Assessment of Approaches to Evaluating Telemedicine. References


Ackerman, Michael. Personal interview. 3 May 2000.

Association of Telehealth Service Providers. October 2000. Telemedicine FAQ. Available at:

Bashshur RL. Rethinking the evaluation and priorities in telemedicine [editorial]. Telemed J. 1998; 4(1):1-4.

Crowe BL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4 Suppl. 1:14-7.

DeChant HK, Tohme WG, Mun SK, Hayes WS, Schulman KA. Health systems evaluation of telemedicine: a staged approach. Telemed J. 1996; 2(4):303-12.

Farand L, Lafrance JP, Arocha JF. Collaborative problem-solving in telemedicine and evidence interpretation in a complex clinical case. Int J Med Inf. 1998; 51(2-3): 153-67.

Finney JW, Brophy CJ, Friman PC, et al. Promoting parent-provider interaction during young children's health-supervision visits. J Appl Behav Analysis. 1990; 23:207-213.

Goodman C. The moving target problem and other lessons from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. In: Szczepura A, Kankaanpaa J, eds. Assessment of Health Care Technologies: Case Studies, Key Concepts and Strategic Issues. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1996:29-65.

Grigsby J, Schlenker RE, Kaehny MM, et al. Analysis of expansion of access to care through use of telemedicine. Report 4: Study summary and recommendations for further research. Denver: Center for Health Policy Research. 1994.

Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Review 1995;17(1):115-31.

Grigsby J, Schlenker RE, Kaehny MM, Shaughnessy PW, Sandberg EJ. Analytic framework for evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J. 1995 (1); 1: 31-39.

Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J. 2000; 6(1):5-13.

Institute for the Future. Health & Health Care 2010. The Forecast, the Challlenge. Princeton, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

Institute of Medicine. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. Field MJ, ed. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996.

Kennedy M. Telemedicine: promising tool or Pandora's box? WMJ. 1998; 97(1): 26-8.

The Lewin Group. Outlook for Medical Technology Innovation. Report 3: Technology Assessment by Public and Private Payers. Washington, D.C: AdvaMed, 2000.

Mintzer CL, Wasem CJ, Puskin DS. Program activity in the second year of the Rural Telemedicine Grant Program Part 2. Telemed Today. 1997; 5(6):32-3.

Nitzkin JL, Zhu N, Marier RL. Reliability of telemedicine examination. Telemed J. 1997; 3(2):141-57.

Ohinmaa A, Hailey D, Roine R. The Assessment of Telemedicine: General Principles and a Systematic Review. INAHTA Project on Telemedicine. Finnish Office for Health Care Technology Assessment and Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, 1999.

Rendina MC. A net present value analysis of neonatal telecardioldogy. Telemed Today 2000;April:23-25.

Sisk JE, Sanders JH. A proposed framework for economic evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J. 1998; 4(1):31-7.

Simonian SJ, Tarnowski KJ, Park A, Bekeny P. Child, parent, and physician perceived satisfaction with pediatric outpatient visits. Devel Behav Ped. 1993; 14:6-12.

Siwicki B. Measuring the benefits of telemedicine. Health Data Manag. 1997; 5(11): 79-80, 82, 84.

Taylor P. A survey of research in telemedicine 1: Telemedicine systems. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4(1): 1-17.

Taylor P. A survey of research in telemedicine 2: Telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4(2): 63-71.

Telemedicine 2000 Buyer's Guide & Directory. Telemed Today 2000;(Special Issue).

Whitten P, Kingsley C, Grigsby J. Results of a meta-analysis of cost-benefit research is this a question worth asking? J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S4-6.

Wolf MH, Putnam SM, James AS, Stiles WB. The medical interview satisfaction scale: Development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physical behavior. J Behav Med. 1978; 1:391-401.

Yellowlees P. Practical evaluation of telemedicine systems in the real world. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4 Suppl 1:56-57.

View full report


"index.pdf" (pdf, 198.19Kb)

Note: Documents in PDF format require the Adobe Acrobat Reader®. If you experience problems with PDF documents, please download the latest version of the Reader®