Table 7.3
Program Impacts on Employment Status of Respondent and
Other Household Members in the Last Month of Follow-Up
Sample Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%)
Only respondent employed (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 31.8 27.8 4.1 ** 14.7 EORYOHHN
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 28.2 27.8 0.4 1.5 EORYOHHN
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 37.7 32.8 4.9 * 15.0 EORYOHHN
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 33.9 32.8 1.1 3.2 EORYOHHN
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 28.4 22.4 5.9 *** 26.5 EORYOHHN
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 25.7 18.4 7.4 *** 40.2 EORYOHHN
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 25.7 18.4 7.4 *** 40.1 EORYOHHN
Columbus Integrated 728 37.6 27.4 10.2 *** 37.1 EORYOHHN
Columbus Traditional 723 31.5 27.4 4.1 14.9 EORYOHHN
Detroit 426 33.8 28.3 5.5 19.4 EORYOHHN
Oklahoma City 511 30.2 28.9 1.3 4.5 EORYOHHN
Portland 610 32.5 21.6 10.9 *** 50.5 EORYOHHN
Only other household members employed (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 8.5 11.7 -3.2 ** -27.2 EORNOHHY
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 9.6 11.7 -2.1 -17.6 EORNOHHY
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 13.7 12.6 1.1 8.8 EORNOHHY
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 11.8 12.6 -0.8 -6.2 EORNOHHY
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 17.6 18.6 -1.1 -5.7 EORNOHHY
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 19.6 19.8 -0.2 -1.1 EORNOHHY
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 19.6 19.8 -0.2 -1.0 EORNOHHY
Columbus Integrated 728 10.8 14.4 -3.6 -25.0 EORNOHHY
Columbus Traditional 723 12.2 14.4 -2.2 -15.0 EORNOHHY
Detroit 426 4.5 8.6 -4.0 -47.1 EORNOHHY
Oklahoma City 511 15.2 21.2 -6.0 * -28.3 EORNOHHY
Portland 610 19.3 23.6 -4.4 -18.5 EORNOHHY
(continued)
Table 7.3 (continued)
Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program Group Group (Impact) Change (%)
Respondent and other household
members employed (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 7.6 8.6 -0.9 -11.0 EORYOHHY
Atlanta Human Capital Development 8.9 8.6 0.4 4.3 EORYOHHY
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 18.8 18.6 0.2 1.1 EORYOHHY
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 19.2 18.6 0.6 3.5 EORYOHHY
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 14.2 13.0 1.2 9.2 EORYOHHY
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 11.8 10.1 1.7 16.7 EORYOHHY
Riverside Human Capital Development 11.2 10.1 1.1 10.6 EORYOHHY
Columbus Integrated 14.3 13.2 1.1 8.5 EORYOHHY
Columbus Traditional 14.5 13.2 1.3 10.2 EORYOHHY
Detroit 9.7 5.8 3.9 67.8 EORYOHHY
Oklahoma City 18.6 19.4 -0.9 -4.4 EORYOHHY
Portland 17.6 13.1 4.5 33.9 EORYOHHY
Respondent and other household
members not employed (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 52.0 52.0 0.0 0.1 eornohhn
Atlanta Human Capital Development 53.2 52.0 1.3 2.4 eornohhn
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 29.8 36.0 -6.2 ** -17.3 eornohhn
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 35.1 36.0 -0.9 -2.6 eornohhn
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 39.9 46.0 -6.1 *** -13.2 eornohhn
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 42.9 51.7 -8.9 *** -17.1 eornohhn
Riverside Human Capital Development 43.5 51.7 -8.2 *** -15.9 eornohhn
Columbus Integrated 37.3 45.0 -7.7 ** -17.1 eornohhn
Columbus Traditional 41.8 45.0 -3.3 -7.3 eornohhn
Detroit 52.0 57.4 -5.4 -9.4 eornohhn
Oklahoma City 36.0 30.5 5.6 18.3 eornohhn
Portland 30.7 41.6 -11.0 *** -26.4 eornohhn
Home Pages:
NEWWS
Human Services Policy
(HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS)
Last modified on 09/10/01