National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies: 2-Year Child Outcomes Study (COS) Files: Impacts on the measure of whether the focal child was in very good or excellent health, for the subgroups based on the total number of composite risks

09/10/2001

NOTE:

FULTON COUNTY= ATLANTA

KENT COUNTY= GRAND RAPIDS



logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98
                                              09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 565
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 292
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 277.85361754
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2     Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       249     235.05296
      2  0: No         43      42.80066

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory
variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             240.762       250.968         .
SC              244.439       284.058         .
-2 LOG L        238.762       232.968        5.794 with 8 DF (p=0.6703)
Score              .             .           5.877 with 8 DF (p=0.6610)


NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination
of other variables as shown.

      J = 0


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        3.1352      1.7100        3.3614        0.0667               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.4665      0.8435        0.3058        0.5802       -0.056253       0.627    BLACK
AGEP        1       -0.0504      0.0337        2.2360        0.1348       -0.148244       0.951    Age at
Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       0.00213     0.00238        0.8012        0.3707        0.109765       1.002    AVG
ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0409      0.0512        0.6386        0.4242       -0.100709       0.960    # OF
MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.4469      0.3389        1.7390        0.1873        0.119829       1.564
Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1      -0.00641      0.0177        0.1317        0.7167       -0.033836       0.994    B:
Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.1226      0.4003        0.0938        0.7594        0.031525       1.130    SINGL
PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       -0.4905      0.5968        0.6754        0.4112       -0.065626       0.612    B: No
source of support, 3 types
J           0             0           .         .             .                   .        .       Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98
                                              09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 566
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 61.4%          Somers' D = 0.238
 Discordant = 37.5%          Gamma     = 0.241
 Tied       =  1.1%          Tau-a     = 0.060
 (10707 pairs)               c         = 0.619
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98
                                              09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 567
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

SEE END OF LISTING FOR LOGISTIC REGRESSION PREDICTING HEALTH
FROM CUMULATIVE COMPOSITE RISKS


logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98
                                              09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 568
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 55.5%          Somers' D = 0.126
 Discordant = 42.9%          Gamma     = 0.128
 Tied       =  1.6%          Tau-a     = 0.048
 (102627 pairs)              c         = 0.563
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98
                                              09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 569
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 153     0.8431463     0.0586180     0.5158242     0.9429960
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 140     0.8480531     0.0487408     0.6577999     0.9452715
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 353     0.7450103     0.0396016     0.6195205     0.8529386
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 380     0.7424093     0.0360584     0.6200656     0.8492614
------------------------------------------------------------





Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                              09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998  12
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.FULTONHC
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 292
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 277.85361754
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       249     235.05296
      2  0: No         43      42.80066

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             240.762       252.838         .
SC              244.439       289.606         .
-2 LOG L        238.762       232.838        5.924 with 9 DF (p=0.7475)
Score              .             .           5.981 with 9 DF (p=0.7419)


                                       Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

              Parameter  Standard     Wald        Pr >     Standardized      Odds  Variable
Variable  DF   Estimate    Error   Chi-Square  Chi-Square    Estimate       Ratio    Label

INTERCPT  1      3.2103    1.7197      3.4850      0.0619             .      .     Intercept
BLACK     1     -0.4707    0.8430      0.3117      0.5766     -0.056755     0.625  BLACK
AGEP      1     -0.0505    0.0338      2.2371      0.1347     -0.148542     0.951  Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC    1     0.00213   0.00238      0.8049      0.3696      0.110030     1.002  AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC    1     -0.0422    0.0512      0.6767      0.4107     -0.103807     0.959  # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y  1      0.4584    0.3406      1.8114      0.1783      0.122895     1.582  Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD  1    -0.00664    0.0177      0.1414      0.7069     -0.035053     0.993  B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT   1      0.1159    0.4011      0.0836      0.7725      0.029817     1.123  SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB  1     -0.4863    0.5967      0.6641      0.4151     -0.065069     0.615  B: No source of support, 3 types
B         1     -0.1221    0.3396      0.1292      0.7193     -0.032878     0.885  Human Capital Development


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 61.1%          Somers' D = 0.232
 Discordant = 37.8%          Gamma     = 0.235
 Tied       =  1.1%          Tau-a     = 0.059
 (10707 pairs)               c         = 0.616
Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                              09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998  13
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.FULTONHC
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 732
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 660.21715847
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2     Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       543     491.19447
      2  0: No        189     169.02269

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             753.120       765.555         .
SC              757.715       811.513         .
-2 LOG L        751.120       745.555        5.564 with 9 DF (p=0.7826)
Score              .             .           5.500 with 9 DF (p=0.7887)


                                       Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

              Parameter  Standard     Wald        Pr >     Standardized      Odds  Variable
Variable  DF   Estimate    Error   Chi-Square  Chi-Square    Estimate       Ratio    Label

INTERCPT  1      1.4846    0.9233      2.5852      0.1079             .      .     Intercept
BLACK     1      0.2038    0.4553      0.2005      0.6544      0.020652     1.226  BLACK
AGEP      1     -0.0157    0.0171      0.8490      0.3568     -0.044626     0.984  Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC    1     -0.0008   0.00128      0.3945      0.5299     -0.036483     0.999  AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC    1     -0.0272    0.0325      0.7021      0.4021     -0.049324     0.973  # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y  1      0.0375    0.1800      0.0434      0.8349      0.009826     1.038  Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD  1     0.00541   0.00958      0.3196      0.5718      0.027017     1.005  B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT   1     -0.1526    0.2104      0.5262      0.4682     -0.035507     0.858  SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB  1     -0.2146    0.3262      0.4329      0.5106     -0.029936     0.807  B: No source of support, 3 types
B         1      0.1362    0.1795      0.5762      0.4478      0.035681     1.146  Human Capital Development


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 56.0%          Somers' D = 0.134
 Discordant = 42.5%          Gamma     = 0.136
 Tied       =  1.5%          Tau-a     = 0.051
 (102627 pairs)              c         = 0.567
Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                              09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998  14
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 153     0.8508160     0.0570261     0.5294617     0.9464366
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 140     0.8403164     0.0511597     0.6447113     0.9426279
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 353     0.7318738     0.0411925     0.6002167     0.8448746
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 380     0.7549183     0.0351909     0.6332168     0.8581847
------------------------------------------------------------





Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                           11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 142
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 292
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 277.85361754
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2     Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       249     235.05296
      2  0: No         43      42.80066

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             240.762       252.838         .
SC              244.439       289.606         .
-2 LOG L        238.762       232.838        5.924 with 9 DF (p=0.7475)
Score              .             .           5.981 with 9 DF (p=0.7419)


                                       Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

              Parameter  Standard     Wald        Pr >     Standardized      Odds  Variable
Variable  DF   Estimate    Error   Chi-Square  Chi-Square    Estimate       Ratio    Label

INTERCPT  1      3.2103    1.7197      3.4850      0.0619             .      .     Intercept
BLACK     1     -0.4707    0.8430      0.3117      0.5766     -0.056755     0.625  BLACK
AGEP      1     -0.0505    0.0338      2.2371      0.1347     -0.148542     0.951  Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC    1     0.00213   0.00238      0.8049      0.3696      0.110030     1.002  AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC    1     -0.0422    0.0512      0.6767      0.4107     -0.103807     0.959  # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y  1      0.4584    0.3406      1.8114      0.1783      0.122895     1.582  Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD  1    -0.00664    0.0177      0.1414      0.7069     -0.035053     0.993  B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT   1      0.1159    0.4011      0.0836      0.7725      0.029817     1.123  SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB  1     -0.4863    0.5967      0.6641      0.4151     -0.065069     0.615  B: No source of support, 3 types
B         1     -0.1221    0.3396      0.1292      0.7193     -0.032878     0.885  Human Capital Development


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 61.1%          Somers' D = 0.232
 Discordant = 37.8%          Gamma     = 0.235
 Tied       =  1.1%          Tau-a     = 0.059
 (10707 pairs)               c         = 0.616

************************************************************************************************************************

Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                           11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 143
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 732
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 660.21715847
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       543     491.19447
      2  0: No        189     169.02269

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             753.120       765.555         .
SC              757.715       811.513         .
-2 LOG L        751.120       745.555        5.564 with 9 DF (p=0.7826)
Score              .             .           5.500 with 9 DF (p=0.7887)


                                       Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

              Parameter  Standard     Wald        Pr >     Standardized      Odds  Variable
Variable  DF   Estimate    Error   Chi-Square  Chi-Square    Estimate       Ratio    Label

INTERCPT  1      1.4846    0.9233      2.5852      0.1079             .      .     Intercept
BLACK     1      0.2038    0.4553      0.2005      0.6544      0.020652     1.226  BLACK
AGEP      1     -0.0157    0.0171      0.8490      0.3568     -0.044626     0.984  Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC    1     -0.0008   0.00128      0.3945      0.5299     -0.036483     0.999  AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC    1     -0.0272    0.0325      0.7021      0.4021     -0.049324     0.973  # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y  1      0.0375    0.1800      0.0434      0.8349      0.009826     1.038  Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD  1     0.00541   0.00958      0.3196      0.5718      0.027017     1.005  B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT   1     -0.1526    0.2104      0.5262      0.4682     -0.035507     0.858  SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB  1     -0.2146    0.3262      0.4329      0.5106     -0.029936     0.807  B: No source of support, 3 types
B         1      0.1362    0.1795      0.5762      0.4478      0.035681     1.146  Human Capital Development


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 56.0%          Somers' D = 0.134
 Discordant = 42.5%          Gamma     = 0.136
 Tied       =  1.5%          Tau-a     = 0.051
 (102627 pairs)              c         = 0.567

************************************************************************************************************************

Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs                                                           11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 144
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 153     0.8508160     0.0570261     0.5294617     0.9464366
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 140     0.8403164     0.0511597     0.6447113     0.9426279
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 353     0.7318738     0.0411925     0.6002167     0.8448746
------------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1


   N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------
 380     0.7549183     0.0351909     0.6332168     0.8581847
------------------------------------------------------------






logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1229
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA94
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 255
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 281.78642032
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       215     237.75715
      2  0: No         40      44.02927

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             246.252       260.623         .
SC              249.794       296.036         .
-2 LOG L        244.252       240.623        3.629 with 9 DF (p=0.9341)
Score              .             .           3.670 with 9 DF (p=0.9317)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        0.6894      1.7069        0.1631        0.6863               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1        0.3928      0.6258        0.3939        0.5302        0.056431       1.481    BLACK
AGEP        1       -0.0170      0.0338        0.2536        0.6146       -0.052089       0.983    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       0.00108     0.00236        0.2094        0.6472        0.053564       1.001    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0176      0.0520        0.1147        0.7349       -0.041934       0.983    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.3761      0.3497        1.1568        0.2821        0.108598       1.457    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1        0.0120      0.0188        0.4077        0.5232        0.064842       1.012    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1       -0.2708      0.3910        0.4796        0.4886       -0.076319       0.763    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1        0.1168      0.7229        0.0261        0.8717        0.015338       1.124    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1       -0.0176      0.3387        0.0027        0.9585       -0.005118       0.983    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1230
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 58.9%          Somers' D = 0.194
 Discordant = 39.5%          Gamma     = 0.197
 Tied       =  1.6%          Tau-a     = 0.052
 (8600 pairs)                c         = 0.597
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1231
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA94
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 644
Weight Variable: WGT1422
Sum of Weights: 657.44664081
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2   Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       468     486.55842
      2  0: No        176     170.88822

WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             755.408       765.233         .
SC              759.876       809.910         .
-2 LOG L        753.408       745.233        8.175 with 9 DF (p=0.5166)
Score              .             .           8.355 with 9 DF (p=0.4988)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        2.6354      0.9368        7.9131        0.0049               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.2125      0.4650        0.2088        0.6477       -0.023989       0.809    BLACK
AGEP        1       -0.0424      0.0176        5.7991        0.0160       -0.121016       0.958    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1      -0.00022     0.00130        0.0287        0.8656       -0.011023       1.000    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       0.00526      0.0330        0.0253        0.8736        0.010531       1.005    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.0345      0.1795        0.0370        0.8475        0.009616       1.035    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1      -0.00365     0.00952        0.1471        0.7014       -0.019205       0.996    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1       -0.1302      0.2158        0.3644        0.5461       -0.031355       0.878    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       0.00623      0.3664        0.0003        0.9864        0.000847       1.006    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1        0.0852      0.1801        0.2237        0.6362        0.023740       1.089    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1232
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 56.2%          Somers' D = 0.138
 Discordant = 42.5%          Gamma     = 0.139
 Tied       =  1.3%          Tau-a     = 0.055
 (82368 pairs)               c         = 0.569
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1233
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
153     0.8499899     0.0382205     0.7232012     0.9183812
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
103     0.8407745     0.0440862     0.7068954     0.9106800
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
353     0.7314557     0.0508340     0.5559144     0.8235730
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
293     0.7477155     0.0484122     0.5438446     0.8442593
-----------------------------------------------------------





logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1893
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA150
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2   Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 137
Weight Variable: WGT646
Sum of Weights: 140.39968924
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2   Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       114     116.97684
      2  0: No         23      23.42285



WARNING: Convergence was not attained in 100 iterations.  Iteration control is available with the MAXITER and the CONVERGE options on the MODEL statement.
WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based on the last maximum likelihood iteration. Validity of the model fit is questionable.


   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             128.591       129.138         .
SC              131.511       158.338         .
-2 LOG L        126.591       109.138       17.453 with 9 DF (p=0.0421)
Score              .             .          15.224 with 9 DF (p=0.0850)


NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown.

      J = 0

logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1894
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure
WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable.

                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        3.1005      1.9922        2.4223        0.1196               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.2672      0.5273        0.2568        0.6123       -0.068714       0.765    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       99.4443    4.346E21        0.0000        1.0000        8.047449     999.000    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0501      0.0619        0.6542        0.4186       -0.124675       0.951    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       -0.0006     0.00224        0.0712        0.7896       -0.061037       0.999    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.1692      0.0765        4.8875        0.0271       -0.489530       0.844    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1       -0.5512      0.5028        1.2017        0.2730       -0.154302       0.576    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1        0.0424      0.0285        2.2132        0.1368        0.223056       1.043    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.3597      0.5632        0.4079        0.5230        0.098951       1.433    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1        0.8321      1.1525        0.5212        0.4703        0.119578       2.298    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           0             0           .         .             .                   .        .       Labor Force Attachment


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 75.0%          Somers' D = 0.504
 Discordant = 24.6%          Gamma     = 0.506
 Tied       =  0.3%          Tau-a     = 0.142
 (2622 pairs)                c         = 0.752
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1895
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA150
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2    Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 283
Weight Variable: WGT646
Sum of Weights: 276.76311478
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       222     216.77953
      2  0: No         61      59.98358

WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             291.351       306.147         .
SC              294.996       342.601         .
-2 LOG L        289.351       286.147        3.204 with 9 DF (p=0.9557)
Score              .             .           3.172 with 9 DF (p=0.9571)


NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown.

      J = 0

logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1896
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        0.7837      1.2976        0.3648        0.5459               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.3015      0.3385        0.7933        0.3731       -0.081139       0.740    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.1305      0.5745        0.0516        0.8202       -0.019512       0.878    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0202      0.0351        0.3312        0.5649       -0.052968       0.980    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1      0.000824    0.000987        0.6971        0.4038        0.094189       1.001    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0174      0.0431        0.1630        0.6864       -0.047027       0.983    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.1113      0.2987        0.1387        0.7096        0.030382       1.118    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1        0.0165      0.0147        1.2568        0.2623        0.092477       1.017    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.0203      0.3545        0.0033        0.9544        0.005456       1.020    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       -0.1616      0.4773        0.1146        0.7349       -0.027018       0.851    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           0             0           .         .             .                   .        .       Labor Force Attachment


Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 55.7%          Somers' D = 0.129
 Discordant = 42.8%          Gamma     = 0.131
 Tied       =  1.5%          Tau-a     = 0.044
 (13542 pairs)               c         = 0.564
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98                                                                                          09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1897
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 64     0.8414441     0.1265718     0.5006852     1.0000000
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 73     0.8273614     0.1328878     0.4500662     1.0000000
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
152     0.7838726     0.0418016     0.6203644     0.8843292
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
131     0.7833376     0.0469123     0.6251188     0.8852611
-----------------------------------------------------------





logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                           12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 565
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2  Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 128
Weight Variable: WGT646
Sum of Weights: 126.48118493
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2  Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       103     101.96039
      2  0: No         25      24.52079



WARNING: Convergence was not attained in 100 iterations.  Iteration control is available with the MAXITER and the CONVERGE options on the MODEL statement.
WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based on the last maximum likelihood iteration. Validity of the model fit is questionable.


   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             126.403       141.150         .
SC              129.255       172.523         .
-2 LOG L        124.403       119.150        5.253 with 10 DF (p=0.8737)
Score              .             .           4.925 with 10 DF (p=0.8961)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        2.7433      1.8984        2.0882        0.1484               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       0.00227      0.5343        0.0000        0.9966        0.000565       1.002    BLACK
HISPANIC    1         100.8    7.867E21        0.0000        1.0000        4.765577     999.000    HISPANIC
AGEP        1      -0.00412      0.0549        0.0056        0.9402       -0.010821       0.996    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       0.00233     0.00220        1.1196        0.2900        0.241037       1.002    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0798      0.0789        1.0252        0.3113       -0.232168       0.923    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1       -0.2172      0.4771        0.2072        0.6490       -0.059413       0.805    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1      -0.00880      0.0253        0.1209        0.7280       -0.046525       0.991    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1       -0.8237      0.5103        2.6053        0.1065       -0.225700       0.439    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1        0.2531      0.8698        0.0847        0.7710        0.040175       1.288    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1       -0.2187      0.4737        0.2131        0.6444       -0.060078       0.804    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                           12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 566
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure
WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable.

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 63.5%          Somers' D = 0.278
 Discordant = 35.8%          Gamma     = 0.280
 Tied       =  0.7%          Tau-a     = 0.088
 (2575 pairs)                c         = 0.639
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                           12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 567
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2  Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 310
Weight Variable: WGT646
Sum of Weights: 300.54155119
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1: Yes       237     229.85956
      2  0: No         73      70.68200

WARNING: 3 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             329.868       345.253         .
SC              333.605       386.356         .
-2 LOG L        327.868       323.253        4.615 with 10 DF (p=0.9154)
Score              .             .           4.687 with 10 DF (p=0.9111)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        1.1983      1.1462        1.0929        0.2958               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.1046      0.3131        0.1117        0.7382       -0.028298       0.901    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.5910      0.4918        1.4441        0.2295       -0.087181       0.554    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0220      0.0307        0.5139        0.4735       -0.060151       0.978    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1      0.000146    0.000916        0.0253        0.8735        0.015031       1.000    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1      -0.00045      0.0400        0.0001        0.9910       -0.001114       1.000    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.3463      0.2796        1.5342        0.2155        0.094114       1.414    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1       0.00419      0.0138        0.0929        0.7605        0.023125       1.004    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.0341      0.3416        0.0100        0.9205        0.009094       1.035    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       -0.4615      0.4194        1.2107        0.2712       -0.078503       0.630    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1       -0.1230      0.2819        0.1902        0.6627       -0.033381       0.884    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                           12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 568
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 58.0%          Somers' D = 0.172
 Discordant = 40.8%          Gamma     = 0.174
 Tied       =  1.2%          Tau-a     = 0.062
 (17301 pairs)               c         = 0.586
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98                                                                                           12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 569
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 64     0.8282141     0.0703233     0.6279341     1.0000000
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 64     0.7873726     0.0832834     0.5670838     0.9701520
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
152     0.7764727     0.0503910     0.6103726     0.8528395
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
160     0.7546322     0.0535761     0.5877223     0.8344934
-----------------------------------------------------------





logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98                                                                                             13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 517
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA76
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2  Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 63
Weight Variable: WGT578
Sum of Weights: 61.481922303
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1:Yes         46     43.878135
      2  0:No          17     17.603787



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC              75.634        81.452         .
SC               77.777       105.027         .
-2 LOG L         73.634        59.452       14.182 with 10 DF (p=0.1649)
Score              .             .          13.064 with 10 DF (p=0.2201)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1       -2.6457      3.0799        0.7379        0.3903               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1        0.7805      1.2284        0.4037        0.5252        0.171281       2.183    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.3531      0.7714        0.2096        0.6471       -0.094927       0.702    HISPANIC
AGEP        1        0.0419      0.0610        0.4708        0.4926        0.142344       1.043    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       -0.0001     0.00221        0.0021        0.9633       -0.012637       1.000    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1        0.0267      0.0967        0.0763        0.7823        0.072273       1.027    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        1.5480      0.7716        4.0252        0.0448        0.424518       4.702    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1        0.0145      0.0355        0.1676        0.6822        0.079868       1.015    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1       -0.1403      0.7591        0.0342        0.8533       -0.038321       0.869    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1        1.3315      1.3889        0.9190        0.3377        0.188025       3.787    B: No source of support, 3 types
B           1       -1.3644      0.6958        3.8452        0.0499       -0.371835       0.256    Human Capital Development
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98                                                                                             13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 518
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 81.3%          Somers' D = 0.630
 Discordant = 18.3%          Gamma     = 0.633
 Tied       =  0.4%          Tau-a     = 0.252
 (782 pairs)                 c         = 0.815
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98                                                                                             13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 519
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA76
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2   Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 511
Weight Variable: WGT578
Sum of Weights: 511.96047642
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1:Yes        367     363.80079
      2  0:No         144     148.15968

WARNING: 4 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             618.002       616.111         .
SC              622.238       662.711         .
-2 LOG L        616.002       594.111       21.891 with 10 DF (p=0.0157)
Score              .             .          21.577 with 10 DF (p=0.0174)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        2.2394      0.7890        8.0554        0.0045               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1       -0.4636      0.2989        2.4064        0.1208       -0.094947       0.629    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.5953      0.2270        6.8790        0.0087       -0.162514       0.551    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0257      0.0177        2.1192        0.1455       -0.084661       0.975    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1      -0.00005    0.000498        0.0120        0.9127       -0.008712       1.000    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       0.00989      0.0301        0.1078        0.7427        0.026727       1.010    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        0.3545      0.2017        3.0902        0.0788        0.097721       1.425    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1       -0.0140     0.00980        2.0305        0.1542       -0.082096       0.986    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.1381      0.2167        0.4058        0.5241        0.038067       1.148    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1        0.0342      0.3776        0.0082        0.9277        0.005028       1.035    B: No source of support, 3 types
B           1       -0.3828      0.2010        3.6272        0.0568       -0.105666       0.682    Human Capital Development
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98                                                                                             13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 520
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 62.7%          Somers' D = 0.261
 Discordant = 36.6%          Gamma     = 0.263
 Tied       =  0.6%          Tau-a     = 0.106
 (52848 pairs)               c         = 0.630
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98                                                                                             13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 521
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB214 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 39     0.8425827     0.1207627     0.6302358     0.9722116
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 24     0.5477889     0.2095612     0.2574493     0.9013531
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
283     0.7492721     0.0753554     0.5388149     0.8863798
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
232     0.6701237     0.0945306     0.3955455     0.8427819
-----------------------------------------------------------





logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98                                                                                            10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 565
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2   Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 162
Weight Variable: WGT694
Sum of Weights: 172.18070232
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1:Yes        139     147.13628
      2  0:No          23      25.04443

WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             144.821       139.062         .
SC              147.909       173.026         .
-2 LOG L        142.821       117.062       25.759 with 10 DF (p=0.0041)
Score              .             .          21.834 with 10 DF (p=0.0160)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1       -3.6803      1.9647        3.5089        0.0610               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1        0.9702      0.8503        1.3016        0.2539        0.231124       2.638    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.2520      0.5863        0.1848        0.6673       -0.056882       0.777    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0155      0.0450        0.1185        0.7307       -0.052624       0.985    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1       0.00143     0.00157        0.8256        0.3636        0.207244       1.001    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0297      0.0744        0.1593        0.6898       -0.088354       0.971    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1        1.8861      0.6257        9.0866        0.0026        0.535883       6.593    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1        0.0661      0.0284        5.4279        0.0198        0.403231       1.068    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.2814      0.5365        0.2751        0.5999        0.078846       1.325    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       -1.2968      0.8123        2.5488        0.1104       -0.169794       0.273    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1       -0.6590      0.4992        1.7426        0.1868       -0.171986       0.517    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98                                                                                            10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 566
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 79.2%          Somers' D = 0.588
 Discordant = 20.4%          Gamma     = 0.590
 Tied       =  0.4%          Tau-a     = 0.144
 (3197 pairs)                c         = 0.794
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98                                                                                            10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 567
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Data Set: WORK.DATA36
Response Variable: CTHLTFD2   Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1
Response Levels: 2
Number of Observations: 528
Weight Variable: WGT694
Sum of Weights: 518.33874669
Link Function: Logit


            Response Profile

Ordered                           Total
  Value  CTHLTFD2    Count        Weight

      1  1:Yes        390     383.41621
      2  0:No         138     134.92254

WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.



   Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0

                            Intercept
              Intercept        and
Criterion       Only       Covariates    Chi-Square for Covariates

AIC             596.398       575.552         .
SC              600.667       622.512         .
-2 LOG L        594.398       553.552       40.846 with 10 DF (p=0.0001)
Score              .             .          41.575 with 10 DF (p=0.0001)


                                               Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

                  Parameter    Standard       Wald          Pr >       Standardized        Odds    Variable
Variable    DF     Estimate      Error     Chi-Square    Chi-Square      Estimate         Ratio      Label

INTERCPT    1        3.4011      0.8207       17.1742        0.0001               .        .       Intercept
BLACK       1        0.1931      0.3126        0.3818        0.5367        0.041546       1.213    BLACK
HISPANIC    1       -0.7806      0.2316       11.3564        0.0008       -0.201186       0.458    HISPANIC
AGEP        1       -0.0617      0.0198        9.7557        0.0018       -0.191493       0.940    Age at Random Assignment-ph2
GYRADC      1      0.000431    0.000517        0.6939        0.4049        0.071417       1.000    AVG ADC PER MO RECVD
YRKREC      1       -0.0388      0.0316        1.5058        0.2198       -0.107136       0.962    # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR
GENDER2Y    1       -0.0291      0.2102        0.0192        0.8899       -0.007954       0.971    Imputed Child Gender 2 year
CHAGERAD    1      0.000302      0.0103        0.0009        0.9767        0.001741       1.000    B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos)
MARSTAT     1        0.1684      0.2313        0.5297        0.4667        0.045521       1.183    SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS
CTSUPRKB    1       -0.3024      0.3714        0.6633        0.4154       -0.044668       0.739    B: No source of support, 3 types
J           1       -0.7162      0.2196       10.6347        0.0011       -0.179164       0.489    Labor Force Attachment
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98                                                                                            10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 568
by cumulative number of composited risks

B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses

 Concordant = 65.9%          Somers' D = 0.323
 Discordant = 33.6%          Gamma     = 0.325
 Tied       =  0.5%          Tau-a     = 0.125
 (53820 pairs)               c         = 0.662
logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98                                                                                            10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 569
by cumulative number of composited risks

Analysis Variable : PROB223 Estimated Probability


 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
110     0.8814308     0.1297743     0.3420258     0.9975566
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:<2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
 54     0.7867103     0.1638633     0.3554996     0.9855947
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
376     0.7780612     0.0948572     0.3739055     0.9157208
-----------------------------------------------------------

 B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1


  N          Mean       Std Dev       Minimum       Maximum
-----------------------------------------------------------
153     0.6391607     0.1344044     0.2364115     0.8392684
-----------------------------------------------------------