The Role of Intermediaries in Linking TANF Recipients with Jobs

Appendix C:
Number of Intermediaries by Type of Organization (TANF and WtW)

[ Main Page of Report ]

Appendix C:
Number of Intermediaries by Type Of Organization
(Primary and Secondary)

		Type of Organization
Site	Total	Non-Profit	For-Profit	Educational	Public
Arizona Phoenix Yavapai County	2 0	0 0	1 0	0 0	1 0
Arkansas Little Rock Jefferson County	8 1	7 0	0 0	0 1	1 0
California San Diego Napa County	22 4	14 2	3 0	4 1	1 1
Connecticut Hartford New London County	11 3	10 0	1 2	0 1	0 0
Florida Jacksonville Suwannee County	2 1	1 0	1 0	0 1	0 0
Minnesota St. Paul Olmstead County	14 3	11 1	0 1	2 0	1 1
Nebraska Omaha Scottsbluff County	3 2	2 0	0 1	0 0	1 1
Ohio Cleveland Columbiana County	29 2	23 0	4 0	1 1	1 1
Texas San Antonio Uvalde County	10 1	7 1	2 0	1 0	0 0
Virginia Richmond Wise County	2 0	1 0	1 0	0 0	0 0
Grand Total	120	80	17	13	10
Percent of Total	100%	67%	14%	11%	8%
Urban	103	76	13	8	6
Percent of Total	100%	74%	13%	8%	6%
Rural	17	4	4	5	4
Percent of Total	100%	24%	24%	29%	24%

Where to?

Top of Page
Contents of This Section
Table of Contents of Report
Executive Summary
Introduction
Defining the Roles and Responsibilities of Intermediaries
Implementation of the “Intermediary” Function
Lessons Learned and Next Steps
Appendix A:  Site Descriptions
Appendix B:  Examples of Organizations Functioning as Intermediaries
Appendix C:  Number of Intermediaries by Type of Organization

Home Pages:
Human Services Policy (HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Last updated 06/02/00