NOTE: FULTON COUNTY= ATLANTA KENT COUNTY= GRAND RAPIDS logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 565 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 292 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 277.85361754 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 249 235.05296 2 0: No 43 42.80066 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 240.762 250.968 . SC 244.439 284.058 . -2 LOG L 238.762 232.968 5.794 with 8 DF (p=0.6703) Score . . 5.877 with 8 DF (p=0.6610) NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown. J = 0 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 3.1352 1.7100 3.3614 0.0667 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.4665 0.8435 0.3058 0.5802 -0.056253 0.627 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0504 0.0337 2.2360 0.1348 -0.148244 0.951 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00213 0.00238 0.8012 0.3707 0.109765 1.002 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0409 0.0512 0.6386 0.4242 -0.100709 0.960 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.4469 0.3389 1.7390 0.1873 0.119829 1.564 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.00641 0.0177 0.1317 0.7167 -0.033836 0.994 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.1226 0.4003 0.0938 0.7594 0.031525 1.130 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.4905 0.5968 0.6754 0.4112 -0.065626 0.612 B: No source of support, 3 types J 0 0 . . . . . Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 566 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 61.4% Somers' D = 0.238 Discordant = 37.5% Gamma = 0.241 Tied = 1.1% Tau-a = 0.060 (10707 pairs) c = 0.619 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 567 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks SEE END OF LISTING FOR LOGISTIC REGRESSION PREDICTING HEALTH FROM CUMULATIVE COMPOSITE RISKS logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 568 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 55.5% Somers' D = 0.126 Discordant = 42.9% Gamma = 0.128 Tied = 1.6% Tau-a = 0.048 (102627 pairs) c = 0.563 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 569 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 153 0.8431463 0.0586180 0.5158242 0.9429960 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 140 0.8480531 0.0487408 0.6577999 0.9452715 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 353 0.7450103 0.0396016 0.6195205 0.8529386 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 380 0.7424093 0.0360584 0.6200656 0.8492614 ------------------------------------------------------------ Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998 12 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.FULTONHC Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 292 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 277.85361754 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 249 235.05296 2 0: No 43 42.80066 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 240.762 252.838 . SC 244.439 289.606 . -2 LOG L 238.762 232.838 5.924 with 9 DF (p=0.7475) Score . . 5.981 with 9 DF (p=0.7419) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 3.2103 1.7197 3.4850 0.0619 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.4707 0.8430 0.3117 0.5766 -0.056755 0.625 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0505 0.0338 2.2371 0.1347 -0.148542 0.951 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00213 0.00238 0.8049 0.3696 0.110030 1.002 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0422 0.0512 0.6767 0.4107 -0.103807 0.959 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.4584 0.3406 1.8114 0.1783 0.122895 1.582 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.00664 0.0177 0.1414 0.7069 -0.035053 0.993 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.1159 0.4011 0.0836 0.7725 0.029817 1.123 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.4863 0.5967 0.6641 0.4151 -0.065069 0.615 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 -0.1221 0.3396 0.1292 0.7193 -0.032878 0.885 Human Capital Development Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 61.1% Somers' D = 0.232 Discordant = 37.8% Gamma = 0.235 Tied = 1.1% Tau-a = 0.059 (10707 pairs) c = 0.616 Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998 13 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.FULTONHC Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 732 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 660.21715847 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 543 491.19447 2 0: No 189 169.02269 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 753.120 765.555 . SC 757.715 811.513 . -2 LOG L 751.120 745.555 5.564 with 9 DF (p=0.7826) Score . . 5.500 with 9 DF (p=0.7887) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 1.4846 0.9233 2.5852 0.1079 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.2038 0.4553 0.2005 0.6544 0.020652 1.226 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0157 0.0171 0.8490 0.3568 -0.044626 0.984 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.0008 0.00128 0.3945 0.5299 -0.036483 0.999 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0272 0.0325 0.7021 0.4021 -0.049324 0.973 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.0375 0.1800 0.0434 0.8349 0.009826 1.038 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.00541 0.00958 0.3196 0.5718 0.027017 1.005 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.1526 0.2104 0.5262 0.4682 -0.035507 0.858 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.2146 0.3262 0.4329 0.5106 -0.029936 0.807 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 0.1362 0.1795 0.5762 0.4478 0.035681 1.146 Human Capital Development Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 56.0% Somers' D = 0.134 Discordant = 42.5% Gamma = 0.136 Tied = 1.5% Tau-a = 0.051 (102627 pairs) c = 0.567 Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 09:09 Monday, July 6, 1998 14 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 153 0.8508160 0.0570261 0.5294617 0.9464366 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 140 0.8403164 0.0511597 0.6447113 0.9426279 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 353 0.7318738 0.0411925 0.6002167 0.8448746 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 380 0.7549183 0.0351909 0.6332168 0.8581847 ------------------------------------------------------------ Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 142 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 292 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 277.85361754 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 249 235.05296 2 0: No 43 42.80066 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 240.762 252.838 . SC 244.439 289.606 . -2 LOG L 238.762 232.838 5.924 with 9 DF (p=0.7475) Score . . 5.981 with 9 DF (p=0.7419) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 3.2103 1.7197 3.4850 0.0619 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.4707 0.8430 0.3117 0.5766 -0.056755 0.625 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0505 0.0338 2.2371 0.1347 -0.148542 0.951 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00213 0.00238 0.8049 0.3696 0.110030 1.002 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0422 0.0512 0.6767 0.4107 -0.103807 0.959 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.4584 0.3406 1.8114 0.1783 0.122895 1.582 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.00664 0.0177 0.1414 0.7069 -0.035053 0.993 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.1159 0.4011 0.0836 0.7725 0.029817 1.123 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.4863 0.5967 0.6641 0.4151 -0.065069 0.615 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 -0.1221 0.3396 0.1292 0.7193 -0.032878 0.885 Human Capital Development Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 61.1% Somers' D = 0.232 Discordant = 37.8% Gamma = 0.235 Tied = 1.1% Tau-a = 0.059 (10707 pairs) c = 0.616 ************************************************************************************************************************ Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 143 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 732 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 660.21715847 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 543 491.19447 2 0: No 189 169.02269 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 753.120 765.555 . SC 757.715 811.513 . -2 LOG L 751.120 745.555 5.564 with 9 DF (p=0.7826) Score . . 5.500 with 9 DF (p=0.7887) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 1.4846 0.9233 2.5852 0.1079 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.2038 0.4553 0.2005 0.6544 0.020652 1.226 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0157 0.0171 0.8490 0.3568 -0.044626 0.984 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.0008 0.00128 0.3945 0.5299 -0.036483 0.999 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0272 0.0325 0.7021 0.4021 -0.049324 0.973 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.0375 0.1800 0.0434 0.8349 0.009826 1.038 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.00541 0.00958 0.3196 0.5718 0.027017 1.005 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.1526 0.2104 0.5262 0.4682 -0.035507 0.858 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.2146 0.3262 0.4329 0.5106 -0.029936 0.807 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 0.1362 0.1795 0.5762 0.4478 0.035681 1.146 Human Capital Development Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 56.0% Somers' D = 0.134 Discordant = 42.5% Gamma = 0.136 Tied = 1.5% Tau-a = 0.051 (102627 pairs) c = 0.567 ************************************************************************************************************************ Subgroup Impacts for FU HCDs 11:59 Thursday, July 16, 1998 144 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 153 0.8508160 0.0570261 0.5294617 0.9464366 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 140 0.8403164 0.0511597 0.6447113 0.9426279 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 353 0.7318738 0.0411925 0.6002167 0.8448746 ------------------------------------------------------------ B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ------------------------------------------------------------ 380 0.7549183 0.0351909 0.6332168 0.8581847 ------------------------------------------------------------ logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1229 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA94 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 255 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 281.78642032 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 215 237.75715 2 0: No 40 44.02927 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 246.252 260.623 . SC 249.794 296.036 . -2 LOG L 244.252 240.623 3.629 with 9 DF (p=0.9341) Score . . 3.670 with 9 DF (p=0.9317) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 0.6894 1.7069 0.1631 0.6863 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.3928 0.6258 0.3939 0.5302 0.056431 1.481 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0170 0.0338 0.2536 0.6146 -0.052089 0.983 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00108 0.00236 0.2094 0.6472 0.053564 1.001 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0176 0.0520 0.1147 0.7349 -0.041934 0.983 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.3761 0.3497 1.1568 0.2821 0.108598 1.457 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.0120 0.0188 0.4077 0.5232 0.064842 1.012 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.2708 0.3910 0.4796 0.4886 -0.076319 0.763 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 0.1168 0.7229 0.0261 0.8717 0.015338 1.124 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 -0.0176 0.3387 0.0027 0.9585 -0.005118 0.983 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1230 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 58.9% Somers' D = 0.194 Discordant = 39.5% Gamma = 0.197 Tied = 1.6% Tau-a = 0.052 (8600 pairs) c = 0.597 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1231 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA94 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 644 Weight Variable: WGT1422 Sum of Weights: 657.44664081 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 468 486.55842 2 0: No 176 170.88822 WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 755.408 765.233 . SC 759.876 809.910 . -2 LOG L 753.408 745.233 8.175 with 9 DF (p=0.5166) Score . . 8.355 with 9 DF (p=0.4988) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 2.6354 0.9368 7.9131 0.0049 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.2125 0.4650 0.2088 0.6477 -0.023989 0.809 BLACK AGEP 1 -0.0424 0.0176 5.7991 0.0160 -0.121016 0.958 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.00022 0.00130 0.0287 0.8656 -0.011023 1.000 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 0.00526 0.0330 0.0253 0.8736 0.010531 1.005 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.0345 0.1795 0.0370 0.8475 0.009616 1.035 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.00365 0.00952 0.1471 0.7014 -0.019205 0.996 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.1302 0.2158 0.3644 0.5461 -0.031355 0.878 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 0.00623 0.3664 0.0003 0.9864 0.000847 1.006 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 0.0852 0.1801 0.2237 0.6362 0.023740 1.089 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1232 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 56.2% Somers' D = 0.138 Discordant = 42.5% Gamma = 0.139 Tied = 1.3% Tau-a = 0.055 (82368 pairs) c = 0.569 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for FU LFAs, 6/30/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1233 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 153 0.8499899 0.0382205 0.7232012 0.9183812 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 103 0.8407745 0.0440862 0.7068954 0.9106800 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 353 0.7314557 0.0508340 0.5559144 0.8235730 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 293 0.7477155 0.0484122 0.5438446 0.8442593 ----------------------------------------------------------- logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1893 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA150 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 137 Weight Variable: WGT646 Sum of Weights: 140.39968924 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 114 116.97684 2 0: No 23 23.42285 WARNING: Convergence was not attained in 100 iterations. Iteration control is available with the MAXITER and the CONVERGE options on the MODEL statement. WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based on the last maximum likelihood iteration. Validity of the model fit is questionable. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 128.591 129.138 . SC 131.511 158.338 . -2 LOG L 126.591 109.138 17.453 with 9 DF (p=0.0421) Score . . 15.224 with 9 DF (p=0.0850) NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown. J = 0 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1894 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable. Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 3.1005 1.9922 2.4223 0.1196 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.2672 0.5273 0.2568 0.6123 -0.068714 0.765 BLACK HISPANIC 1 99.4443 4.346E21 0.0000 1.0000 8.047449 999.000 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0501 0.0619 0.6542 0.4186 -0.124675 0.951 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.0006 0.00224 0.0712 0.7896 -0.061037 0.999 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.1692 0.0765 4.8875 0.0271 -0.489530 0.844 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 -0.5512 0.5028 1.2017 0.2730 -0.154302 0.576 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.0424 0.0285 2.2132 0.1368 0.223056 1.043 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.3597 0.5632 0.4079 0.5230 0.098951 1.433 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 0.8321 1.1525 0.5212 0.4703 0.119578 2.298 B: No source of support, 3 types J 0 0 . . . . . Labor Force Attachment Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 75.0% Somers' D = 0.504 Discordant = 24.6% Gamma = 0.506 Tied = 0.3% Tau-a = 0.142 (2622 pairs) c = 0.752 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1895 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA150 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 283 Weight Variable: WGT646 Sum of Weights: 276.76311478 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 222 216.77953 2 0: No 61 59.98358 WARNING: 1 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 291.351 306.147 . SC 294.996 342.601 . -2 LOG L 289.351 286.147 3.204 with 9 DF (p=0.9557) Score . . 3.172 with 9 DF (p=0.9571) NOTE: The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown. J = 0 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1896 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 0.7837 1.2976 0.3648 0.5459 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.3015 0.3385 0.7933 0.3731 -0.081139 0.740 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.1305 0.5745 0.0516 0.8202 -0.019512 0.878 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0202 0.0351 0.3312 0.5649 -0.052968 0.980 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.000824 0.000987 0.6971 0.4038 0.094189 1.001 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0174 0.0431 0.1630 0.6864 -0.047027 0.983 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.1113 0.2987 0.1387 0.7096 0.030382 1.118 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.0165 0.0147 1.2568 0.2623 0.092477 1.017 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.0203 0.3545 0.0033 0.9544 0.005456 1.020 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.1616 0.4773 0.1146 0.7349 -0.027018 0.851 B: No source of support, 3 types J 0 0 . . . . . Labor Force Attachment Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 55.7% Somers' D = 0.129 Discordant = 42.8% Gamma = 0.131 Tied = 1.5% Tau-a = 0.044 (13542 pairs) c = 0.564 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE HCDs, 6/28/98 09:53 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 1897 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 64 0.8414441 0.1265718 0.5006852 1.0000000 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 73 0.8273614 0.1328878 0.4500662 1.0000000 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 152 0.7838726 0.0418016 0.6203644 0.8843292 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 131 0.7833376 0.0469123 0.6251188 0.8852611 ----------------------------------------------------------- logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98 12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 565 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 128 Weight Variable: WGT646 Sum of Weights: 126.48118493 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 103 101.96039 2 0: No 25 24.52079 WARNING: Convergence was not attained in 100 iterations. Iteration control is available with the MAXITER and the CONVERGE options on the MODEL statement. WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based on the last maximum likelihood iteration. Validity of the model fit is questionable. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 126.403 141.150 . SC 129.255 172.523 . -2 LOG L 124.403 119.150 5.253 with 10 DF (p=0.8737) Score . . 4.925 with 10 DF (p=0.8961) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 2.7433 1.8984 2.0882 0.1484 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.00227 0.5343 0.0000 0.9966 0.000565 1.002 BLACK HISPANIC 1 100.8 7.867E21 0.0000 1.0000 4.765577 999.000 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.00412 0.0549 0.0056 0.9402 -0.010821 0.996 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00233 0.00220 1.1196 0.2900 0.241037 1.002 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0798 0.0789 1.0252 0.3113 -0.232168 0.923 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 -0.2172 0.4771 0.2072 0.6490 -0.059413 0.805 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.00880 0.0253 0.1209 0.7280 -0.046525 0.991 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.8237 0.5103 2.6053 0.1065 -0.225700 0.439 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 0.2531 0.8698 0.0847 0.7710 0.040175 1.288 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 -0.2187 0.4737 0.2131 0.6444 -0.060078 0.804 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98 12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 566 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable. Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 63.5% Somers' D = 0.278 Discordant = 35.8% Gamma = 0.280 Tied = 0.7% Tau-a = 0.088 (2575 pairs) c = 0.639 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98 12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 567 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 310 Weight Variable: WGT646 Sum of Weights: 300.54155119 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1: Yes 237 229.85956 2 0: No 73 70.68200 WARNING: 3 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 329.868 345.253 . SC 333.605 386.356 . -2 LOG L 327.868 323.253 4.615 with 10 DF (p=0.9154) Score . . 4.687 with 10 DF (p=0.9111) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 1.1983 1.1462 1.0929 0.2958 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.1046 0.3131 0.1117 0.7382 -0.028298 0.901 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.5910 0.4918 1.4441 0.2295 -0.087181 0.554 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0220 0.0307 0.5139 0.4735 -0.060151 0.978 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.000146 0.000916 0.0253 0.8735 0.015031 1.000 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.00045 0.0400 0.0001 0.9910 -0.001114 1.000 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.3463 0.2796 1.5342 0.2155 0.094114 1.414 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.00419 0.0138 0.0929 0.7605 0.023125 1.004 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.0341 0.3416 0.0100 0.9205 0.009094 1.035 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.4615 0.4194 1.2107 0.2712 -0.078503 0.630 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 -0.1230 0.2819 0.1902 0.6627 -0.033381 0.884 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98 12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 568 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 58.0% Somers' D = 0.172 Discordant = 40.8% Gamma = 0.174 Tied = 1.2% Tau-a = 0.062 (17301 pairs) c = 0.586 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for KE LFAs, 6/30/98 12:23 Tuesday, June 30, 1998 569 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB623 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 64 0.8282141 0.0703233 0.6279341 1.0000000 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 64 0.7873726 0.0832834 0.5670838 0.9701520 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 152 0.7764727 0.0503910 0.6103726 0.8528395 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 160 0.7546322 0.0535761 0.5877223 0.8344934 ----------------------------------------------------------- logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98 13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 517 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA76 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 63 Weight Variable: WGT578 Sum of Weights: 61.481922303 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1:Yes 46 43.878135 2 0:No 17 17.603787 Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 75.634 81.452 . SC 77.777 105.027 . -2 LOG L 73.634 59.452 14.182 with 10 DF (p=0.1649) Score . . 13.064 with 10 DF (p=0.2201) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 -2.6457 3.0799 0.7379 0.3903 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.7805 1.2284 0.4037 0.5252 0.171281 2.183 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.3531 0.7714 0.2096 0.6471 -0.094927 0.702 HISPANIC AGEP 1 0.0419 0.0610 0.4708 0.4926 0.142344 1.043 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.0001 0.00221 0.0021 0.9633 -0.012637 1.000 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 0.0267 0.0967 0.0763 0.7823 0.072273 1.027 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 1.5480 0.7716 4.0252 0.0448 0.424518 4.702 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.0145 0.0355 0.1676 0.6822 0.079868 1.015 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 -0.1403 0.7591 0.0342 0.8533 -0.038321 0.869 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 1.3315 1.3889 0.9190 0.3377 0.188025 3.787 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 -1.3644 0.6958 3.8452 0.0499 -0.371835 0.256 Human Capital Development logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98 13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 518 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 81.3% Somers' D = 0.630 Discordant = 18.3% Gamma = 0.633 Tied = 0.4% Tau-a = 0.252 (782 pairs) c = 0.815 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98 13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 519 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA76 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 511 Weight Variable: WGT578 Sum of Weights: 511.96047642 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1:Yes 367 363.80079 2 0:No 144 148.15968 WARNING: 4 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 618.002 616.111 . SC 622.238 662.711 . -2 LOG L 616.002 594.111 21.891 with 10 DF (p=0.0157) Score . . 21.577 with 10 DF (p=0.0174) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 2.2394 0.7890 8.0554 0.0045 . . Intercept BLACK 1 -0.4636 0.2989 2.4064 0.1208 -0.094947 0.629 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.5953 0.2270 6.8790 0.0087 -0.162514 0.551 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0257 0.0177 2.1192 0.1455 -0.084661 0.975 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 -0.00005 0.000498 0.0120 0.9127 -0.008712 1.000 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 0.00989 0.0301 0.1078 0.7427 0.026727 1.010 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 0.3545 0.2017 3.0902 0.0788 0.097721 1.425 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 -0.0140 0.00980 2.0305 0.1542 -0.082096 0.986 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.1381 0.2167 0.4058 0.5241 0.038067 1.148 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 0.0342 0.3776 0.0082 0.9277 0.005028 1.035 B: No source of support, 3 types B 1 -0.3828 0.2010 3.6272 0.0568 -0.105666 0.682 Human Capital Development logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98 13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 520 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 62.7% Somers' D = 0.261 Discordant = 36.6% Gamma = 0.263 Tied = 0.6% Tau-a = 0.106 (52848 pairs) c = 0.630 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI HCDs, 1/6/98 13:43 Friday, June 26, 1998 521 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB214 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 39 0.8425827 0.1207627 0.6302358 0.9722116 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 24 0.5477889 0.2095612 0.2574493 0.9013531 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 283 0.7492721 0.0753554 0.5388149 0.8863798 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Human Capital Development=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 232 0.6701237 0.0945306 0.3955455 0.8427819 ----------------------------------------------------------- logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98 10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 565 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 162 Weight Variable: WGT694 Sum of Weights: 172.18070232 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1:Yes 139 147.13628 2 0:No 23 25.04443 WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 144.821 139.062 . SC 147.909 173.026 . -2 LOG L 142.821 117.062 25.759 with 10 DF (p=0.0041) Score . . 21.834 with 10 DF (p=0.0160) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 -3.6803 1.9647 3.5089 0.0610 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.9702 0.8503 1.3016 0.2539 0.231124 2.638 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.2520 0.5863 0.1848 0.6673 -0.056882 0.777 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0155 0.0450 0.1185 0.7307 -0.052624 0.985 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.00143 0.00157 0.8256 0.3636 0.207244 1.001 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0297 0.0744 0.1593 0.6898 -0.088354 0.971 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 1.8861 0.6257 9.0866 0.0026 0.535883 6.593 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.0661 0.0284 5.4279 0.0198 0.403231 1.068 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.2814 0.5365 0.2751 0.5999 0.078846 1.325 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -1.2968 0.8123 2.5488 0.1104 -0.169794 0.273 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 -0.6590 0.4992 1.7426 0.1868 -0.171986 0.517 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98 10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 566 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 79.2% Somers' D = 0.588 Discordant = 20.4% Gamma = 0.590 Tied = 0.4% Tau-a = 0.144 (3197 pairs) c = 0.794 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98 10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 567 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Data Set: WORK.DATA36 Response Variable: CTHLTFD2 Maternal rept F Childs Good Health 0/1 Response Levels: 2 Number of Observations: 528 Weight Variable: WGT694 Sum of Weights: 518.33874669 Link Function: Logit Response Profile Ordered Total Value CTHLTFD2 Count Weight 1 1:Yes 390 383.41621 2 0:No 138 134.92254 WARNING: 2 observation(s) were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables. Model Fitting Information and Testing Global Null Hypothesis BETA=0 Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates Chi-Square for Covariates AIC 596.398 575.552 . SC 600.667 622.512 . -2 LOG L 594.398 553.552 40.846 with 10 DF (p=0.0001) Score . . 41.575 with 10 DF (p=0.0001) Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Wald Pr > Standardized Odds Variable Variable DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Chi-Square Estimate Ratio Label INTERCPT 1 3.4011 0.8207 17.1742 0.0001 . . Intercept BLACK 1 0.1931 0.3126 0.3818 0.5367 0.041546 1.213 BLACK HISPANIC 1 -0.7806 0.2316 11.3564 0.0008 -0.201186 0.458 HISPANIC AGEP 1 -0.0617 0.0198 9.7557 0.0018 -0.191493 0.940 Age at Random Assignment-ph2 GYRADC 1 0.000431 0.000517 0.6939 0.4049 0.071417 1.000 AVG ADC PER MO RECVD YRKREC 1 -0.0388 0.0316 1.5058 0.2198 -0.107136 0.962 # OF MOS REC ADC PRIOR YEAR GENDER2Y 1 -0.0291 0.2102 0.0192 0.8899 -0.007954 0.971 Imputed Child Gender 2 year CHAGERAD 1 0.000302 0.0103 0.0009 0.9767 0.001741 1.000 B: Focal Child Age at RAD (mos) MARSTAT 1 0.1684 0.2313 0.5297 0.4667 0.045521 1.183 SINGL PAR EVER MARR OR MAR LIV W/SPS CTSUPRKB 1 -0.3024 0.3714 0.6633 0.4154 -0.044668 0.739 B: No source of support, 3 types J 1 -0.7162 0.2196 10.6347 0.0011 -0.179164 0.489 Labor Force Attachment logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98 10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 568 by cumulative number of composited risks B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks The LOGISTIC Procedure Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Concordant = 65.9% Somers' D = 0.323 Discordant = 33.6% Gamma = 0.325 Tied = 0.5% Tau-a = 0.125 (53820 pairs) c = 0.662 logistic COMPOSITED SUBGROUP Impacts, for RI LFAs, 6/28/98 10:15 Monday, June 29, 1998 569 by cumulative number of composited risks Analysis Variable : PROB223 Estimated Probability B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 110 0.8814308 0.1297743 0.3420258 0.9975566 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=0:2 Composte Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 54 0.7867103 0.1638633 0.3554996 0.9855947 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=0 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 376 0.7780612 0.0948572 0.3739055 0.9157208 ----------------------------------------------------------- B: If Two or more Composite Risks=1:2-4 Composite Risks Labor Force Attachment=1 N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum ----------------------------------------------------------- 153 0.6391607 0.1344044 0.2364115 0.8392684 -----------------------------------------------------------
The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.