Table 9.6
Program Impacts on Subsidized Child Care Use While Employed During Follow-Up Period
for All Sample Members and for Those Who Used Paid Care
Sample Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%)
A. For All Sample Members
Used subsidized child care for most recent job (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 8.8 2.6 6.2 *** 237.9 nopktcc
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 5.5 2.6 2.9 *** 111.7 nopktcc
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 2.1 0.6 1.4 * 231.0 nopktcc
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 2.6 0.6 1.9 ** 311.3 nopktcc
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 3.8 1.5 2.4 *** 158.3 nopktcc
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 3.3 0.7 2.7 *** 407.7 nopktcc
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 1.4 0.7 0.8 119.9 nopktcc
Columbus Integrated 728 1.9 3.8 -1.9 -50.3 nopktcc
Columbus Traditional 723 3.7 3.8 -0.1 -3.3 nopktcc
Detroit 426 3.1 0.7 2.4 * 360.5 nopktcc
Oklahoma City 511 5.5 5.0 0.5 9.2 nopktcc
Portland 610 9.1 3.7 5.4 ** 147.3 nopktcc
Home Pages:
NEWWS
Human Services Policy
(HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS)
Last modified on 09/10/01