| [Section F] | [Table of Contents] |
| State or Territory | Formula Grants |
|
Competitive Grants |
|
Total Granteesa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Respondents | Response Rate (%) | Sample | Respondents | Response Rate (%) | Sample | Respondents | Response Rate (%) | |||
| Alabama | 3 | 3 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 4 | 4 | 100 | ||
| Alaska | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Arizona | 16 | 12 | 75 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 16 | 12 | 75 | ||
| Arkansas | 10 | 7 | 70 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 10 | 7 | 70 | ||
| California | 52 | 43 | 83 | 12b | 6 | 50 | 59 | 47 | 80 | ||
| Colorado | 9 | 4 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 10 | 5 | 50 | ||
| Connecticut | 8 | 6 | 75 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 8 | 6 | 75 | ||
| Delaware | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
| District of Columbia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3b | 3 | 100 | 4 | 3 | 75 | ||
| Florida | 26 | 15 | 58 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 27 | 16 | 59 | ||
| Georgia | 16 | 13 | 81 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 17 | 14 | 82 | ||
| Hawaii | 3 | 2 | 67 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3 | 2 | 67 | ||
| Illinois | 26 | 19 | 73 | 3 | 1 | 33 | 28 | 19 | 68 | ||
| Indiana | 16 | 9 | 56 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 16 | 9 | 56 | ||
| Iowa | 16 | 10 | 63 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 16 | 10 | 63 | ||
| Kansas | 5 | 5 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 5 | 5 | 100 | ||
| Kentucky | 11 | 5 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 11 | 5 | 45 | ||
| Louisiana | 18 | 13 | 72 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 18 | 13 | 72 | ||
| Maine | 3 | 2 | 67 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3 | 2 | 67 | ||
| Maryland | 12 | 9 | 75 | 2b | 1 | 50 | 14 | 10 | 71 | ||
| Massachusetts | 15 | 9 | 60 | 2b | 1 | 50 | 17 | 10 | 59 | ||
| Michigan | 26 | 19 | 73 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 27 | 20 | 74 | ||
| Minnesota | 17 | 15 | 88 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 17 | 15 | 88 | ||
| Missouri | 14 | 9 | 64 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 14 | 9 | 64 | ||
| Montana | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
| Nebraska | 3 | 2 | 67 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3 | 2 | 67 | ||
| Nevada | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 2 | 2 | 100 | ||
| New Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
| New Jersey | 15 | 7 | 47 | 2 | 1 | 50 | 15 | 7 | 47 | ||
| New Mexico | 3 | 3 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 4 | 4 | 100 | ||
| New York | 34 | 27 | 79 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 36 | 29 | 81 | ||
| North Carolina | 25 | 19 | 76 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 26 | 20 | 77 | ||
| North Dakota | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
| Ohio | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
| Oklahoma | 13 | 10 | 77 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 13 | 10 | 77 | ||
| Oregon | 6 | 3 | 50 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 6 | 3 | 50 | ||
| Pennsylvania | 28 | 17 | 61 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 29 | 18 | 62 | ||
| Rhode Island | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3 | 3 | 100 | ||
| South Carolina | 12 | 10 | 83 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 12 | 10 | 83 | ||
| Tennessee | 14 | 11 | 79 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 14 | 11 | 79 | ||
| Texas | 29 | 20 | 69 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 30 | 21 | 70 | ||
| Vermont | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 100 | ||
| Virginia | 14 | 10 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 16 | 12 | 75 | ||
| Washington | 12 | 9 | 75 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 12 | 9 | 75 | ||
| West Virginia | 3 | 2 | 67 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3 | 2 | 67 | ||
| Wisconsin | 11 | 9 | 82 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 11 | 9 | 82 | ||
| Puerto Rico | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Virgin Islands | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Guam | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| TOTAL | 567 | 398 | 70.2 | 51 | 40 | 78.4 | 598 | 422 | 70.4 | ||
|
Source: National Evaluation of the WelfaretoWork
Grants Program, First Grantee Survey (November 1998February 1999).
Note: n.a. = not applicable a The difference between the total number of WtW grants shown by state and the sum of the numbers of competitive and formula WtW grants by state represents the number of organizations receiving both formula and competitive WtW funds in each state. b The competitive grant numbers for these states include multisite WtW programs: 1 based in California, 2 in the District of Columbia, 2 in Maryland, and 1 in Massachusetts. |
|||||||||||
| [Section F] | [Table of Contents] |