Table 8.2
Program Impacts on Transitional Medicaid Benefits
Sample Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%)
A. All Respondents
Ever employed and off welfare
during follow-up (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 34.1 29.3 4.8 ** 16.2 VFADSTOP
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 30.4 29.3 1.1 3.8 VFADSTOP
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 47.6 36.2 11.4 *** 31.5 VFADSTOP
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 39.7 36.2 3.5 9.6 VFADSTOP
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 28.2 18.5 9.7 *** 52.5 VFADSTOP
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 21.7 13.5 8.2 *** 61.0 VFADSTOP
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 18.0 13.5 4.5 ** 33.4 VFADSTOP
Columbus Integrated 728 45.5 31.4 14.1 *** 44.9 VFADSTOP
Columbus Traditional 723 36.4 31.4 5.0 15.9 VFADSTOP
Detroit 426 23.4 21.2 2.2 10.2 VFADSTOP
Oklahoma City 511 39.1 38.3 0.8 2.1 VFADSTOP
Portland 610 47.7 37.3 10.4 ** 27.8 VFADSTOP
Ever covered by transitional medicaid
during follow-up (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 20.8 17.7 3.1 * 17.5 VFmedCOV
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 20.0 17.7 2.3 VFmedCOV
12.8
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 32.3 25.3 7.0 *** 27.7 VFmedCOV
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 26.8 25.3 1.5 6.1 VFmedCOV
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 18.5 10.4 8.1 *** 77.4 VFmedCOV
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 14.2 8.0 6.2 *** 78.2 VFmedCOV
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 12.6 8.0 4.7 ** 58.5 VFmedCOV
Columbus Integrated 728 29.9 15.4 14.5 *** 94.1 VFmedCOV
Columbus Traditional 723 23.2 15.4 7.7 ** 50.2 VFmedCOV
Detroit 426 14.3 10.1 4.2 41.5 VFmedCOV
Oklahoma City 511 19.7 23.4 -3.7 -15.7 VFmedCOV
Portland 610 37.2 24.3 12.9 *** 52.9 VFmedCOV
Home Pages:
NEWWS
Human Services Policy
(HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS)
Last modified on 09/10/01