ES 2.1
EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT CASH AND NEAR-CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS ON POVERTY AMONG PERSONS LIVING IN FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN UNDER AGE 18
Although the federal system of cash and near-cash transfers (including federal income and payroll taxes)10 plays a substantial role in reducing the poverty rate of children, its collective effect has varied significantly over time. In 1979, federal cash and near-cash transfers produced a 37 percent reduction in poverty among persons in families with related children under age 18 (see Figure ES 2.1). However, by 1983, the same transfer programs produced only a 19.1 percent reduction in poverty. By 1989 the percentage poverty reduction recovered to 23.9 percent, rose again to 26.5 percent in 1993, and to 32.6 percent in 1994.
In the absence of any federal transfers and taxes, 21.4 percent of all persons living in families with children would have been poor in 1994 (see Table ES 2.1). Social insurance programs other than Social Security reduced the poverty rate to 20.6 percent. The Social Security system reduced the poverty rate further to 19.2 percent. After inclusion of means-tested cash transfers, the poverty rate fell to 17.8 percent. Food and housing benefits cut the poverty rate to 15.3 percent. Finally, the federal tax system reduced the poverty rate of all persons living in families with children to 14.4 percent.
All of the federal cash and near cash transfers considered in Table ES 2.1
except federal taxes reduced poverty among persons in families with related
children under age 18 in all years. Until recently, the net impact of the
federal tax system was to increase the poverty rate. By 1993, however,
the impact of the tax system on the number of such persons in poverty became
neutral, and in 1994, the federal tax system reduced the number of
persons in poverty. This is because of the recent expansion of the Earned
Income Tax Credit (EITC), which provides refundable tax credits to low-income
families with children and at least one working parent whose earnings are
low. Because the credit is refundable, many families eligible for the EITC
receive a payment from the Treasury instead of paying federal income tax.
Figure ES 2.1
|
| Source: Congressional Budget Office computations using the CBO tax model, with data from the March Current Population Survey, 1980, 1984, 1990, 1994, and 1995. Table prepared by staff from the Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. |
Table ES 2.1
|
||||||
| Total population (in thousands) |
144,551
|
|||||
| Poverty rate (in percent): | ||||||
| Cash income before transfers | ||||||
| Plus social Insurance (other than Social Security) | ||||||
| Plus Social Security | ||||||
| Plus means-tested cash transfers | ||||||
| Plus food and housing benefits | ||||||
| Less Federal taxes | ||||||
| Total percentage reduction in poverty rate | ||||||
| Source: Congressional Budget Office computations using the CBO tax model, with data from the March Current Population Survey, 1980, 1984, 1990, 1994, and 1995. Table prepared by staff from the Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. | ||||||