 430 386 685 537 478 1992 483 432 400 691 526 489 1993 478 417 387 675 517 474 1994 485 430 389 684 529 469 1995 487 428 376 704 534 469 1996 490 451 388 721 555 466 1997 497 424 397 732 556 502 1998 516 430 400 716 561 498 1999 494 431 392 734 599 495 2000 511 435 382 753 593 505 2001 520 458 400 747 574 509 2002 529 471 404 745 578 531 Note: Full-time, full-year workers work at least 48 weeks per year and 35 hours per week.
Persons of Hispanic ethnicity may be of any race. Beginning in 2002, estimates for Whites and Blacks are for persons reporting a single-race only. Due to small sample size, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians and Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders are included in the total for all persons but are not shown separately.
Source: ASPE tabulations of March CPS data.
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 4. Educational Attainment
-
Figure WORK 4. Percentage of Adults Age 25 and Over, by Level of Educational Attainment: 1960-2002Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Educational Attainment in the United States: March 2002,” Current Population Reports, Series PPL-169, March 2003, and earlier reports.
- There has been a marked decline over the past 40 years in the percentage of the population that has not received a high school education. This percentage fell from 59 percent in 1960 to 16 percent in 2002.
- The percentage of the population receiving a high school education only (with no subsequent college) was 25 percent in 1960 and rose to 39 percent in 1988. Since then this figure has fallen to 32 percent in 2002, although some of this decline is a result of a change in the survey methodology in 1992 (see note to Table WORK 4).
- Between 1960 and 1990, the percentage of the population with some college (one to three years) doubled, from 9 percent to 18 percent. The apparent jump in 1992 is a result of a change in the survey methodology (see note to Table WORK 4), but the trend continued upward, reaching 25 percent in 2002.
- The percentage of the population completing four or more years of college has more than tripled from 1960 to 2002, rising steadily from 8 percent to 27 percent.
Table WORK 4. Percentage of Adults Age 25 and Over, by Level of Educational Attainment Selected Years
Not a High School Graduate Finished High School, No College One to Three Years of College Four or More Years of College 1940 76 14 5 5 1950 67 20 7 6 1960 59 25 9 8 1965 51 31 9 9 1970 45 34 10 11 1975 37 36 12 14 1980 31 37 15 17 1981 30 38 15 17 1982 29 38 15 18 1983 28 38 16 19 1984 27 38 16 19 1985 26 38 16 19 1986 25 38 17 19 1987 24 39 17 20 1988 24 39 17 20 1989 23 38 17 21 1990 22 38 18 21 1991 22 39 18 21 1992 21 36 22 21 1993 20 35 23 22 1994 19 34 24 22 1995 18 34 25 23 1996 18 34 25 24 1997 18 34 24 24 1998 17 34 25 24 1999 17 33 25 25 2000 16 33 25 26 2001 16 33 26 26 2002 16 32 25 27 Note: Completing the GED is not considered completing high school for this table. Beginning with data for 1992, a new survey question results in different categories than for prior years. Data shown as Finished High School, No College were previously from the category “High School, 4 Years” and are now from the category “High School Graduate.” Data shown as One to Three Years of College were previously from the category “College 1 to 3 Years” and are now the sum of the categories: “Some College” and two separate “Associate Degree” categories. Data shown as Four or More Years of College were previously from the category “College 4 Years or More,” and are now the sum of the categories: “Bachelor's Degree,” “Master's Degree,” “Doctorate Degree,” and “Professional Degree.”
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Educational Attainment in the United States: March 2002,” Current Population Reports, Series PPL-169, March 2003, and earlier reports.
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 5. High-school Dropout Rates
-
Figure WORK 5. Percentage of Students Enrolled in Grades 10 to 12 in the Previous Year Who Were Not Enrolled and Had Not Graduated in the Survey Year, by Race/Ethnicity: Selected Years
Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Dropout Rates in the United States: 2000 and earlier years (based on Current Population Survey data from the October supplement).
- With the exception of a small upward movement in 1988, the dropout rates for teens in grades 10 to 12 declined steadily from 1979 to 1991. From a low of 4.0 percent, the rate began rising to a peak of 5.7 percent in 1995. Following this upturn, the overall rate again declined to 4.6 percent in 1997; since then it has fluctuated, moving up to 5.0 percent in 1999 and then back down again to 4.8 percent in 2000.
- Dropout rates among Hispanic and non-Hispanic black teens have fluctuated considerably over this period. Still, dropout rates are generally highest for Hispanic teens and lowest for non-Hispanic white teens. In 2000, the dropout rate was 7.4 percent for Hispanic teens, compared to 6.1 percent for non-Hispanic black teens and 4.1 percent for non-Hispanic white teens.
Table WORK 5. Percentage of Students Enrolled in Grades 10 to 12 in the Previous Year Who Were Not Enrolled and Had Not Graduated in the Survey Year, by Race/Ethnicity: Selected Years
Total Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic 1972 6.1 5.3 9.5 11.2 1973 6.3 5.5 9.9 10.0 1974 6.7 5.8 11.6 9.9 1975 5.8 5.0 8.7 10.9 1976 5.9 5.6 7.4 7.3 1977 6.5 6.1 8.6 7.8 1978 6.7 5.8 10.2 12.3 1979 6.7 6.0 9.9 9.8 1980 6.1 5.2 8.2 11.7 1981 5.9 4.8 9.7 10.7 1982 5.5 4.7 7.8 9.2 1983 5.2 4.4 7.0 10.1 1984 5.1 4.4 5.7 11.1 1985 5.2 4.3 7.8 9.8 1986 4.7 3.7 5.4 11.9 1987 4.1 3.5 6.4 5.4 1988 4.8 4.2 5.9 10.4 1989 4.5 3.5 7.8 7.8 1990 4.0 3.3 5.0 7.9 1991 4.0 3.2 6.0 7.3 1992 4.4 3.7 5.0 8.2 1993 4.5 3.9 5.8 6.7 1994 5.3 4.2 6.6 10.0 1995 5.7 4.5 6.4 12.3 1996 5.0 4.1 6.7 9.0 1997 4.6 3.6 5.0 9.5 1998 4.8 3.9 5.2 9.4 1999 5.0 4.0 6.5 7.8 2000 4.8 4.1 6.1 7.4 Note: Beginning in 1987, the Bureau of the Census instituted new editing procedures for cases with missing data on school enrollment. Beginning in 1992, the data reflect new wording of the educational attainment item in the CPS.
Persons of Hispanic ethnicity may be of any race. Due to small sample size, American Indians/Alaska Natives and Asian/Pacific Islanders are included in the total but are not shown separately.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Dropout Rates in the United States: 2000 and earlier years (based on Current Population Survey data from the October supplement).
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 6. Adult Alcohol and Substance Abuse
-
Figure WORK 6. Percentage of Adults Who Used Cocaine or Marijuana or Abused Alcohol, by Age: 2002
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
- In 2002, young adults (ages 18 to 25) were more likely than older adults to report alcohol abuse, marijuana use, or cocaine use in the past month. More than one in six (17 percent) of adults 18 to 25 reported using marijuana in the past month during 2002, compared with 8 percent of adults 26 to 34 and 3 percent of adults 35 and older. Young adults were also significantly more likely to abuse alcohol than older adults.
- The percentage of persons reporting binge alcohol use was significantly larger than the percentages for all other reported behaviors across all age groups, as shown in Table WORK 6.
- Among all adult age categories, the use of cocaine, marijuana and alcohol abuse increased in 2002 to the highest level in 4 years, as shown in Table Work 6.
Table WORK 6. Percentage of Adults Who Used Cocaine or Marijuana or Abused Alcohol, by Age: 1999 - 20021999 2000 2001 2002 Cocaine Ages 18-25 1.7 1.4 1.9 2.0 Ages 26-34 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.2 Age 35 and Over 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 Marijuana Ages 18-25 14.2 13.6 16.0 17.3 Ages 26-34 5.4 5.9 6.8 7.7 Age 35 and Over 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 Binge Alcohol Use Ages 18-25 37.9 37.8 38.7 40.9 Ages 26-34 29.3 30.3 30.1 33.1 Age 35 and Over 16.0 16.4 16.2 18.6 Heavy Alcohol Use Ages 18-25 13.3 12.8 13.6 14.9 Ages 26-34 7.5 7.6 7.8 9.0 Age 35 and Over 4.2 4.1 4.2 5.2 Note: Cocaine and marijuana use is defined as use during the past month. “Binge Alcohol Use” is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion on at least one day in the past 30 days. "Occasion" means at the same time or within a couple hours of each other. “Heavy Alcohol Use” is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion on each of five or more days in the past 30 days; all Heavy Alcohol Users are also Binge Alcohol Users.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
-
-
Employment and Work-related Risk Factor 7. Adult and Child Disability
-
Figure WORK 7. Percentage of the Non-Elderly Population Reporting a Disability, by Age and Race/Ethnicity: 2002
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey.
- In 2002, non-elderly adults were more likely than children to have an activity limitation, 11.4 percent compared to 7.5 percent.
- While non-elderly adults were more likely than children to report an activity limitation, a higher percentage of children than adults were actually recipients of disability program benefits in 2002 (6.2 percent compared to 4.6 percent), as shown in Table WORK 7.
- Among both non-elderly adults and children, rates of activity limitation were somewhat similar for non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks in 2002, but lower for Hispanics, as shown in Table WORK 7.
Table WORK 7. Percentage of the Non-Elderly Population Reporting a Disability, by Race/Ethnicity and Age: 2002
Activity Limitation Work Disability Long-Term Care Needs Disability Program Recipient All Persons Adults Ages 18-64 11.4 8.5 2.1 4.6 Children Ages 0-17 7.5 NA NA 6.2 Racial/Ethnic Categories (Adults Ages 18-64) Non-Hispanic White 11.9 8.9 2.1 4.4 Non-Hispanic Black 13.7 10.2 2.9 7.7 Hispanic 7.9 5.8 1.6 3.8 Racial/Ethnic Categories (Children Ages 0-17) Non-Hispanic White 7.7 NA NA 6.4 Non-Hispanic Black 9.4 NA NA 7.9 Hispanic 5.9 NA NA 5.0 Note: Respondents were defined as having an activity limitation if they answered positively to any of the questions regarding: (1) work disability (see definition below); (2) long-term care needs (see definition below); (3) difficulty walking; (4) difficulty remembering; (5) for children under 5, limitations in the amount of play activities they can participate in because of physical, mental, or emotional problems; (6) for children 3 and over, receipt of Special Educational or Early Intervention Services; and, (7) any other limitations due to physical, mental, or emotional problems. Work disability is defined as limitations in or the inability to work as a result of a physical, mental or emotional health condition. Individuals are identified as having long-term care needs if they need the help of others in handling either personal care needs (eating, bathing, dressing, getting around the home) or routine needs (household chores, shopping, getting around for business or other purposes). Disability program recipients include persons covered by Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Special Education Services, Early Intervention Services, and/or disability pensions.
Persons of Hispanic ethnicity may be of any race. Due to small sample size, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians and Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders are included in the total for all persons but are not shown separately.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey.
-
View full report

"title-TOC.pdf" (pdf, 275.93Kb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"ch1.pdf" (pdf, 273.62Kb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"ch2.pdf" (pdf, 1.6Mb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"ch3.pdf" (pdf, 2.21Mb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"apa.pdf" (pdf, 7.09Mb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"apb.pdf" (pdf, 124.96Kb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"apc.pdf" (pdf, 1.63Mb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®
View full report

"apd.pdf" (pdf, 104.39Kb)
Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®