National Study of Child Protective Services Systems and Reform Efforts: Findings on Local CPS Practices

Chapter 5.
Collaboration with Other Agencies

[ Main page of Report | Contents of Report ]

Contents

Endnote

This chapter examines the role of law enforcement and other agencies in CPS work. The analyses show the degree to which law enforcement and other agencies perform different CPS functions and how their involvement varies with type of maltreatment and type of perpetrator.

The analyses demonstrated that few CPS agencies had lead responsibility across all types of maltreatment for the investigation and alternative response functions. Other agencies, most notably law enforcement, have important roles in working with CPS agencies on the different functions. The specific circumstances of the maltreatment allegations and the type of perpetrator shaped the degree to which CPS agencies shared responsibility with other agencies. For the screening and investigation functions, it was fairly common for CPS agencies to share lead responsibility for the more serious types of maltreatment, especially with law enforcement agencies.

[Go To Contents]

5.1 Responsibility for CPS functions

The survey asked CPS agencies to indicate their role and degree of responsibility in connection with each of the primary CPS functions — screening, investigation, and alternative response. Specifically, for each of several forms of maltreatment, agencies were asked to indicate whether they were the lead agency with sole responsibility, were the lead agency sharing responsibility with another agency, supported another agency/agencies, or had no responsibility.

More CPS agencies had lead responsibility across all types of maltreatment for the screening function than for the investigation or alternative response functions (Table 5-1). While 50 percent of CPS agencies had lead responsibility for the screening function, just 17 percent of CPS agencies had lead responsibility for investigations across all types of maltreatment. Similarly, only 9 percent of CPS agencies had lead responsibility for the alternative response function across all types of maltreatment. For the investigation and alternative response functions, the majority of agencies had a range of responsibilities (e.g., lead some, support some, and share some) depending on the specific type of maltreatment.

Table 5-1:
Overall Level of Responsibility for Different CPS Functions
Responsibility Screening Investigation Alternative Response
Estimate
(C.I.) *
Percent Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent
Lead for all types of maltreatment 1,290
(1,120-1,470)
50% 450
(330-570)
17% 140
(80-200)
9%
Share for all types of maltreatment 350
(230-470)
13% 220
(140-300)
8% 60
(10-120)
4%
Support for all types of maltreatment 50
(10-100)
2% 20
(0-40)
1% 10
(0-20)
<1%
No responsibility 40
(0-80)
1% --- --- 610
(450-770)
37%
Other (lead some, support some, share some) 800
(630-960)
31% 1,910
(1,690-2,130)
73% 830
(690-970)
50%
Missing 70
(20-130)
3% 10
(0-30)
<1% 10
(0-20)
1%
Total 2,610
(2,410-2,810)
100% 2,610
(2,410-2,810)
100% 1,660
(1,460-1,860)
100%
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
*The 95 percent confidence interval (C.I.) indicates that, if the study were to be repeated with the same methodology 100 times, 95 of the replications would produce an estimate within the interval.

[Go To Contents]

5.2 Responsibility for Different Types of Maltreatment

The degree to which CPS agencies share responsibility with other agencies varies by maltreatment type, with more agencies sharing responsibility for the more serious types of maltreatment. Notable percentages of CPS agencies shared responsibility for screening and intake of sexual abuse (39%) and of physical abuse (29%), while somewhat fewer CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with other agencies for neglect (19%) and other types of maltreatment (19%), (Table 5-2).

For the investigation response, more CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with other agencies for the more serious maltreatment allegations (Table 5-3). More than one-half of the agencies shared lead responsibility for investigation of cases that involved severe physical abuse (65%), severe sexual abuse (66%), moderate sexual abuse (68%), or a child fatality (51%). At the same time, CPS agencies typically had sole lead responsibility for investigating forms of maltreatment that are regarded as more of the province of social work than law enforcement. More than

Table 5-2:
Responsibility for Screening and Intake by Maltreatment Type
Maltreatment type Lead Share Support None Missing Total
Physical abuse 63% 29% 2% 2% 4% 100%
Sexual abuse 50% 39% 6% 2% 3% 100%
Neglect 75% 19% 2% 2% 3% 100%
Other 73% 19% 2% 1% 4% 100%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 2,610 agencies.

one-half of agencies had lead responsibility when the case involved moderate physical abuse (50%), moderate neglect (78%), severe emotional maltreatment (70%), moderate emotional maltreatment (73%), lack of supervision (76%), abandonment (65%), or a drug exposed infant (64%). Also, CPS agencies typically had lead responsibility when the allegation involved risk of maltreatment.

Table 5-3:
Responsibility for Investigation by Maltreatment Type
Maltreatment type Lead Share Support None Missing Total
Severe physical abuse 23% 65% 11% --- 2% 100%
Moderate physical abuse 50% 47% 2% --- 1% 100%
At risk of physical abuse 76% 12% 2% 9% 1% 100%
Severe sexual abuse 19% 66% 13% --- 2% 100%
Moderate sexual abuse 21% 68% 10% --- 1% 100%
At risk of sexual abuse 60% 25% 4% 10% 1% 100%
Severe neglect 50% 46% 3% --- 1% 100%
Moderate neglect 78% 19% 1% 1% 1% 100%
At risk of neglect 73% 9% 3% 12% 2% 100%
Severe emotional maltreatment 70% 24% 2% 3% 1% 100%
Moderate maltreatment 73% 19% 2% 5% 1% 100%
At risk of emotional maltreatment 67% 11% 4% 16% 2% 100%
Truancy 6% 18% 27% 48% 2% 100%
Lack of supervision 76% 21% 1% 1% 1% 100%
Abandonment 65% 31% 1% 1% 1% 100%
Drug exposed infant 64% 31% 1% 3% 1% 100%
Status offense 9% 9% 17% 60% 5% 100%
Child fatality 12% 51% 31% 4% 2% 100%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 2,610 agencies.

The differences in CPS agency responsibility for the different types of maltreatment under the investigation and alternative responses were striking. Most agencies did not provide any alternative response for the more serious types of maltreatment (Table 5-4). More than one-half of CPS agencies did not provide alternative response for cases that involved severe physical abuse (57%), moderate physical abuse (52%), severe sexual abuse (55%), moderate sexual abuse (55%), severe neglect (55%), severe emotional maltreatment (52%), or status offenses (52%). Approximately one-quarter of agencies shared lead responsibility for the alternative response for severe physical abuse (22%), severe sexual abuse (26%), moderate sexual abuse (25%), or child fatality (23%).

Table 5-4:
Responsibility for Alternative Response by Maltreatment Type
Maltreatment type Lead Share Support None Missing Total
Severe physical abuse 13% 22% 5% 57% 3% 100%
Moderate physical abuse 25% 20% 1% 52% 2% 100%
At risk of physical abuse 56% 11% 6% 24% 3% 100%
Severe sexual abuse 9% 26% 8% 55% 2% 100%
Moderate sexual abuse 12% 25% 6% 55% 2% 100%
At risk of sexual abuse 40% 19% 6% 32% 3% 100%
Severe neglect 24% 15% 2% 55% 3% 100%
Moderate neglect 37% 13% 2% 45% 3% 100%
At risk of neglect 62% 10% 7% 20% 2% 100%
Severe emotional maltreatment 33% 12% 2% 52% 2% 100%
Moderate maltreatment 40% 12% 2% 45% 2% 100%
At risk of emotional maltreatment 57% 9% 7% 26% 1% 100%
Truancy 9% 13% 37% 40% 1% 100%
Lack of supervision 48% 12% 2% 36% 1% 100%
Abandonment 34% 14% 2% 49% 1% 100%
Drug exposed infant 36% 17% 2% 43% 2% 100%
Status offense 11% 5% 29% 52% 3% 100%
Child fatality 8% 23% 17% 50% 2% 100%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 1,660 agencies.

The preceding tables revealed that, across the different types of maltreatment, CPS agencies often shared lead responsibility with other agencies, particularly for the screening and investigation functions. Further analyses examined the specific agencies that were involved in CPS functions for different types of maltreatment. CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement more often than any other type of agency (Table 5-5). Nearly three-quarters of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement agencies for physical abuse (72%) and sexual abuse (70%).(1) Fewer CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement for neglect (58%) and emotional maltreatment (24%).

Since so few CPS agencies reported involvement by any single other type of agency, all nonlaw enforcement agencies were grouped together for these analyses. Nonlaw enforcement agencies include: juvenile justice agencies, mental health agencies, child advocacy centers or child protection teams, schools, centralized intake units, and licensing agencies. Just 17 percent of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with other, nonlaw enforcement agencies for physical abuse while 18 percent shared lead responsibility for sexual abuse. The percentages for the other types of maltreatment were similarly low, with 17 percent of CPS agencies sharing lead responsibility for neglect and 20 percent sharing for other types of maltreatment.

Table 5-5:
CPS Agency Involvement with Law Enforcement and Other Agencies for Different Types of Maltreatment
Law Enforcement Agencies Other, Nonlaw Enforcement Agencies
Agency Involvement Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent
Share lead responsibility for physical abuse 1,870
(1,650-2,090)
72% 430
(310-560)
17%
Share lead responsibility for sexual abuse 1,810
(1,580-2,040)
70% 470
(350-590)
18%
Share lead responsibility for neglect 1,510
(1,310-1,710)
58% 440
(310-570)
17%
Share lead responsibility for emotional maltreatment 630
(450-810)
24% 530
(390-670)
20%
Note: Cells in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 2,610 agencies.

[Go To Contents]

5.3 Responsibility for Different Types of Perpetrators

The survey also asked a series of questions to determine the degree of shared responsibility for cases involving different types of perpetrators. Overall, similar percentages of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility for investigations across the different types of perpetrators (Table 5-6). Approximately one-third of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility for conducting investigations when the perpetrator was a family member or relative (39%), a foster parent (37%), a staff member at a group home or institution (36%), or a minor (35%).

While fewer CPS agencies shared lead responsibility for the alternative response function, again the percentages were similar across the different types of perpetrators (Table 5-7). Around one-fifth of agencies with an alternative response shared lead responsibility with other agencies when the perpetrator was a family member or relative (20%), a foster parent (16%), a staff member at a group home or institution (20%), or a minor (21%). Under alternative response, many agencies did not have responsibility for cases when the perpetrator was a foster parent (43%), a group home or facility staff person (48%), or a minor (36%).

Table 5-6:
Responsibility for Investigation by Perpetrator Type
Perpetrator Lead Share Support None Missing Total
Family member or relative 56% 39% 2% <1% 3% 100%
Foster parent 37% 37% 20% 3% 3% 100%
Group home or institution staff 23% 36% 23% 14% 4% 100%
Minor 41% 35% 12% 6% 5% 100%
Not a caregiver 7% 12% 34% 45% 2% 100%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 2,610 agencies.

Table 5-7:
Responsibility for Alternative Response by Perpetrator Type
Perpetrator Lead Share Support None Missing Total
Family member or relative 41% 20% 3% 31% 5% 100%
Foster parent 23% 16% 14% 43% 4% 100%
Group home or institution staff 11% 20% 19% 48% 2% 100%
Minor 28% 21% 11% 36% 4% 100%
Not a caregiver 11% 5% 30% 51% 3% 100%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Numbers in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.
Note: Percentages are based on weighted total of 1,660 agencies.

The preceding tables also revealed that CPS agencies were very commonly involved with other agencies in some capacity across the different types of perpetrators. Further analyses found that for most types of perpetrators these agencies shared lead responsibility more often with law enforcement than with any other type of agency. A substantial minority of CPS agencies (41%) shared lead responsibility with law enforcement when the perpetrator was a family member or relative (Table 5-8). Thirty percent shared responsibility with law enforcement when the perpetrator was a minor. Nearly one-quarter (24%) of CPS agencies reported sharing lead responsibility with law enforcement when the perpetrator was the child's foster parent, while 17 percent shared when the alleged perpetrator was a staff person from a group home or institution. Only 13 percent of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement for noncaregiver perpetrators.

Table 5-8:
CPS Agency Involvement with Law Enforcement and Other Agencies for Different Types of Perpetrators
Law Enforcement Agencies Other, Nonlaw Enforcement Agencies
Agency Involvement Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent Estimate
(C.I.)
Percent
Share for family member or relative 1,070
(910-1,230)
41% 80
(30-130)
3%
Share for minor 770
(630-910)
30% 210
(130-290)
8%
Share for foster parent 610
(490-740)
24% 430
(320-530)
16%
Share for group home or institution staff 440
(330-540)
17% 580
(450-710)
22%
Share for noncaregivers 350
(240-450)
13% 30
(0-60)
1%
Note: Percentages are not additive because agencies were included in each applicable row (category).
Note: Cells in italics are based on 10 or fewer agencies.

Other, nonlaw enforcement agencies were also involved with CPS agencies for different types of perpetrators (Table 5-8). However, with one exception, sharing with other nonlaw enforcement agencies was relatively rare. Very few nonlaw enforcement agencies were involved in responding to maltreatment perpetrated by a family member or relative (3%), minor (8%), foster parent (16%), or noncaregiver (1%). CPS agencies were somewhat more likely to share lead responsibility with other nonlaw enforcement agencies for maltreatment perpetrated by a staff member at a group home or institution.

[Go To Contents]

5.4 Conclusion

While more CPS agencies claimed lead responsibility across all type of maltreatment for the screening function, very few had overall lead responsibility for the investigation and alternative response functions. The specific circumstances of the maltreatment also shaped the role of CPS agencies. CPS agencies shared lead responsibility more often for the more serious forms of maltreatment. CPS agencies shared lead responsibility for screening more often for physical abuse (29%) and sexual abuse (39%) than for neglect (19%) or other maltreatment. Similarly, while 65 percent of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility for severe physical abuse, the percentages for moderate physical abuse (47%) and at risk of physical abuse (12%) were much lower. CPS agencies were most likely to have lead responsibility when an investigation or an alternative response related to a perpetrator who was a family member or a relative. Approximately one-half of the agencies did not provide alternative response in cases that included foster parents, group home or institutional staff, or minors.

The findings also reveal a distinction between the role of law enforcement and that of other agencies in CPS work. Across different types of maltreatment, CPS agencies reported sharing lead responsibility with law enforcement more often than with any other type of agency. While nearly three-quarters of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement for physical and sexual abuse, fewer than 20 percent of agencies shared with other, nonlaw enforcement agencies for these types of maltreatment. The same pattern holds true for different types of perpetrators with more sharing of lead responsibility with law enforcement agencies. While 41 percent of CPS agencies shared lead responsibility with law enforcement agencies when the perpetrator was a family member or relative, just 3 percent shared with other agencies for this type of perpetrator. Together, these differences emphasize the significant role law enforcement agencies play in CPS processes. Law enforcement agencies are the only other agencies besides CPS agencies that can receive mandated reports of child maltreatment, enforce the applicable criminal law, and remove children from their parents, if they are being maltreated or are at risk of maltreatment.

Endnote

1.  If a CPS agency said that they shared lead responsibility with law enforcement for physical abuse for any of the three functions (screening, investigation, alternative response), then that agency was counted as sharing lead responsibility with law enforcement for physical abuse.


Where to?

Top of Page | Contents
Main Page of Report | Contents of Report

Home Pages:
Human Services Policy (HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)