Table 9.1
Program Impacts on Child Care Use
While Employed During the Two-Year Follow-Up Period
Sample Program Control Difference Percentage
Site and Program Size Group Group (Impact) Change (%)
Ever used child care during most recent
or current job (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 33.2 29.0 4.2 ** 14.4 vhanycc
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 31.8 29.0 2.9 9.9 vhanycc
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 50.0 43.3 6.7 ** 15.5 vhanycc
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 42.5 43.3 -0.8 -1.9 vhanycc
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 42.5 29.4 13.1 *** 44.6 vhanycc
Lacked high school diploma or basic 1012 39.5 23.3 16.1 *** 69.2 vhanycc
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 30.1 23.3 6.7 ** 28.7 vhanycc
Columbus Integrated 728 38.3 36.0 2.3 6.4 vhanycc
Columbus Traditional 723 36.1 36.0 0.0 0.1 vhanycc
Detroit 426 40.6 33.2 7.5 * 22.5 vhanycc
Oklahoma City 511 53.3 43.6 9.6 ** 22.1 vhanycc
Portland 610 48.9 39.0 9.9 ** 25.3 vhanycc
Ever used paid child care during most recent
or current job (%)
Atlanta Labor Force Attachment 1890 25.5 19.7 5.8 *** 29.4 paidcc
Atlanta Human Capital Development 2199 23.9 19.7 4.2 ** 21.2 paidcc
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment 1158 39.6 32.3 7.4 *** 22.8 paidcc
Grand Rapids Human Capital Development 1158 32.0 32.3 -0.3 -0.8 paidcc
Riverside Labor Force Attachment 1678 28.8 20.9 7.9 *** 37.6 paidcc
Lacked high school diploma or basic skills 1012 26.1 15.2 10.9 *** 72.1 paidcc
Riverside Human Capital Development 1350 21.7 15.2 6.6 *** 43.3 paidcc
Columbus Integrated 728 28.1 22.7 5.5 * 24.2 paidcc
Columbus Traditional 723 25.1 22.7 2.4 10.6 paidcc
Detroit 426 35.9 22.9 13.0 *** 56.5 paidcc
Oklahoma City 511 36.1 29.5 6.6 * 22.4 paidcc
Portland 610 41.3 29.4 11.9 *** 40.6 paidcc
Home Pages:
NEWWS
Human Services Policy
(HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS)
Last modified on 09/10/01