Content by Keyword: Cost-Benefit Analysis

  • Home
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
Report page
Food and Drug Administration

Performance Improvement 1998. Food and Drug Administration

Contents Report of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992-Fiscal Year 1997 Report to Congress Economic Impact Analysis of Regulations Under the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 Mammography Quality Standards Act: Second Annual Government Entity Declaration Program Audit Product Review Per
Report page
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Performance Improvement 1998. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Contents Publications of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTS), May 1996 and Medical Treatment Effectiveness Projects 1989 through 1995 Final Report on Changes Needed in CONQUEST's Software Based Programs Final Report on Changes Needed in CONQUEST 1.0's Structure and Classification Scheme Assessment of the
Report page
Food and Drug Administration

Performance Improvement 1998. Food and Drug Administration

MISSION: To protect and promote public health through food, drug, medical device, and cosmetic regulation. Evaluation Program
Report page
Administration for Children and Families

Performance Improvement 1998. Administration for Children and Families

MISSION: To promote the economic and social well-being of families, children, individuals, and communities. Evaluation Program
Report
Performance Improvement 1998

Performance Improvement 1998

Performance Improvement 1998 is the third annual report of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on its evaluation activities. As a report to Congress, it summarizes the findings of HHS evaluations completed in fiscal year (FY) 1997. In that year, HHS agencies produced 155 evaluation reports and supported more than 335 evaluation
Report page
Food and Drug Administration

Performance Improvement 1997. Food and Drug Administration

MISSION: To protect and promote public health through food, drug, medical device, and cosmetic regulation. Evaluation Program Systemic changes in the government management environment are strongly influencing the setting, conduct, and utilization of evaluation activities in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Two forces related
Report
Performance Improvement 1997

Performance Improvement 1997

Performance Improvement 1997 is the second annual report of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on its evaluation activities. As a report to Congress, it summarizes the findings of HHS evaluations completed in fiscal year (FY) 1996. In that year, HHS agencies produced 87 evaluation reports and supported more than 250 evaluation
Report page
Food and Drug Administration

Performance Improvement 1996. Food and Drug Administration

MISSION: To protect and promote public health through food, drug, medical device, and cosmetic regulation. FDA Evaluation Program Systematic changes in the government management environment are strongly influencing the setting, conduct, and use of evaluation activities in FDA. Three forces--all related to the goals of the Government
Report page
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

Performance Improvement 1995. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

MISSION: To provide public health advice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and executive direction to the PHS Agencies through coordination and oversight of their programs.
Report
Performance Improvement 1995

Performance Improvement 1995

Performance Improvement 1995: Evaluation Activities of the Public Health Service is the first annual report on evaluation activities of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS). As a report to Congress, it summarizes the findings of PHS evaluations completed in fiscal year (FY) 1994. In general, the report is intended for three audiences: decisionmake
  • PerformanceImprovement1995.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
Defining and Measuring State Medicaid Spending

Defining and Measuring State Medicaid Spending Efficiency: A Literature Review

Contract No.: 100-03-0017 (HHSP2332008000002T) MPR Reference No.: 6547-400. Debra Lipson Margaret Colby Tim Lake Su Liu Sarah Turchin Submitted to: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services Asst. Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Hubert H. Humphrey Bldg. 200 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20201
  • report.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Basic report
Valuing Utility Offsets to Regulations Affecting

Valuing Utility Offsets to Regulations Affecting Addictive or Habitual Goods

Acknowledgements This paper was prepared for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by David Cutler (Harvard University), Amber Jessup (ASPE/HHS), Donald Kenkel (Cornell University), and Martha Starr (U.S. Food and Drug Administration and American University
  • addictivegood.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Report
Performance Improvement 2009 and program

Performance Improvement 2009

This report fulfills a statutory obligation of the Department of Health and Human Services. Section 241 of the Public Health Service Act directs the Secretary to inform Congress annually concerning findings from evaluations conducted by the Department. As required, the report is submitted to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committ
  • PerformanceImprovement2009.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Report
Performance Improvement 2008

Performance Improvement 2008

This Performance Improvement series of reports takes its name from the primary goal of carrying out evaluations – to improve the performance of programs meant to serve the greatest needs of the community. Performance Improvement 2008, the latest of these reports, makes available the most recently completed evaluations of the Department of Health
  • PerformanceImprovement2008.pdf
    export-csvPDF
Report
Performance Improvement 1996

Performance Improvement 1996

Performance Improvement 1996 is the first in a series of annual reports on evaluation activities of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As a report to Congress, it summarizes the findings of HHS evaluations completed in fiscal 1995. In that year, HHS agencies produced 148 evaluation reports and supported more than 200 evaluati

Pages