Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy (DALTCP) RESEARCH PROJECTS
This section describes ongoing DALTCP-funded research, as well as research completed within the past five
years. Reports produced through these projects are listed, including links to
the Abstract, Executive Summary and/or Full Report (if available online).
Remember, the Site Index section
includes an alphabetic list of keywords you can choose to find information
that is referenced throughout the DALTCP website.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct data
analyses using the 1999 National Long-Term Care Survey Informal Caregivers
Supplement (NLTCS/ICS). The data analyses will be used to revise and update the
1998 ASPE/AoA publication "Informal Caregiving:
Compassion in Action." A technical advisory group will be created to help
guide the work and will consist of noted researchers on caregiving who are
familiar with the NLTCS/ICS (e.g., Richard Schultz of the University of
Pittsburgh) and representatives of organizations whose members may be among the
target audience for the revised report (e.g., National Association of State
Units on Aging, AARP, National Family Caregivers Alliance).
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Beth Jackson, The MEDSTAT
Group, Cambridge, MA |
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct
analyses using the 1984-1999 National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) and the
Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to understand the nature of recent
declines in elderly disability rates and their implications for health care
utilization and costs. Specifically, researchers at The Urban Institute are (1)
decomposing changes in elderly disability rates using the 1984 to 1999 NLTCS
and exploring possible reasons for the decline, and (2) linking changes in
elderly disability rates to the use of specific medical procedures (e.g.,
cataract surgery, coronary and joint replacement surgeries) and/or assistive
technology. The MCBS is the primary data set for the latter analyses.
Understanding the structure of the decline will give us our first clues
as to the reasons for the overall decline, the likelihood that disability rates
will continue to fall in the future, and its potential impact on health care
spending. Current hypotheses for the decline include improvements in nutrition
(including advances in food preparation and storage over the century),
healthier life-styles (higher levels of physical activity, lower levels of
drinking and smoking), better treatment of chronic diseases through medical
procedures and pharmaceuticals, and use of assistive devices and technology. It
is likely that future improvements in disability and changes in health care
utilization and spending will be heavily dependent on which of these hypotheses
is correct. For example, if declines in disability rates are due primarily to
improvements in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) or equipment
use and reflect environmental changes rather than improvements in the intrinsic
health of the elderly population, then the declines observed over the last
decade may not continue into the next century and may have limited impact on
acute health care spending. This project is a first step in understanding the
policy implications of the changes that we are observing in elderly disability
rates.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brenda Spillman, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2002 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Changes in Elderly Disability Rates and the Implications for Health Care Utilization and Cost AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version from contractor |
PURPOSE: There are four main questions to be addressed
in this project: (1) How do characteristics (both individual and environmental)
of elderly persons residing in institutional settings differ from those
residing in community-based settings? (2) How do these characteristics
vary over time? (3) Are there differences in these characteristics between
subgroups of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly? (4)
What is the relationship between selected individual and environmental
factors and the transition of the elderly between community and institutional
residential settings? Data from six years of the Medicare Current Beneficiary
Survey will be used to answer these questions. Understanding residential
transitions will help staff in the Department improve surveys that monitor
acute health and long-term care use in different settings (e.g., the Medical
Expenditure Panel Survey) and address outstanding long-term care policy
issues (e.g., allocation of resources between community and institutional
settings).
| CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
| PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Korbin Liu, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
| COMPLETION DATE |
March 2002 |
| REPORT
AVAILABLE |
Trends in Residential Long Term Care: Use of Nursing Homes and Assisted Living and Characteristics of Facilities and Residents
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Full Report awaiting final review |
PURPOSE: This research had two components. First, a
survey of employers offering their employees long-term care insurance benefits
was conducted. This survey identified the existing group market and how it
functions. Because most of the long-term care insurance market is composed of
individual products--and because much of the employer information on long-term
care insurance is fairly recent and not well explored--not much is known about
the benefit packages, price, or design of these group products. The goal here
was to identify quantitatively the "best practices" in the industry. The second part of this
contract concerned the design of possible long-term care insurance benefits for
federal employees (and presumably their spouses, parents and retirees as well).
To do this, the contractor reviewed the market survey to identify important
elements of the existing employer group. They used this information, as well as
appropriate actuarial methods, to develop several long-term care insurance
coverage options for federal employees. Throughout the life of the
contract, the contractor conducted a series of informational meetings and
seminars. These seminars helped inform the primary federal policy makers (such
as the Office of Personnel Management) as to progress on this research and the
accompanying design options.
The final reports include a preliminary and then a final stand-alone report on the employer market. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The survey data indicate that,
among employers offering the product, the employer market provides greater
access to coverage than in the individual market. A majority of employers
offered less restrictive underwriting or even guarantee issue policies (i.e.,
did not require health information) during initial offerings to active
full-time employees. In addition, a majority offered coverage to at least one
group in addition to full-time active employees (i.e., parents/in-laws,
spouses, and retired employees), potentially extending the benefit well beyond
the size of the employee population.
Most of the employers surveyed usually limited the number of benefit choices. For example, a majority offered
two to four benefit amount options and a set package rather than allowing the
employee to select every option separately. Nearly all employers used a single
LTC insurer. These practices simplify the multiplicity of choices generally
related to purchasing this product.
Despite the limited choices of benefits, data from a random sample of employers suggest that the benefit
features of employer group plans generally resemble the most common
individually purchased policies. All surveyed employers offered some type of
inflation protection, Just under half of the surveyed employers offered some
type of "non-forfeiture" benefit that would provide the purchaser some level of
benefits if he or she lapses. The vast majority of plans (all but two) required
the employee to pay the entire premium.
Employee purchase rates varied considerably by employer. While over 40 percent of employers experienced
participation rates below 2 percent, 20 percent achieved participation of 10
percent or higher.
The survey also revealed that companies considered educating employees about the
benefit very important, but also challenging. When asked what they would have
improved about the insurance offering, employers (particularly those with low
participation rates) most cited education and communication during the initial
offering. Insurers corroborated this, and added that employers appeared to have
better enrollment rates when senior management was actively involved.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Lisa Alecxih, Lewin Group,
Fairfax, VA Steve Lutzky, Lewin Group,
Fairfax, VA
John Wilkin, Actuarial Research Corporation |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
June 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Preliminary Data from a Survey of Employers Offering Group Long-Term Care Insurance to Their Employees
AUTHORS: Steven Lutzky, John Corea, Lisa Alecxih, Laura Marburger and Kathlyn Wee
DATE: June 23, 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Research and Other Developments of Interest in Employer Group Long-Term Care Insurance
AUTHOR: John Cutler
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Survey of Employers Offering Group Long-Term Care Insurance to Their Employees
AUTHORS: Steven Lutzky, John Corea and Lisa Alecxih
DATE: June 20, 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The Disability Supplement to the National
Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D) was the first comprehensive survey of
disability in the United States. The survey was unique in that it focused on
several populations of persons with disabilities who are generally omitted or
under-represented in national survey efforts: children, persons with mental
retardation and other developmental disabilities, and the working-age
population. ASPE was instrumental in the design and implementation of the
survey, and this project develops a research agenda for analyzing the data. The
goal is to produce both short-term products and final reports that will inform
ongoing ASPE, Departmental, and Administration research and policy initiatives.
Several reports will be produced that address a specific set of questions in
four topical areas using the NHIS-D: welfare receipt and disability (including
chronic illness), disability and chronic illness among low income populations,
childhood disability and chronic illness, and employment and
disability.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Pamela Loprest, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Barriers to and Supports for Work Among Adults with Disabilities: Results from the NHIS-D
AUTHORS: Pamela Loprest and Elaine Maag
DATE: October 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Supportive Health Service Needs of Children with Disabilities
AUTHOR: Elaine Maag
DATE: September 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Most experts agree that long-term care
insurance products must include both nursing home and home care benefits if
they are to be commercially acceptable. Yet private insurers as well as public
payers are concerned about their ability to control home care claims,
particularly given the potential substitution of formal home care services for
care provided by families. The purpose of this study (co-funded by the Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation) was to collect detailed information on the experience
of long-term care policy holders who have filed insurance claims to receive
home care benefits and how their formal and informal service use compares to a
comparable population of elderly persons without private insurance. Primary
data collection involved face-to-face interviews with approximately 1,700
persons (1,200 disabled insurance claimants and 500 next-of-kin of those
claimants) to collect information on functional and medical characteristics of
claimants as well as formal and informal services use. The sample of claimants
was drawn from the files of insurance companies that account for the majority
of private long-term care policies now in force. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Satisfaction with their insurance
benefits among claimants is generally very high, although it varied
systematically across the eight participating companies. Most home care
claimants and their informal caregivers felt that without the home care
benefits, the claimant would have had to enter a nursing home or other
residential care setting. Most nursing facility claimants did not believe that
availability of insurance had made a difference with respect to whether they
received care at home or in a nursing home; most had not previously used their
policies to pay for home care before entering a nursing facility. Private
long-term care insurance claimants received the same amounts of informal care
from spouses as non-insured elders with comparable disabilities (respondents in
the 1994 NLTCS), but private long-term care insurance claimants did receive
less "hands-on" assistance from adult children. Often, interviews with
claimants indicated that among the claimants' motives for purchasing private
long-term care insurance was to avoid becoming overly dependent on adult
children for assistance.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Marc Cohen, LifePlans, Inc., Boston, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Descriptive Analysis of Patterns of Informal and Formal Caregiving among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders Living in the Community
AUTHORS: LifePlans, Inc., and the Center for Health and Long-Term Care Research
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Informal Caregivers of Disabled Elders with Long-Term Care Insurance
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen, Maurice Weinrobe and Jessica Miller
DATE: January 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Informal and Formal Caregiving among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders Living in the Community
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen, Maurice Weinrobe and Jessica Miller
DATE: April 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Use of Nursing Home and Assisted Living Facilties Among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen and Jessica Miller
DATE: April 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This (co-sponsored by the Administration on
Aging and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) project provided funding to
develop comparative profiles of state long-term care systems so that states
could assess their progress in "balancing" public support for home and
community-based services as well as nursing home care for disabled elders. As a
companion project, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided separate funds
for States to access technical assistance or "mentoring" from other States with
more developed home and community-based/long-term care systems. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Profiles of state long-term care
systems were developed using a variety of indicators of supply and demand for
publicly-funded services as well as indicators of state spending on various
types of services per 1000 elders in the state's population and per eligible
public program beneficiary. Data used to develop the indicators were primarily
for 1996.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Robert Kane, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Rosalie Kane, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 1999 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
State LTC Profiles Report, 1996
AUTHORS: Richard C. Ladd, Robert L. Kane and Rosalie A. Kane
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: In an effort to encourage more states to
provide Medicaid to working individuals with disabilities, and to give states
addition options for providing Medicaid to those individuals, Congress
permitted states to expand their Medicaid programs (through a Medicaid
"buy-in") and allow people with disabilities to continue to receive Medicaid
services even if they return to work and have earnings greater than 100% of the
Federal Poverty Level. The goal of this project is to: (1) examine the early
implementation experiences of states that have opted for a Medicaid buy-in for
people with disabilities, and (2) offer technical assistance to states on
developing cost models, design features of a buy-in, as well as implementation
and administration considerations for a buy-in. The project represents a unique
opportunity to compare the design and implementation experiences of different
states, and use the information gathered to inform both state and federal
policy makers about strategies for improving systems that support the
employment of people with disabilities.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Allen Jenson, George Washington Unviersity, Washington, D.C.
Donna Folkemer, National Council on State Legislators
Bobby Silverstein, Center for the Study and Advancement of Disability Policy |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Medicaid Buy-In Programs: Case Studies of Early Implementer States
AUTHORS: Donna Folkemer, Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Medicaid Buy-In Program: Lessons Learned From Nine "Early Implementer" States
AUTHORS: Donna Folkemer, Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Policy Frameworks for Designing Medicaid Buy-In Programs and Related State Work Incentive Initiatives
AUTHORS: Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein, Donna Folkemer and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct
case studies of Nursing Home Transition Programs in up to eight states (with
possible additions depending on future grant awards). The programs being
evaluated were developed and implemented with funding from an ongoing grant
initiative sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). A case
study approach is proposed for two reasons: (1) the vast differences in state
Medicaid programs, state long-term care infrastructures, and proposed nursing
home transition programs; and, (2) the small number of nursing home residents
expected to participate in the transition programs. Each case study will attempt to
determine the most significant barriers faced by nursing home residents in
returning to the community, and, to glean the relative success or failure of
the strategies used by grantees to overcome these barriers. As CMS and ASPE
intend to continue making additional grants in this area, an evaluation of
grantee activity will assist federal policy makers in further grant making, and
state policy makers in developing transition programs.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy
(Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brian Burwell, The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
February 2002 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Homecoming Project: Wisconsin's Nursing Home Transition Demonstration
AUTHORS: Steve Eiken, David Stevenson and Brian Burwell
DATE: August 21, 2002 (draft)
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Michigan's Transitioning Persons from Nursing Homes to Community Living Program
AUTHORS: Steve Eiken, Brian Burwell and Anthony Asciutto
DATE: July 31, 2002 (draft)
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The major goals of this contract are: (1) to identify the technical assistance needs of states and other organizations interested in replicating and enhancing or developing the infrastructure needed to implement a "Cash and Counseling" model of consumer-directed long-term care services; (2) to set up a Research and Technical Assistance Center (RTAC) to be run out of Boston University that will begin to assist states interested in developing individual and family-directed home and community-bsed services using CMS's recently announced "Independence Plus" waiver templates; and (3) to develop and implement a plan for conducting research related to the development of infrastructure for consumer-directed programs.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: A number of national surveys (e.g., the
National Long-Term Care Survey, the Survey of Income and Program Participation,
the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, and the Health and Retirement
Survey/Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest-Old Survey) and other sources
have shown that recent improvements in life expectancy have been accompanied by
significant declines in the number of elderly persons with activity limitations
and/or cognitive impairments. Efforts among researchers and policy makers are
now shifting toward understanding the reasons for these declines and the
potential policy implications. Under this blanket purchase agreement, the
contractor shall provide expert advice on changes in the prevalence of
disability in the older American population and analysis of possible reasons
for these changes. Specifically, the contractor shall (1) review the current
literature on changes in elderly disability rates, (2) discuss the major
hypotheses proposed by researchers to explain declines in the prevalence of
elderly disability, and (3) review and critique the major studies and data used
to evaluate one or more of these hypotheses.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Larry Corder, Duke University, Durham, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2002 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Changes in the Prevalence of Disability in the Older American Population: Hypothesis and Evidence Final Report
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version from contractor |
PURPOSE: Caring for persons with disabilities in the
least restrictive setting is a major long-term care policy objective. It is
important to identify nursing home residents who could be discharged to the
community if appropriate home and community-based services were available. This
project will analyze data from a new source--the Minimum Data Set (MDS)--in
nine states. The MDS consists of assessments which have been conducted on all
nursing home residents in selected States as part of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demonstration (and
starting in the summer of 1998, the data will be collected in electronic form
in all 50 States). We will learn much more about the medical conditions,
functional needs, and specific services used by nursing home residents than was
possible with previous data sets. We will also be able to study important
subpopulations, especially the nonelderly. The policy implications of the
findings will be assessed.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) Susan Nonemaker,
CMS |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Brant Fries, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI John Morris, Hebrew
Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Characteristics of Nursing Home Residents Under Age 65
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final review |
PURPOSE: This project will examine the extent to which childless elderly--who are otherwise similar to older persons with children--cost more to the Medicare program, and will identify the specific groups of services (e.g., hospital inpatient, outpatient, home health, skilled nursing, physician, hospice, etc.) that are most susceptible to differential use by elderly Medicare beneficiaries with and without children. This will allow the Department to decide whether--and how--the growth in the size of older Americans with no children would need to be accounted for in planning for the Medicare program's financial future.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan
(Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Urban Institute |
PURPOSE: Home health care services are covered in full for Medicare beneficiaries who meet a set of coverage criteria. Though most coverage criteria are straightforward, there is no operational definition to either the homebound or the medical necessity criteria that can be used uniformly by providers and intermediaries. The vagueness of these two criteria led to wide interpretations by and subsequent problems for the Fiscal Intermediaries and providers as well. The purpose of this project is to develop and test a set of uniform and reliable indicators that can be systematically used to document and monitor two Medicare home health care coverage criteria: the "Homebound" and the "Medical Necessity" criteria. The indicators will be linked to items from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) in a decision tree algorithm (or a logic model). Two decision algorithms will be developed for the two criteria. The algorithms will represent a major step toward helping providers, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and the intermediaries in administering the home health benefit. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Findings from the study show that the two OASIS algorithms successfully identify patients highly likely to meet the homebound and medical necessity criteria for Medicare home health care. Using OASIS data alone, almost 90% of the 600 patients in the sample were classified as meeting the medical necessity criterion. The figure for the homebound criterion is lower (48.5%). It is critical to note, however, that individuals may be clearly eligible for home care benefits even though they are not captured by the OASIS algorithms. Nurses who were experts in chart review, in fact, concluded that over half of the patients who were not captured by the homebound algorithm did meet the requirement based on a careful review of patients' medical records.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Christopher Murtaugh, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY Sarah Donelson,
PeaceHealth, Eugene, OR |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2001 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Clarifying the Definition of Homebound and Medical Necessity Using OASIS Data: Final Report
AUTHORS: Sarah M. Donelson, Christopher M. Murtaugh, Penny Hollander Feldman, Lori Bruno, Stephanna Zeppie, Shiela Kinatukara Neder, Eva Quint, Liping Huang and Amy Clark
DATE: March 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to
encourage international comparative data collection. This was a follow-up to
the G8 Summit Aging Experts Meeting in May 1997. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A two-day international experts
meeting was convened by OECD in December 1999.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Peter Hicks, Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 1999 |
PURPOSE: Using the outcome measurement instrument
developed for patients suffering from a stroke (i.e., developed under the
project Medicare Post-Acute Care: Quality Measurement),
two projects have been combined to study the outcome and costs of Medicare
post-acute care services for Medicare beneficiaries who have suffered a stroke
and are discharged from acute care hospitals to skilled nursing facilities
(SNFs), rehabilitation hospitals/units (RFs), home health agencies (HHAs), or
use multiple post-acute care settings. These studies will examine in a
post-prospective payment system environment the: (1) demographic and health
related characteristics of and assess the extent of overlap in stroke patients
treated in each of the post-acute care settings; (2) patterns of service use
and costs associated with the treatment of similar patients in each setting and
across episodes of care; (3) outcomes across an episode of care for similar
Medicare beneficiaries treated by each post-acute provider type and those
treated by multiple providers; (4) relationship between outcomes for similar
patients and differences in the mix and intensity of services provided, and
level of reimbursement across post-acute care providers and episodes of care;
and (5) core measures that may be most useful to incorporate into on-going
reporting requirements to monitor outcomes in each post-acute care setting and
across episodes of care. Medicare treats post-acute care
providers (skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation hospitals, and home
health agencies) differently--in terms of payment, eligibility, coverage, and
certification--even though these providers may be becoming more similar in the
types and intensity of services they provide and in the types of patients they
serve. This differential treatment may encourage admission to more costly
settings than is necessary or the delivery of unnecessary service. It is
important to understand the extent to which post-acute providers serve patients
with similar conditions and whether the use of one type of provider or pattern
of care relative to another results in superior health outcomes and at what
cost. This policy concern becomes even more urgent in light of the
extraordinary changes now being implemented in Medicare payment policies for
post-acute care providers. Each of Medicare's post-acute care providers is or
will shortly be subject to new prospective payment systems that will differ
among provider type. Payment reforms may create incentives to reduce services
to or avoid altogether medically complex, heavy care patients. It is important
that the Department understand the impact of its payment policies on the
quality of Medicare post-acute services and beneficiary access.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Andy Kramer, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO George Carcagno,
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2004 |
PURPOSE: A possible explanation for the recently
observed decline in the prevalence of disability in the U.S. elderly population
is that better treatment of chronic diseases through medical procedures and
pharmaceuticals has led to an improvement in functioning in the elderly
population. Lending some credence to this hypothesis is research by Freedman
and Martin (forthcoming in the American Journal of Public Health) that
documents an increase in the prevalence of chronic health conditions such as
arthritis, diabetes, stroke and heart disease during the same period that
disability has fallen. They hypothesize that changes in the management of
chronic disease--and changes in medication use in particular--have caused
chronic health conditions to become less debilitating as their prevalence has
increased.
Drug treatment has become an increasingly important aspect of medical care for older Americans
with approximately nine out of ten older Americans currently take one or more
prescription drugs daily. During the 1980s and early 1990s there have been
major shifts in the classes of drugs prescribed for some of the more
debilitating chronic conditions. For example, for arthritis, increased
availability of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, and, for women, estrogen replacement therapy may be
associated with fewer debilitating effects. New classes of psychotropic agents
have become available to treat depression and other psychiatric conditions,
which have been identified as a major cause of premature disability among the
elderly. Drug treatments for diabetes and hypertension have also expanded
significantly during this period.
This project supplements an existing National Institute on Aging grant to Vicki Freedman of the Philadelphia Geriatric Center. Under the grant Dr. Freedman is examining the
role of changes in the use of medications in explaining aggregate changes in
functioning in the U.S. population aged 51-61. The data sets for the analyses
are the first (1992) and fourth (1998) waves of the Health and Retirement
Survey (HRS), which provide nationally representative cross-sections of the
noninstitutionalized population in this age range.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Rose Maria Li, NIA |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Vicki Freedman,
Philadelphia Geriatric Center, Philadelphia, PA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Contribution of Medication Use to Recent Trends
in Old-Age Functioning
AUTHORS: Vicki A. Freedman and Hakan Aykan
DATE: August 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report
Abstract; Executive Summary
and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This project had two distinct foci. One was
the analysis of data from the 1994 National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) to
assist the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) actuaries in making cost
estimates of the potential effects of eliminating or redefining the requirement
that Medicare beneficiaries must be "homebound" in order to access the Medicare
home health benefit. The second was to analyze data from the Community
Caregiver Supplement to the 1996 National Medical Expenditures Survey (NMES)
Nursing Home Component. The purpose of this analysis was to understand the
factors that influenced decisions by severely disabled persons and their family
members that the severely disabled person should enter a nursing home. This
analysis will help guide the work of the CMS/ASPE Task Force on Promoting Home
and Community-Based Alternative to Nursing Home Care. In particular, the
analysis will help design the "Nurse Home Transition" grants program for the
states which ASPE and CMS plan to sponsor jointly. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Analyses of the 1994 NLTCS have
been completed. A memorandum of understanding was drafted with the Agency for
Health Care Policy Research to permit work to begin on the NMES data; however,
AHCPR was never able to complete the work that was required. Results from the NLTCS analyses
were shared with CMS staff, including the CMS Actuary's office and used to
estimate the costs associated with policy options for changing or eliminating
the Medicare HHA "homebound" requirement. These analyses served as the basis
for the Congressionally mandated report on Options for Redefining the Medicare
Homebound Requirement which CMS sent to Congress in 1999.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) Barbara Altman,
AHCPR |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Beth Jackson, The MEDSTAT
Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
July 2000 |
PURPOSE: The goal of this project is to develop a
conceptual framework that will guide a definition of coordination of care and
to develop corresponding measures of care coordination which can, in future
work, be field tested for validity and reliability, and become new tools to be
used by states and managed care organizations to improve their accountability
and performance.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Shoshanna Sofaer, City University of New York, New York, NY |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Coordination of Care for Persons with Disabilities Enrolled in Medicaid Managed Care: A Conceptual Framework to Guide the Development of Measures
AUTHORS: Shoshanna Sofaer, Barbara Kreling and Martha Carmel
DATE: December 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The Department currently has a limited
ability to model the impacts of alternative health, long-term care and
employment related policies on the program participation of younger individuals
with disabilities and public and private costs, both in the short and long run.
For example, none of the current models were capable of generating estimates
about the cost and impact of the Kennedy-Jeffords proposal to extend Medicaid
and Medicare coverage to SSI and/or SSDI disabled adults who return to work.
The purpose of this project is to develop preliminary design options for
constructing a microsimulation model of children, working age adults and their
families. Such a model would age a sample of persons over time, keeping track
of changes in their disability status, income, education, living arrangement,
program participation, employment, health insurance status, health and
long-term care service use, including personal assistance services/equipment.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Gina Livermore, The Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to develop a user-friendly book for states, providers, and consumers: (1) examining and documenting the new directions in consumer-centered care in nursing home settings; (2) exploring real or perceived regulatory barriers to designing consumer-centered models of care; (3) documenting innovative practitioners who have implemented consumer-centered activities and programs in their nursing homes; and (4) hypothesize about what is possible in the future in the provision of consumer-centered nursing home services and supports.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank
(Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Lisa Alecxih, The Lewin
Group, Fairfax, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2003 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to design a national survey of direct care workers in long-term care settings in order to obtain data on the size and characteristics of this workforce. The best available data suggests that there are approximately 2 million workers in these settings. This project will: (1) design a sampling frame for a nationally representative sample of direct care workers in long-term care settings; (2) establish data collection procedures for the survey; (3) develop data collection instruments; and (4) prepare an OMB clearance package.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to design a
research study of an admissions cohort of long-term care insurance claimants.
Claimants will be interviewed immediately upon triggering their benefits and
will be followed for approximately 18 months. This project is part of a
long-term research agenda being implemented by ASPE to better understand the
circumstances or factors that motivate elders who have purchased private
long-term care insurance benefits to file claims for benefits and how the
presence of private insurance affects decision-making about formal services use
for those who have been approved for benefits.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
LifePlans, Inc., Waltham,
MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: This project is aimed at identifying key
policy and programmatic challenges for bringing housing and services together
for low-income older Americans in a way that allows some "aging in place" and
prevents unnecessary nursing home admissions. It will assist ASPE to develop a
policy and research agenda that is responsive to changing trends, to actions on
Capitol Hill, and to the desires of the Administration to ensure an array of
community supports for aging seniors.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy
(Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet O'Keeffe, Research
Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2002 |
PURPOSE: This project will support Network activities related to the development of a set of concise measures of childhood
disability. The project will capitalize on recent conceptual and methodological
developments in the demographic, social and biomedical study of disability.
Specifically, the project will use data from the 1994 and 1995 disability
supplements to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D), the 1997 National
Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the 1992 and 1993 panels of the Survey of
Income and Program Participation to develop concise measures of disabilities in
children. The method of development will use two leading conceptual models of
disability: that of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
(NCMRR) and that of the World Health Organization (WHO). The intent of these
concise measures is to provide reliable sets of indicators that are sensitive
to subgroups of children to be used in population sample surveys and
survey-based surveillance systems. The childhood disability
measures developed under this project will be used to provide a national
estimate of the number of children with disabilities that is consistent with
current conceptual models of disability. Including these measures on
Departmental survey efforts is a cost effective means for collecting
information on the prevalence of childhood disability and the characteristics
of the population. Childhood disability information is needed for several
Departmental initiatives (e.g., Healthy People 2010).
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jeffrey Evans, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Concise Measures of Childhood Limitations
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version |
PURPOSE: This project is a continuation of support
for Network activities related to the development of a set of concise measures
of childhood disability with the specific focus on mental health and learning
disabilities. The project will continue to capitalize on recent conceptual and
methodological developments in the demographic, social and biomedical study of
disability. Specifically, the project will use data from the 1994 and 1995
disability supplements to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D), the
1997 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the 1992 and 1993 panels of
the Survey of Income and Program Participation to develop concise measures of
disabilities in children. Using a theoretically based approach, the project
will identify mental disorders and learning disabilities and their associated
disabilities in these national surveys, and develop concise measures of these
areas of disabilities in
children. The purpose of the
Interagency Agreement that supports this activity is to provide resources to
obtain consultation of two experts to guide this special aspect of the project:
an expert on child development with particular expertise in minority children
and school-age children of low birth weight; and a pediatrician who will
contribute a medical perspective on issues in age-appropriate development and
special needs school
population. The new concise
measures developed by this project are intended for inclusion on population
sample surveys and survey-based surveillance systems to monitor the prevalence
of childhood disability. The childhood disability measures developed under this
project will be used to provide a national estimate of the number of children
with disabilities that is consistent with current conceptual models of
disability. Including these measures on Departmental survey efforts is a cost
effective means for collecting information on the prevalence of childhood
disability and the characteristics of the population. Childhood disability
information is needed for several Departmental initiatives (e.g., Healthy
People 2010).
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jeffrey Evans, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: The overall purpose of this project is to develop, pilot, and disseminate an instrument to be used in national surveys to collect assistive device and environmental information from working age adults with disabilities and older persons living in the community. The project will include an analysis of data from the pilot study, and produce a report detailing the process, pilot work, findings, and final instrument. The dissemination phase will include a meeting of the major investigators on national health and disability surveys--both government and private (e.g., National Health Interview Survey, Current Population Survey, National Long-Term Care Survey, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Health and Retirement Survey)--to present the results of the pilot study and discuss ways of appropriately incorporating all or part of the instrument in various surveys.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan
(Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Georgeanne Patmios, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project will provide improved general-purpose information about the health and well-being of the population
in the United States and document trends over time, especially for those with
disabilities and/or chronic conditions. It will provide a more complete
description of the population with disabilities than can be obtained from the
survey data alone. The project will also provide data on specific topics of
interest to ASPE (e.g., the health status of Medicare beneficiaries before they
became eligible for Medicare). In addition, it will provide information on a
number of methodological issues, such as the correspondence between administrative files and survey responses. This project will identify
significant gaps in our knowledge of persons with disabilities, and help
eliminate those gaps in future data collection efforts.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Christine Cox, National
Center for Health Statistics, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project adds a disability component to
an existing HCFA (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)) evaluation of Medicaid 1115 waiver demonstrations in five
states, with a focus on the Tennessee evaluation. The study will follow the
experiences of SSI disabled children and adults (physically disabled, mentally
ill, mentally retarded, or developmentally disabled) enrolled in the TennCare
and TennPartners Programs. The project will conduct in-depth qualitative
analyses of the State's experience in enrolling individuals with disabilities
into managed care systems, and will conduct quantitative analysis to examine
cost and utilization data for these populations. The supplement will also
include a survey of disabled consumers to examine issues of satisfaction,
quality, health status, and functioning.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Craig Thornton, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2000 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Risk Selection Among SSI Enrollees in TennCare
AUTHORS: Steven C. Hill, Christopher Trenholm, Craig Thornton and Judith Wooldridge
DATE: February 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
SSI Enrollees in TennCare: Room for Improvement
AUTHORS: Steven S. Hill, Judith Wooldridge, Anne Ciemnecki, Karen CyBulski, Barbara Kolln, Michael Sinclair and Craig Thornton
DATE: February 15, 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: HCFA's (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)) existing evaluation examines the
impact of changes in the financing and delivery of health care services to AFDC
recipients and low income persons not eligible for Medicaid in the State of
Oregon, through the 1115 waiver demonstration authority. This supplement to the
Oregon evaluation adds a disability focus. The supplement will focus on the
experiences of SSI disabled children and adults (physically disabled, mentally
ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled) enrolled in the Oregon Health
Plan. The disability supplement will examine cost and utilization data, and
link these data to functional data collected by state agencies. In addition,
the supplement will conduct a survey of consumers and providers to examine
issues of satisfaction, access, quality, health status, and functioning.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet Mitchell, Health Economics Research, Inc., Waltham, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2000 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Enrolling Elderly and Disabled Beneficiaries in Medicaid Managed Care: Lessons Learned from the Oregon Health Plan
AUTHORS: Janet B. Mitchell and Paul Saucier
DATE: September 23, 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
Feasibility of Matching Medicare and Medicaid Data for Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in Oregon
AUTHORS: Carol J. Ammering and Debra A. Dayhoff
DATE: September 28, 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
The Exceptional Needs Care Coordinator in the Oregon Health Plan
AUTHORS: Edith G. Walsh, Gregory Todd French and Fred Bentley
DATE: February 7, 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: This project, coordinated with the Health
Care Financing Administration, will develop a linked Medicare/Medicaid data
base of beneficiaries to assist in research in this population. The project
will create an integrated data base with Medicare and Medicaid data to test
risk adjustment methodologies for dually eligible beneficiaries, and conduct
studies on program interactions between Medicare and Medicaid.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Hunter McKay
(Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) William Clark,
CMS |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Sue Dodds, Mathematica
Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2001 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to ascertain: (i) the current status of the implementation of electronic information systems in post-acute and long-term care settings; and (ii) the characteristics of and the factors that have facilitated or limited extensions of more robust electronic medical records and information systems from acute care settings into post-acute care and long-term care settings. More specifically, the project is intended to address the following research questions: - What electronic medical records and information systems are being used in acute, post-acute and long-term care?
- Which acute care health delivery systems that employ robust electronic medical records and information systems in the course of treating patients have extended electronic information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
- In selected acute care settings that have extended electronic information systems into affiliated post-acute/long-term care settings:
- What are the characteristics of the electronic information systems in both the acute, post-acute and long-term care settings? For example: What types of information are included in these systems? What messages are sent using these systems? Do these electronic systems support clinical decision making, monitoring the effectiveness of interventions, etc.? What messaging standards are used? What types of communication (e.g., one-way vs. two-way) are supported by these systems? How do these systems limit or enhance communication?
- What organizational, cultural, and technological barriers were confronted when extending electronic health information systems into post-acute/long-term care, and how were these resolved?
- What are the costs and benefits of extending such electronic health information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
- What additional electronic information systems are needed in post-acute/long-term care and what either supports or presents barriers to their implementation?
- What next steps could be pursued in extending electronic medical records and information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Andy Kramer, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver CO |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2004 |
PURPOSE: With Americans' increasing reliance on home and community-based services and assisted living facilities, it is critical for policy makers to monitor trends in long-term care use and the characteristics of the population outside of the traditional nursing home. Currently, there are two primary sources of comprehensive information on the living arrangements of older Americans and their use of long-term care services: the decennial Census and surveys specifically designed to collect data on the long-term care population (e.g., the National Nursing Home Survey [NNHS], the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey [MCBS], National Long-Term Care Survey [NLTCS]). Whether persons are classified as residing in an institution or not is greatly dependent on how the sampling frame is constructed (in the case for surveys) and/or how person's living arrangements are determined. Unfortunately, the census and surveys frequently use different data collection methods and approaches to categorizing living arrangements and long-term care service use. As a result, estimates of the number of persons in certain residential settings vary widely. For example, based on the 1996 MCBS, the number of older Americans living in assisted living facilities is approximately 420,000; however, the corresponding estimate from the 1999 NLTCS is nearly twice as high (810,000). Working with the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics, DALTCP staff will conduct a series of analyses of the most recent data to estimate and interpret variations in the size and characteristics of the long-term care population in different residential settings.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brenda Spillman, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
PURPOSE: From 1989 to 1992, there was a 210%
increase in Medicare expenditures for home health services. This increase in
utilization has generated widespread policy interest in appropriate measures to
control expenditures without compromising quality. Medicare home health has
been the subject of considerable research, but the actual practice of home
health care has not been extensively examined. This study will analyze
"episodes" of care under the Medicare home health benefit, assess the actual
practice of care, the extent to which there is variation in practice between
acute and long-term patients, and the factors that account for that variation.
This study will also examine decision-making processes between patients,
providers and physicians. What takes place during a visit and between visits as
"actual practice" has never been measured. Furthermore, the function of
decision-making by various parties has not been observed in "actual practice."
This effort to understand issues surrounding regional and practice variations
of home health care delivery will aid the Department and the industry in
combating fraud and abuse, as well as contribute valuable data to a future
prospective payment system.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Floyd Brown (Floyd.Brown@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Robert Schlenker, University of Colorado Center for Health Policy Research, Denver,
CO |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2001 |
PURPOSE: This project, co-sponsored by ASPE and
CMS's Office of Research and Demonstrations (ORD), is an evaluation of the
District of Columbia's 1115 waiver demonstration. The District's waiver is the
first approved demonstration to integrate acute and long-term care services for
SSI eligible children with disabilities in a single capitated payment system.
The study analyzed enrollment data and documented the experiences of the
District, the health plan, providers, and children and their families. The
study will be used to inform both state and federal policy makers who
increasingly regard managed care as a means of containing growing health care
expenditures. FINDINGS/RESULTS: In brief, the program concludes
that the capitated model tested in the Demonstration is not viable, in part
because the population of special needs children in the District is too small
to protect a plan against severe financial losses. Despite a proposal by DC
Medicaid to add stop-loss protection, the program announced that it will not
enter the waiver re-competition.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
David Kidder, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Evaluation of the District of Columbia's Demonstration Program, "Managed Care System for Disabled and Special Needs Children": Year One Report
AUTHORS: Robert Coulam, Carol Irvin, Michele Teitelbaum, Laurine Thomas and Tanisha Carino
DATE: July 28, 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Evaluation of the District of Columbia's Demonstration Program, "Managed Care System for Special Needs Children": Final Report
AUTHORS: Abt Associates
DATE: June 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Report Summary, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this delivery order contract is
to examine current state policies and practices regarding Medicaid funding for
services provided in assisted living settings. An understanding of these
policies and practices is needed to inform the Secretary and the Department
about Medicaid's current and potential role in providing services in this
increasingly popular residential setting.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy
(Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet O'Keeffe, Research
Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to prepare the
1999 NLTCS/ICS data file for analysis and to perform some preliminary
descriptive analyses. This is a necessary prerequisite for more detailed
analyses, which will be used to update the ASPE booklet "Informal Caregiving: Compassion in Action"
(published in 1998, based on 1995 NLTCS data).
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge,
MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2001 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to heighten
the awareness of federal, state and local policymakers about issues related to
the development of a quality long-term care workforce to meet the needs of our
aging society. The project will identify successful training, recruitment and
retention models for frontline long-term care workers, and policy and research
activities that can enhance and promote the expansion of a quality
paraprofessional long-term care workforce. The Office of Disability, Aging and
Long-Term Care Policy will collaborate with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
on this project. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, HRSA, AoA, the
Department of Education, AHRQ and the Department of Labor will also be involved
in this project.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Joshua Wiener, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Frontline Long-Term Care Worker Project: Summary of the Technical Expert Panel Meeting on Extrinsic Rewards and Incentives
DATE: June 15, 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Who Will Care for Us? Addressing the Long-Term Care Workforce Crisis
AUTHORS: Robyn I. Stone and Joshua M. Wiener
DATE: May 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary, Full HTML Report and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to develop a Handbook that describes and clarifies Medicaid's federal rules and regulations governing the application of Medicaid Optionsparticularly the Rehabilitation, the Targeted Case Management, and Clinic Optionsin creating an array of community-based mental health services, such as those constituting an Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) program, for working age adults with severe mental disorders. The Handbook also will provide examples of the range of community-based services for this population as drafted by states and supported by Medicaid as a practical guide for application by other states. Although Medicaid is not the only funding source for services for this population, Medicaid is important in providing community-based care for adults with severe mental disorders.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet O'Keeffe, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe health promotion, disease prevention and health education activities for the elderly, highlighting the range of these efforts throughout the Department. One of the primary goals of this effort will be to identify ways the Department can enhance health promotion/disease prevention programs for the elderly. This project will analyze health promotion/disease prevention strategies that seek to: (1) reduce behavioral risk factors; (2) encourage the use of preventive services; (3) strengthen the role of public health agencies in encouraging healthy behaviors; and (4) educate the elderly, their families and elder care providers in disease prevention and health promotion.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Donna Rabiner, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2004 |
PURPOSE: This project, to impute annual family
income on the NHIS, will complement the imputation work that has already been
carried out and will benefit from the advice of the senior statistician at the
University of Michigan who directed work on the imputation of the 1993-1995
family resources file. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The imputed data is available from
NCHS.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Diane Makuc, National
Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 1999 |
PURPOSE: The Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) has been involved in the past in designing a
modest respite benefit for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease for
inclusion in the President's budget. In 1998, there is renewed interest in
having proposals for respite services and other caregiver supports, on a
broader scale, incorporated into the President's long-term care budget
initiative. We are currently working with White House, OMB, and Treasury staff
to explore the use of tax incentives to help informal caregivers be able to
afford paid home care services as a supplement to their own informal efforts.
In order to respond to these kinds of policy analysis requests, it is important
for ASPE to look ahead and anticipate future data needs. In this case, the need
is to have data collection mechanisms in place to track, over time, changes in
the characteristics of informal caregivers of the disabled elderly, as we have
to follow changes in the population of disabled elders themselves. ASPE
supported the first and second Informal Caregiver's Supplement to the National
Long-Term Care Survey in 1982 and 1989 respectively. A third round of data
collection on informal caregivers is now needed in order to remain
up-to-date. Family members
typically initiate the process of nursing home placement for disabled elders
when they feel that the disabled elder needs more help than can be provided in
a home setting. Often families come to such a decision when one or more family
caregivers have been providing upwards of 60 hours per week of unpaid
assistance. This project will enable in-depth analysis of the conflicts
informal caregivers experience between employment and eldercare as well as
provide information about the health status of caregivers and measures of
caregiver stress and burden. These data can then be used in crafting policy
initiatives to support caregivers and prevent "caregiver burnout" which could
result in premature institutionalization. It will help determine whether and to
what extent caregivers' age, marital status, relationship to the care
recipient, household income, employment, health status, and various measures of
caregiver stress and burden are associated with greater or lesser use of
supplemental formal care. We will also be able to measure the extent to which
caregivers as well as the disabled elders themselves experience out-of-pocket
spending for supplemental home care.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: Data collection was completed in
1999. A "beta" file was made available in December 2000.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) Richard Suzman, NIA |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Kenneth Manton, Duke
University, Durham, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2000 |
PURPOSE: This project will help support the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) work on: (1) maintenance and improvement of the annual Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 30-country health data collection with respect to data quality, coverage, completeness and timeliness of the data collection, including documentation of sources and methods; (2) improved health accounts for better monitoring of changes in expenditure on health and its financing, and improved OECD Secretariat estimates to bridge gaps in national reporting on most recent expenditure trends; (3) analysis of developments in OECD health systems regarding health care financing and reform, and performance of health care systems; and (4) preparation of publications. This work is part of an ongoing project funded in part by the CMS and the member countries of the OECD. The products of this ongoing international initiative provide the foundation for health policy debate among the member nations.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brigid Goody, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to support
ongoing work related to monitoring and understanding changes in the prevalence
of disability in an international context. This work would focus on disability
measurement issues (e.g., developing consistent measures of elderly disability)
and efforts to understand the policy implications of changes in elderly
disability rates.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Stephane Jacobzone,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris,
France |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agreement is to transfer funds from ASPE to the National Center for Health Statistics to support the development of statistical and analytic reports from the forthcoming Inventory of Long Term Care Residential Places (ILTCRP). Although the National Nursing Home Survey collects data on nursing home residents, there is no comparable mechanism for collecting data on assisted living and related facilities. The inventory represents the first step in expanding the National Nursing Home Survey to include other long-term care places.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Amy Bernstein, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agreement is to co-sponsor a conference to be held by the President's Committee on Mental Retardation. The conference will: (1) identify and articulate the goals of the Nation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities; and (2) review the ways in which our national knowledge base and research endeavors contribute to monitoring and realizing success toward those national goals. The intent of the conference is to specify a national agenda of research, evaluation, demonstration and dissemination in order to maximize the potential for reaching the national goals by focusing on topics and issues of significance and by identifying priorities for resource allocations which demonstrate the most potential benefit.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Cille Kennedy (Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Laverdia Roach, President's Committee on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: Comprehensive and systematic information on existing and emerging technologies in long-term care settings is not currently available, and there is no existing framework to document and evaluate these systems' ease of use, cost benefit ratio, and contribution to the quality of life of service recipients and quality of care they receive. In addition, the barriers to the implementation of such technologies in long-term care settings have not been systematically identified. This project aims at filling these important information gaps. Thus, the main purpose of this project is to construct and maintain a searchable, updateable lexicon (i.e., a comprehensive database) of existing and emerging technologies in long-term care settings that will be made available through a web-based interface. The project also aims at identifying and examining legal, financial, and social barriers to the process of implementing these technologies in long-term care settings.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Kimberly Van Haitsma, Polisher Research Institute, North Wales, PA Vicki Freedman, Polisher Research Institute, North Wales, PA |
PURPOSE: This project is a supplement to an ongoing
four-year study of the implications of welfare reform for low-income families
living in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio (a summary of the study is available
at http://www.jhu.edu/~welfare). The
broader study is being undertaken by researchers at Johns Hopkins University,
Pennsylvania State University, Harvard University, University of Chicago, and
the University of Texas-Austin. Funds are being used to explore how welfare
reform is affecting the lives of a particularly vulnerable subset of the
welfare population--adults and children with disabilities. This will be
accomplished by conducting longitudinal case studies of families with members
with disabilities receiving TANF and through a broader survey effort. The
purpose of the data collection efforts is to better understand how recent work
participation requirements and time limits under welfare reform are affecting
service utilization, family member's health and development, support networks,
parenting, and child care arrangements.
ASPE, the Administration for Children and Families, and the Administration on Developmental Disabilities are
the primary funders of the disability component of the study. The National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development is the primary funder of the
broader study, along with several private foundations. The first round of
interviews for the main survey were conducted from March 1999 until December
1999. Fieldwork in the ethnography component began in fall 1999 and is ongoing.
Results form the project will be available over the course of the study. Listed
below are the current publications from the broader study; results from the
ethnographies focused on disability will be available later.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Jefferey Evans, NICHD |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Andrew Cherlin, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Diversity of Welfare Leavers
AUTHORS: Robert Moffitt and Jennifer Roff
DATE: September 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full PDF Report |
What Welfare Recipients Know About the New Rules and What They Have to Say About Them
AUTHORS: Andrew Cherlin, Pamela Winston, Ronald Angel, Linda Burton, P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, Robert Moffit, William Julius Wilson, Rebekah Levine Coley and James Quane
DATE: July 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: The overall purpose of this project is to enhance DALTCP's understanding of the circumstances or factors that motivate elders who have purchased private long-term care insurance benefits to file claims for benefits, and how the availability of insurance coverage influences their service-seeking behavior after they have been approved to receive benefits. The findings of this project are expected to help the government assess the future potential of private long-term care insurance as a method of financing long-term care services, especially home and community-based services.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) Hunter McKay (Hunter.McKay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
LifePlans, Inc., Waltham, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to analyze survey and insurance policy sales data on the attitudes and perspectives of the federal workforce related to the first offering of group long-term care insurance. The analysis shall primarily focus on the motivations behind different participation decisions as well as on measuring the general level of awareness of the risk of needing long-term care. Long Term Care Partners (the insurer making the federal offering) is funding and managing the collection of the survey data, which will be provided to ASPE for analysis. The survey sample is drawn from three distinct groups: buyers (bought the product), non-buyers (requested information but did not buy), and non-respondents (neither bought the product nor requested information). The results of the data analysis shall be compared to other studies of buyers and non-buyers in the general group and individual markets. The project will provide insights into the motivations of various groups to participate, or not, in this long-term care insurance offering, and gauge the importance of awareness of long-term care risk in the insurance purchase decision.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.McKay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
LifePlans, Inc., Waltham, MA |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to provide logistical and conference planning support for a two-day 100-person invitational conference on long-term care insurance. The goal of the conference is to bring together two groups that do not typically interact: representatives of the long-term care insurance industry who design and administer policies or do market research, and public policy officials. The objectives of this meeting will be to break down barriers, share information, and develop a joint research and policy agenda for future work. Conference attendees will include: long-term care insurance providers, university researchers, academia, long-term care insurance researchers, federal and state government officials, and long-term care insurance advocacy representatives.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Dan Gaylin, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL |
COMPLETION DATE | June 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project will update and expand the
capability of the Brookings/ICF Long-Term Care Financing Model, which currently
takes a national sample of persons, ages them over time, and estimates their
long-term care use and financing when they become elderly. It will incorporate
results from recent surveys of nursing homes and home care utilization; e.g.,
the 1989 and 1994 National Long-Term Care Surveys. The model will also be
expanded to include acute care use and expenditures, and the period of
simulation will be extended to 2050. The economic assumptions will be updated. The model will continue to
be used to project future trends and to perform policy simulations, including
expanded coverage for nursing home and home care, changes in Medicaid
eligibility and services, and expanded enrollment in private long-term care
insurance plans. It will also be used to estimate the impact of changing trends
in disability and the combined burden of acute and long-term care services on
the elderly.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Lisa Alecxih, The Lewin Group, Alexandria, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Brookings/ICF Long-Term Care Financing Model: Designing and Using Model Simulations
AUTHORS: Lisa Marie B. Alecxih and David L. Kennell
DATE: February 1992
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Executive Summary |
Brookings/ICF Long-Term Care Financing Model: Model Assumptions
AUTHORS: David L. Kennell, Lisa Maria B. Alecxih, Joshua M. Wiener and Raymond J. Hanley
DATE: February 1992
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Brookings/ICF Long-Term Care Financing Model: Programmer's/Operator's Manual
AUTHORS: Lisa Alecxih and Peter Robertshaw
DATE: February 1992
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Executive Summary |
Brookings/ICF Long-Term Care Financing Model: User's Guide to Specifying Simulations
AUTHORS: Lisa Alecxih and Peter Robertshaw
DATE: February 1992
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Executive Summary |
PURPOSE: The last decade has brought tremendous changes in the health care system as payers and providers struggle to bring
health care expenditures under control. However, it remains unknown how this
transforming health care system will affect the health and well-being of people
with significant disabilities and chronic illnesses. The Medicare program has
lagged behind the private insurance market and even the Medicaid program in the
proportion of its beneficiaries participating in managed care plans. In 1995,
about 2.3 million older persons out of a total Medicare beneficiary population
of 25 million were enrolled in the Medicare Risk Program implemented under
TEFRA. There is little information on the experience of older persons with
disabilities in these and other managed care plans.
The purpose of this study is to: (1) address the characteristics of elderly persons with chronic illnesses
and disabilities that need to be accommodated in designing and operating
managed delivery systems (MDS); (2) examine the issues that health care policy
makers, plan administrators and providers need to consider in designing,
operating, and monitoring MDS for the elderly with disabilities and chronic
illness; (3) examine how MDS actually perform in meeting the needs of the
elderly disabled; and (4) identify the factors that influence the success of
MDS in meeting the needs of this population.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Craig Thornton, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Constrained Innovation in Managing Care for High-Risk Seniors in Medicare + Choice Risk Plans
AUTHORS: Craig Thornton, Sheldon Retchin, Kenneth D. Smith, Peter D. Fox, William Black and Rita Stapulonis
DATE: January 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary, Full HTML Report and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: The number of Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care grew from 4.8 million in 1993 to 16.6 million in 1998. During 1998, there were more Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care than there were in fee-for-service. Given the strength of the movement toward managed care, it is no surprise that states have begun to experiment with managed long-term care. Selected states have developed and implemented managed long-term care programs for a wide set of beneficiaries. Arizona, Michigan Texas, and Wisconsin are currently operating such programs and are planning on expansion. While many of these programs are being evaluated, very little is known about the public and private organizations that are entering this new managed care market. This study attempts to get a better understanding of what organizations are moving into this arena and a preliminary look at how they manage the provision of long-term care services as compared to the fee-for-service models with which we have become familiar.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay
(Hunter.McKay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brian Burwell, MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this contract is to evaluate
changes in the Medicare home health service delivery system over the past five
years. Between 1996 and 2000, Medicare home health services have experienced
several major changes that led to a significant reduction in the number of home
health care providers and decline in the use of Medicare home health services.
Findings from the study will assist HHS in its continued monitoring efforts of
the home health benefit as well as provide recommendations for future policy
options.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Cille Kennedy (Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Korbin Liu, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C. |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
May 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project developed four outcome
measurement instruments and methods of data collection that could be used in
future research to examine outcomes and costs associated with Medicare
post-acute care (PAC) services for patients who have suffered a stroke,
congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, and back and neck conditions. These
conditions were selected because of their prevalence within and across PAC
settings. The instruments and the data collection methodology will be revised
based on two field tests and technical expert input. The outcome measurement
instrument developed for stroke patients will be used in other ASPE funded
studies (i.e., Comparative Study of the Outcomes and Costs
Associated with Medicare Post-Acute Services in Skilled Nursing Facilities,
Rehabilitation Hospitals/Units, and Home Health Settings).
FINDINGS/RESULTS: The final report provides the
policy framework for the development of these instruments, and discusses the
methods used to develop the instruments. In addition, an instrument is
available for each of the studied conditions.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Andy Kramer, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
Korbin Liu, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Medicare Post-Acute Care: Quality Measurement Final Report
AUTHORS: Marie Johnson, Danielle Holthaus, Jennie Harvell, Eric Coleman, Theresa Eilertsen and Andrew Kramer
DATE: March 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to link Medicare utilization data to other data elements for the community-based claimants included in the Long-Term Care Insurance Panel. This will be done in an effort to get a better understanding of the relationship between private long-term care insurance and the use of Medicare financed services. The proposed contract will examine the relationship between long-term care and acute or post-acute care service utilization prior to, during and after the time of claim. The project will also include comparisons to similarly disabled noninsured community residents in the general population using the 1994 NLTCS sample. Self-reported data in the previously completed study indicated that private long-term care insurance claimants use significantly less Medicare home health services than a comparable non-insured group. However, the findings for the non-insured group are based on National Long-Term Care Survey data which includes actual Medicare claims for home health. This study will enable a more rigorous comparison of claims data for both the private ltc insurance claimants and the comparable NLTCS respondents.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Marc Cohen, LifePlans, Inc., Waltham, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2001 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
The Impact of Private Long-Term Care Insurance Benefits on Selected Medicare Services
AUTHORS: Jessica Miller, Boryana Dimitrova and Marc Cohen
DATE: March 12, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 mandated major changes in home health payment requiring the implementation of a
Prospective Payment System (PPS) by October 1999 (later delayed until October
2000) and an Interim Payment System (IPS) prior to the implementation of PPS.
It also contained changes in eligibility and coverage for home health services.
These changes, while intended to reduce Medicare home health costs, run the
risk of reducing beneficiaries' access to appropriate care and adversely
affecting health outcomes, especially for beneficiaries needing the most care
(Komisar and Feder 1998, Smith and Rosenbaum 1998, MedPAC 1999, GAO 1998, Gage,
1998). Disabled Medicare beneficiaries are especially vulnerable. The purpose of this project is
to study the impact of recent payment policy changes on disabled Medicare
beneficiaries' satisfaction and quality of life with a view toward formulating
inferences that will inform national home health care policy for the disabled.
The study will build on a research project recently funded by the Home Care
Research Initiative of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that examines the
direct and indirect effects of the BBA changes. The project's main focus is to
examine BBA impacts on Medicare beneficiaries' access to care, costs,
satisfaction, and quality of care. Also examined will be the effects on
agencies and on the overall health system.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Floyd Brown
(Floyd.Brown@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Nelda McCall, Laguna
Research Associates, San Francisco, CA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
April 2002 |
PURPOSE: This project will analyze the 1984-1999 National Long-Term Care Survey with the purpose of: (1) examining the relationship between declines in elderly disability and health care utilization and costs, using Medicare claims data, (2) describing changes in the elderly's use of assistive devices for activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, and (3) updating selected statistics reported in Older Americans 2000: Key Indicators of Well-Being.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Brenda Spillman, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
July 2004 |
PURPOSE: Because of the difference in views as to
whether or not the homebound coverage requirement is being applied appropriately, it would be extremely useful to have measures of the homebound
status of a sample of Medicare beneficiaries currently receiving services. The
NHHCS is the only nationally representative survey that samples and collects
descriptive data on all current users of home health services (including
nonelderly as well as home health users age 65 and older) during the period
when they are actually in a home health episode. Because over 70% of home
health services are Medicare-financed, the sample of current patients is
predominantly comprised of Medicare beneficiaries. The NHHCS Current Patient
Survey includes descriptive information on users of home health services,
including a number of potential indicators of "homebound" status. Additional
information on indicators of homebound status may be obtained from the Outcome
and Assessment Informal Set (OASIS) instruments where these were completed and
are present in patients' files. Because CMS has announced its intention to
mandate the use of the OASIS instrument to assess home health patients' care
needs upon admission and health status outcomes at discharge or every 60 days
when their continued need for home health services is recertified, many home
health agencies have already begun using the OASIS instrument on a routine
basis. It is therefore estimated that a high percentage of patients selected
for the NHHCS Current Patient Survey will have completed OASIS instruments
available. NCHS has agreed to include in the data collection for these patients
a limited set of items from the OASIS. Although these data from the NHHCS will
not be available in time to be incorporated into the BBA-mandated Report to
Congress on alternative definitions of homebound status, we believe that it
will be useful to be able to report to the Congress that HHS has established a
mechanism for obtaining nationally representative data on the extent to which
home health patients meet various indicators of "homebound" status.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: NCHS completed the work and has
provided ASPE with a data file for analysis.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Thomas McLemore,
National Center for Health Statistics, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2001 |
|
INFORMATION AVAILABLE |
Home and Hospice Care Survey data file (contact the National Center for Health Statistics for availability) |
PURPOSE: The Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term
Care Policy has launched a special development initiative to address the
critical shortage of paraprofessional workers across the full spectrum of
long-term care settings. The project is a partnership between the Institute for
the Future of Aging Services, a policy research center within the American
Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, and the Paraprofessional
Health Care Institute, a national nonprofit healthcare employment and advocacy
organization. The project team will:
- Develop specifications for a new program of demonstration grants designed to bring about changes in provider practice
and public policy that reduce high rates of vacancy and turnover among
paraprofessional staff and improve the quality of their jobs.
- Design a public awareness strategy to increase public recognition of the role of the direct care worker in long-term
care.
- Create a database of promising provider practices designed to improve worker recruitment, retention and job quality and
related research and evaluation studies. The database will be accessible
through the websites of the National Clearinghouse on the Direct Care
Workforce, ASPE, and IFAS.
- Develop an applied research plan to investigate the nature, causes and impact of direct care workforce problems and
support select studies of workforce issues. Initial studies include: an
ethnographic study comparing workers who continue in the long-term care field
for many years and workers who choose to leave; and the development of a
concept paper specifying the requirements for modeling worker supply and
demand.
- Prepare and disseminate three policy briefs on issues influencing the availability of direct care workers and the
efficacy of policy interventions designed to reduce vacancies and turnover. The
first policy brief will examine state "wage pass through" initiatives.
- Prepare and disseminate two working papers: (1) a synthesis of lessons learned from workforce related research and
evaluation studies, public policy and regulatory initiatives and innovative
provider and worker practices; and (2) a concept paper analyzing how workforce
improvement must be taken into account in developing new models for promoting
long-term care quality.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Association of Homes and Services for the Aged, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
June 2004 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
State Wage Pass-Through Legislation: An Analysis DATE: December 20, 2002 AVAILABLE ONLINE:
Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS)
is the major source of information on the elderly persons with chronic
disabilities. The survey has been administered in 1982, 1984, 1989, 1994, and
1999. The survey provides nationally representative data on the
characteristics, service use and long-term care expenditures of the frail
elderly living both in the community and in institutions. ASPE originated the
NLTCS in 1982 and co-funded it with the Health Care Financing Administration
(now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) as part of an overall
long-term care data collection strategy. ASPE has continued to provide periodic
funding since.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Richard Suzman, NIA |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Kenneth Manton, Duke University, Durham, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 1999 |
INFORMATION AVAILABLE |
NLTCS Website URL: http://www.cds.duke.edu/index.html |
Introduction to the National Long-Term Care Survey
AUTHORS: Robert F. Clark
DATE: August 21, 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
National Long-Term Care Surveys (1982, 1984, 1989)
AUTHORS: Robert Clark
DATE: March 1992
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Under an ASPE-NIA Interagency Agreement,
ASPE funds will be used to support a Next-of-Kin Supplemental Survey as part of
the 1994 NLTCS. Approximately 4,800 persons who are selected for interviews
under the 1994 NLTCS will have died between 1989 and 1994. The next-of-kin or
other knowledgeable persons will be interviewed about the deceased person's use
of medical and long-term care services. These data will become part of the 1994
NLTCS data set. ASPE funding will permit the survey to obtain information on an
estimated 80% of decedents. The information on decedents is needed in order to
make a number of important estimates, such as total long-term care costs and
the extent to which nursing home residents spend-down to qualify for Medicaid
benefits. Because the 1989 NLTCS did not contain a survey on decedents, it was
not possible to generate an estimate of total nursing home and other long-term
care service use for that survey population. A Next-of-Kin Survey on decedents
will help remedy this problem.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Kenneth Manton, Duke
University, Durham, NC Larry Corder, Duke
University, Durham, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 1999 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to develop
and test the effectiveness of a National Consortium and Resource Center (NCRC)
to improve access to consumer responsive home and community-based long-term
care for people with disabilities of all ages. The long range purpose of such a
center would be to foster long-term care policies and practices that: (1)
assist in "leveling the playing field" between institutional and
community-based models of long-term care; (2) provide consumers with more
control over choosing the setting in which they receive long-term care; (3)
expand the range of high quality consumer responsive residential options,
personal assistance, other home and community-based supports and health related
services available to people with significant mental and physical disabilities
who wish to live in home and community-based settings; (4) promote parity and
equity between the availability of institutional and home and community-based
long-term care; (5) explore the potential for managed care organizations to
utilize and expand consumer directed home and community care; and (6) support
financing and delivery approaches to consumer responsive home and
community-based services that enable states to manage and control their
long-term care expenditures.
Approximately 13 million people of all ages have disabilities which impede their ability to carry out one or
more of the routine activities of daily life. Slightly over half are over 65
years of age, the remainder are children and working age adults. The vast
majority of the services and care available to these 13 million people is
provided voluntarily by families. However, a significant number, mostly those
persons who are significantly impaired, may have no family caregivers, and
receive formal long-term care services that are largely publicly financed
through state Medicaid programs. Barring a fundamental shift in public
financing that few expect, the Medicaid program will continue to be the
principal purchaser of public long-term care services well into the next
century. Several factors
offer new opportunities and pose new dilemmas for long-term care policy and
program development in the 21st century. Clearly, consumers, policy makers, and
providers are experiencing some tensions in their relationships as a result of
several of the above factors. The Department of Health and Human Services,
along with several other federal agencies is committed to facilitating the
development of a common agenda among the stakeholders in long-term care policy
and program development at all levels, one that supports consumer decision
making and choice.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brian Burwell, The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2001 |
INFORMATION AVAILABLE |
Official Website URL: http://www.hcbs.org |
|
Highlights: Inventory of Consumer-Directed Support Programs
AUTHORS: Pamela Doty and Susan Flanagan
DATE: 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: "Assisted living" refers to residential
settings for people with disabilities which combine both housing and personal
assistance services within a homelike or noninstitutional environment. The
number of assisted facilities nationally is not known; estimates range from
8,000 to 30,000. Similarly, estimates for the number of frail elderly and other
persons residing in such facilities range from 350,000 to 1,000,000. This study
will, among other things, generate a more reliable estimate of the number of
these facilities and their residents. As assisted living options multiply, a
challenge facing the federal and state governments is how to regulate such
arrangements, balancing consumer protection concerns (especially if public
funds reimburse costs) with resident rights for self-direction, taking risks
and maintaining accustomed lifestyles.
The major purpose of this project is to analyze the role of assisted living within the current long-term
care system from the perspective of consumers, owners/operators, workers,
regulators, investors and other stakeholders, and to issue a report on its
current status and future directions. The study will address several broad
policy-relevant issues, including supply and demand trends; barriers; how
closely practice parallels philosophy; the impact of key features on outcomes;
and quality and accountability. The contractor will assist HHS and other
federal agencies in the formulation of regulatory and financing policy options
for assisted living. A Technical Advisory Group has been established to provide
guidance to the contractor.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: As of 1998, there were
approximately 11,500 facilities nationwide which met the study's definition of
"assisted living facilities" (ALFs) with approximately 600,000 beds and 500,000
residents. The average bed size was 53. About 72 percent of facilities
characterized themselves as "assisted living facilities." 55% of ALFs were
freestanding; 45% were part of a multi-level campus (usually with a related
nursing facility). Forty-one percent of ALFs in the survey met the study
criteria for "high privacy," "high service," or both. On average, residents of
ALFs are considerably less functionally disabled than nursing facility
residents.
Most ALFs cannot guarantee "aging in place" to their residents because in most ALFs residents
with severe functional dependencies (such as requiring help with transferring),
those with cognitive impairment that progressed from mild to moderate to
severe, as well as residents who exhibited behavioral problems would be
discharged from the facility. The median base rate in the ALFs surveyed was
$1800 per month, which is more than most elders can afford based on income
alone; they would need to tap into their assets (which might well involve
financing ALF costs through the sale of a home). Results from the discharge
survey indicate that, on an annualized basis, approximately 8 percent of
residents move to a nursing home and 4 percent move to some other residential
care setting (such as another ALF). Residents of "low service" ALFs and those
with significant cognitive impairments are more likely than residents of other
ALFs or other residents in their facility to move to a nursing home. Surveys of
current ALF residents found that residents generally felt that they were
treated with respect, affection and dignity; however, they did report concerns
about the adequacy of staffing levels and about high staff turnover.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Catherine Hawes, Myers Research Institute, Beechwood, OH |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
June 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Assisted Living Policy and Regulation: State Survey
AUTHORS: Robert L. Mollica
DATE: April 1995
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Differences Among Services and Policies in High Privacy or High Service Assisted Living Facilities
AUTHORS: Charles D. Phillips, Catherine Hawes and Miriam Rose
DATE: November 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Family Members' Views: What is Quality in Assisted Living Facilities Providing Care to People with Dementia?
AUTHORS: Catherine Hawes, Angela Greene, Merry Wood and Cynthia Woodsong
DATE: February 1997
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
Guide to Assisted Living and State Policy
AUTHORS: Robert L. Mollica, Keren Brown Wilson, Barbara S. Ryther and Heather Johnson Lamarche
DATE: May 1995
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
High Service or High Privacy Assisted Living Facilities, Their Residents and Staff: Results from a National Survey
AUTHORS: Catherine Hawes, Charles D. Phillips and Miriam Rose
DATE: November 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Discharged Residents Telephone Survey Data Collection and Sampling Report
DATE: October 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Final Summary Report
AUTHORS: Catherine Hawes, Charles D. Phillips and Miriam Rose
DATE: November 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Literature Review Update
AUTHORS: Lewin-VHI, Inc.
DATE: February 1996
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Report on In-Depth Interviews with Developers
AUTHORS: Barbara B. Manard and Rosemary Cameron
DATE: December 1997
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Results of a National Survey of Facilities
AUTHORS: Catherine Hawes, Miriam Rose and Charles D. Phillips
DATE: December 14, 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Residents Leaving Assisted Living: Descriptive and Analytic Results From a National Survey
AUTHORS: Charles D. Phillips, Catherine Hawes, Kathleen Spry and Miriam Rose
DATE: June 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
State Assisted Living Policy: 1996
AUTHORS: Robert L. Mollica and Kimberly Irwin Snow
DATE: November 1996
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary |
State Assisted Living Policy: 1998
AUTHORS: Robert L. Mollica
DATE: June 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: ASPE and AoA have an interest in the policy implications of fostering the NORC concept as a way of encouraging aging in place, supporting people at home and in the community, and conceivably forestalling unnecessary institutional acute or long-term care. The examination of these grantees will serve a dual purpose: to provide specific formative research on implementation issues associated with organizing services for NORCs, and to highlight broader policy implications of identifying and making use of the NORC concept as a way of organizing community-based care in response to an aging population.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jane Tilly, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to provide a
descriptive study for all 50 states that: (1) summarizes and synthesizes state
long-term care reforms into a series of themes; (2) identifies the types of
processes used by states to develop and implement their reforms; and (3)
identifies the federal/state approvals and the financial and other resources
necessary for implementation.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Colleen Sonosky, George Washington University, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
April 2003 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
State Long-Term Care: Recent Developments and Policy Directions
AUTHORS: Barbara Coleman, Wendy Fox-Grage and Donna Folkemer
DATE: July 26, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Full HTML Report and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: In this project, the perspectives of various policymakers and experts on the need for, expectations and feasibility of collecting health and functional assessment information that includes comparable data elements in a manner that minimizes provider burden. Specifically, policymakers and experts will be asked to:
- Identify and prioritize objectives/purposes/regulatory needs of collecting health and functional assessment information across a variety of Medicare benefits (e.g., acute in-patient hospital stays, post-acute care services, and other services).
- Consider the extent to which objectives are common across Medicare benefits and identify the types (domains) of information that may be needed across benefits to determine if these objectives have been achieved.
- Consider the applicability of information learned from this study to the provision in the Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA) of 2000 that requires HHS to submit, by January 2005, a report to Congress on the development of standard instruments for the assessment of health and functional status of Medicare beneficiaries.
- Discuss the PROs and CONs of various methods of collecting patient health and functional status information (e.g., freestanding hard copy or electronic patient assessment instruments, expansion of existing electronic data systems such as claims data, implementation of new automated data systems, etc.) and the alternative entities that could maintain that information (e.g., the government, providers, etc.).
- Identify how information technology could facilitate the use and applications of health and functional patient barriers to the use of such technology.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: Government and non-government stakeholder perspectives have been obtained on various Medicare program objectives for a wide variety of Medicare providers (e.g., acute in-patient hospital stays, post-acute care services, and other services). Generally, stakeholders agreed that patient health and functional information is/may be needed to support various payment systems. There were different opinions about the utility of patient health and functional information to measure quality. An initial framework was been developed that begins to frame the response to a series of questions that were asked when the project was initially awarded (e.g., what are the various services and purposes for which Medicare collects patient health and functional information; for which Medicare services would patient health and functional information be most useful and why; what are the various objectives of the government collecting this information; what types of data would be most useful to achieve specified objectives (e.g., summary scores vs. detailed assessment of signs and symptoms); can electronic information systems be used to increase the efficiency and accuracy of data collection, and if so, what is the most appropriate role for the Federal Government in this arena).
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Barbara Manard, The Manard Company, Chevy Chase, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2001 |
PURPOSE: This project, which is being done in collaboration with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, will employ a classical
experimental research design (i.e., random assignment of participants to
treatment and control groups) to test the effects of "cashing out" Medicaid-funded personal assistance services for the disabled. The
demonstration will include elderly as well as younger disabled consumers. Two
states are expected to participate in the demonstration. In these States,
control group members will receive "traditional" benefits--i.e., case managed
home and community-based services, where payments for services are made to
vendors--while treatment group members receive a monthly cash payment in an
amount roughly equal to the cash value of the services they would have received
under the traditional program. It is hypothesized that cash
payments will foster greater client autonomy and that, as a result, consumer
satisfaction will be greater. Consumers are expected to purchase a somewhat
different mix of disability-related services and/or assistive technologies when
they make the decisions and payments themselves than when case managers
contract with vendors on their behalf. It is also hypothesized that States will
save Medicaid monies (mostly in administrative expenses) from cashing out
benefits. The analysis will consider the effects of the demonstration according
to the varying characteristics of the consumers including age, disability,
gender, family support, and other factors. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Early findings indicate very high
satisfaction scores for treatment group participants in Arkansas. Per person
per month spending for treatment vs. control group members in AR indicates that
the experimental program is budget neutral. Spending for personal care services
is higher for treatment group members but spending on all other Medicaid
services is lower and, in particular, spending on institutional services
(nursing facility and hospital care) is 18% lower for the experimental group
members than for the control group members. No results are as yet available for
New Jersey or Florida.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Kevin Mahoney, University of Maryland, College Park, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2004 |
INFORMATION AVAILABLE |
Arkansas Website URL: http://www.independentchoices.com |
New Jersey Website URL: http://www.state.nj.us/humanservices/dds/ |
Cash and Counseling Demonstration: An Experiment in Consumer-Directed Personal Assistance Services
AUTHORS: Pamela J. Doty
DATE: 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Cash and Counseling: Consumer's Early Experiences in Arkansas
AUTHORS: Leslie Foster, Randall Brown, Barbara Carlson, Barbara Phillips and Jennifer Schore
DATE: October 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Determining Consumer Preferences for a Cash Option: Arkansas Survey Results
AUTHORS: Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Kevin J. Mahoney, Sharon M. Desmond, Dawn M. Shoop, Marie R. Squillace and Robert A. Fay
DATE: 1997
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to provide
selected background materials and the logistics needed to plan and implement
four state meetings and a 2-day national conference on consumer-directed models
of care for people with disabilities and the elderly. DALTCP will collaborate
with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Social Security
Administration, and the Administration on Aging on this project.
The goal of the state meetings and the conference is to bring together
researchers, practitioners and policymakers to identify future directions for
policy development and research which promote effective and responsive
consumer-directed services systems for the elderly and people with
disabilities. The meetings and conference will educate policymakers and
consumers at a state and national level about consumer directed models of care,
by addressing the issues, concerns and policy barriers and opportunities that
they identify. The audience that the meetings and conference will target
include: state policymakers, congressional staff with jurisdiction over health
care and taxation, state legislatures, state legislative staff, federal
policymakers, consumers, and advocates--all of whom are critical to the
expansion of consumer-directed personal assistance models.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Betty Wood, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL Nora
Lee, Technical Resources International, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
July 2002 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Consumer Directed Care and Nurse Practice Acts
AUTHORS: Susan Reinhard
DATE: June 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final report |
INDEPENDENT CHOICES: A National Symposium on Consumer-Direction and Self-Determination for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities--conference package
DATE: June 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Independent Choices: National Symposium on Consumer-Directed Care and Self-Determination for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities--Summary Report
AUTHORS: Marie R. Squillace
DATE: February 15, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract; Full Report awaiting final review |
PURPOSE: The Temporary Assistance to Needy Families
(TANF) program, created through the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity and Reconciliation Act, allows States more flexibility in defining
program parameters than was allowed under the former AFDC program, and places a
stronger emphasis on participation in work and work-related activities. One of
the groups that may be affected by this increased flexibility and stronger work
emphasis are disabled recipients and caretakers of disabled recipients, who
were previously exempt from participation requirements.
This project, jointly funded by
the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and the
Social Security Administration, will collect and disseminate information on how
states are implementing TANF and addressing issues that are relevant to persons
with disabilities and/or their caretakers. The primary goal of the study is to
provide information to States that is useful for helping them to either develop
or refine their own programs serving persons with disabilities. The project has
two main components: (1) a review of States' efforts to assist persons with
disabilities and caretakers in preparing for, and participating in, work or
work-related activities, and (2) a series of case studies of the more promising
programs.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Pamela Holcomb, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
April 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
State Welfare-to-Work Policies for People with Disabilities: Changes Since Welfare Reform
AUTHORS: Terri S. Thompson, Pamela A. Holcomb, Pamela Loprest and Kathleen Brennan
DATE: October 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full PDF Report |
State Welfare-to-Work Policies for People with Disabilities: Implementation Challenges and Considerations
AUTHORS: Pamela A. Holcomb and Terri S. Thompson
DATE: August 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to assist ASPE
staff in using the Long-Term Care Financing Model (LTCFM), a microsimulation
model developed with previous ASPE support to perform projections and policy
simulations of the elderly's long-term care use and expenditures. This project
will keep the model's assumptions and parameters updated as better and more
recent data become available. The contractor will also assist ASPE staff in
designing the base case simulation and various policy simulations, such as
examining the impacts of disability trends, projecting the growth of private
long-term care insurance (including the effects of tax incentives) examining
the impacts of retirement income trends, and examining how long-term care may
impact on Medicaid budgets and labor markets for nurses and paraprofessional.
Other policy issues may be addressed with the model as ASPE's needs evolve over
the course of this project.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Lisa Alecxih, The Lewin
Group, Falls Church, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2002 |
PURPOSE: Analysis of the utilization and costs of
prescription drug coverage for people with disabilities will help the
Department better understand the needs of people with disabilities when
debating a Medicare drug benefit and/or refining prospective payment systems
for skilled nursing facilities. Previous research has focused almost
exclusively on Medicare beneficiaries living in community settings; yet,
beneficiaries who are in institutional settings (nursing homes, assisted
living, and retirement homes) are very heavy utilizers of prescription drugs.
This study will focus on the prescription drug needs of these populations and
help the Department consider potential research and demonstration activities to
enhance access to or quality of prescription drugs benefits in the
future.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Bruce Stuart, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Graying of Medicare's Disabled Population: Implication for a Medicare Drug Benefit
AUTHORS: Dennis Shea, Becky Briesacher, Bruce Stuart and Jalpa Doshi
DATE: March 28, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Medication Use by Medicare Beneficiaries Living in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities
AUTHORS: Becky Briesacher, Bruce Stuart and Jalpa Doshi
DATE: June 5, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Full Report |
Medication Use in Long-Term Care Facilities and Community Settings for Medicare Beneficiaries with Cardiovascular Disease
AUTHORS: Becky Briesacher, Jalpa Doshi, Bruce Stuart and Ilene Zuckerman
DATE: December 18, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Full Report |
PURPOSE: An important priority of the White House,
the Secretary and the Department of Health and Human Services is a reduction in
the over-reliance on unnecessary institutional long-term care and an expansion
of consumer responsive home and community-based long-term care options in the
Medicaid program. As a step toward addressing this priority, ASPE proposes to
develop a "primer" on existing long-term care options in Medicaid that promote
choices in long-term care for consumers. The primer is an important and useful
development tool for State Medicaid and aging policy and program staff,
consumers and their representatives, and providers interested in the expansion
of choices in long-term care, including the promotion of home and
community-based options.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Sara Rosenbaum, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC Lea Nolan, George
Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC Janet O'Keeffe, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC Gary Smith |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
November 2000 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Understanding Medicaid Home and Community Services: A Primer
AUTHORS: Gary Smith, Janet O'Keeffe, Letty Carpenter, Pamela Doty, Gavin Kennedy, Brian Burwell, Robert Mollica and Loretta Williams
DATE: October 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Medicare and Medicaid data have been used
to analyze service use and expenditures of various subpopulations. Yet
relatively little analysis has been performed on data from persons with
disabilities or severe chronic conditions, and even less on those covered by
employer-sponsored insurance plans. Such private sector plans play a key role
in serving persons with disabilities or severe chronic conditions. This project
investigates the choice of employer-sponsored insurance plans and use of
services by persons with disabilities or severe chronic conditions. Three
non-elderly populations are studied--active employees, their dependents, and
early retirees.
A methodology was developed to identify persons with disabilities or severe
chronic conditions by examining diagnoses from claims and encounter records of
insurance plans. This methodology was applied to data from two large employers.
Statistical analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting the
choice of indemnity or managed care plans. The effect of managed care on
service use and expenditures was estimated, after controlling for differences
in plan casemix.
This project also examined the performance of several risk adjustment models using
data from the two employers, using data on total plan expenditures, and also
separately for mental health services. Such risk adjustment models may help
employers and other payors compensate plans more appropriately for serving
persons with disabilities or severe chronic conditions. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Descriptive data on factors
affecting plan choice and service utilization are presented in the final
report. Although persons with disabilities or severe chronic conditions tended
to be more likely to select the indemnity option, the relative prices charged
for the indemnity and managed care options seemed to have a strong impact on
plan choice.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Ron Ozminkowski, The MEDSTAT Group, Ann Arbor, MI |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2000 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Private Payers Serving Individuals with Disabilities and Chronic Conditions
AUTHORS: Ronald J. Ozminkowski, Mark W. Smith, Rosanna M. Coffey, Tami L. Mark, Cheryl A. Neslusan and John Drabek
DATE: January 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Employment rates for people with
disabilities have remained low despite advances in legislation (especially the
Americans with Disabilities Act), the availability of technology which can
assist with everyday activities and work-related functions, and an increase in
positive societal attitudes toward the integration of people with disabilities
into mainstream social institutions. Only about 25 percent of people with
significant disabilities between the ages of 16 and 64 are employed. Most of
the policy research on the employment of people with disabilities has relied on
statistical data from national surveys. Detailed information on individuals'
experiences was needed. The goal of this project is to gather descriptive data
about public and private sector employment programs, examining successful
employment supports, and investigating factors that affect the ability of
people with significant disabilities to work. Focus groups, examining the
supports important to people with disabilities who are competitively employed,
will be conducted in three cities. The products from this study will provide
information to people with disabilities themselves and others interested in
improving employment opportunities for people with significant disabilities.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Gina Livermore, The Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
July 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Research on Employment Supports for People with Disabilities: Employment Supports for Individuals with Psychiatric Disorders
AUTHORS: Patrick Liedtka
DATE: September 4, 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
Research on Employment Supports for People with Disabilities: Summary of the Focus Group Findings
DATE: September 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Role of Health Insurance in Successful Labor Force Entry and Employment Retention
AUTHORS: Gina Livermore, Mark Nowak and David Stapleton
DATE: October 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Role of Supports in Successful Labor
Force Entry for Youth with Disabilities
AUTHORS: David Stapleton, Mark Nowak and Gina Livermore
DATE: September 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to review
survey elements for mental health and cognitive impairments that have been
utilized in population-based national surveys. The project will: (1) review
existing measures of mental disorders, cognitive or mental
impairments--distinguishing diagnosis from impairment and symptomatology--for
children and adolescents, working age adults, and the elderly to identify
common elements and their purpose(s); (2) document the validity and reliability
of the measures, as identified in currently existing sources, for the three age
groups; (3) calculate the prevalence identified by the elements within the
survey for working age adults and the elderly using appropriate methods; and
(4) determine the associations of these elements with disabilities in
activities of daily living, in instrumental activities of daily living and
other selected disabilities.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
William Frey, Westat,
Rockville, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2003 |
PURPOSE: As part of the 2001 Systems Change Initiative for Community Living, CMS awarded a grant to the CSHP at Rutgers University to implement a national technical assistance program called the Community Living Exchange Collaborative. ASPE intends to contribute additional funds to the 2002 CMS grant supplement specifically for the CSHP to provide technical assistance and design and conduct formative evaluations in 3-5 states that have recently implemented or are considering Nurse Practice Act reforms. The purpose of these reforms is to make it easier for Medicaid beneficiaries in need of frequent but routine skilled procedures to obtain such assistance both safely and cost-effectively in home and community-based settings.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov
Karen Tritz, CMS |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Rutgers University |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2005 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of the project is to inform
federal and state policymakers of some of the activities that have been
undertaken by some states to improve the quality of nursing home care. The
project will provide both a broad overview of the efforts undertaken by states
and a more detailed description of state quality improvement activities in
selected states. The project is intended to address the following research
questions: (1) What are the characteristics of state initiated quality
improvement programs? (2) What are the objectives of the state initiated
quality improvement programs? Are all facilities or only some facilities
targeted? What interventions do states employ? (3) How have states implemented
the quality improvement program? (4) What is known about the effectiveness of
the quality improvement program? In addition, the project will examine the
term, concepts, and relationships embedded in existing quality measures in the
domains of incontinence, pain, and pressure sores, and analyze their adequacy
to measure quality.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Alan White, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
May 2003 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to inform Federal and State policymakers of the status of state nursing home staffing ratio requirements in States that have either: (a) implemented or (b) established (but not yet implemented) nursing home nurse staffing ratios. The project will include a description of the following:
- Nurse staffing ratio requirements that have been established by various States.
- The issues States confront as they implement these requirements.
- The activities related to implementing nursing home nurse staffing (i.e., RN, LPN, and CNA) ratios.
- In those states that have implemented specific staffing ratios, each State's goals in establishing staffing ratios and the impact of these staffing requirements on quality and cost of nursing home care.
To address these issues the project will include the following activities: - Establishment of a Technical Advisory Group to review project products.
- A literature review to identify states with nurse staffing ratios and to describe how the rules are being implemented.
- Discussions with key stakeholders and officials at the federal and state levels about issues around nurse staffing ratios.
- A review of state policies on nurse staffing ratios.
- A quantitative analysis of the impact of minimum nurse staffing ratios on nursing home quality in several states.
The final report will synthesize what is known, based on the literature review, quantitative analysis, and stakeholder discussions, about (1) state nurse staffing requirements and their implementation, (2) state variability around key issues such as the goals of staffing ratios and their calculation, and (3) the effects of state variation on the feasibility of establishing federal nurse staffing ratios.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2003 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this task order is to
conduct a qualitative study that describes in detail selected aspects of four
adaptations to the Medicaid Fair Hearing process for beneficiaries enrolled in
managed care. The adaptions include evidentiary hearings, ombudsman programs,
external review organizations and expedited review of appeals. Descriptive
information will be gathered through case studies on the mechanics of each
adaptation and the perceptions of state Medicaid staff, managed care
organization administrators and advocacy organizations regarding issues related
to their use by Medicaid beneficiaries. A policy meeting will be held to
discuss the project's findings and the potential for using the findings to
improve the Medicaid Fair Hearing process.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Hunter McKay
(Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Beth Stevens, Mathematica
Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
November 2001 |
PURPOSE: To respond to the 2000 reauthorization of the Older Americans Act, ASPE and AoA will co-fund an examination that will serve as an initial framework for Congress and the Department as each considers the policy implications of financial exploitation. Through a synthesis of the literature, through consultation with subject matter experts, and through field research, the project will: (1) Develop a conceptual framework that can guide an operational definition of financial exploitation of older people (within the larger context of elder abuse) to begin to describe reasonable expectations for recognizing and addressing it where it happens. (2) Begin considering a national estimate of prevalence. (3) Identify and describe effective policies and approaches to identification, prevention and intervention. (4) Recommend future directions in policy and research for the Congress, federal agencies, state legislatures and agencies, and other groups.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC |
PURPOSE: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) that created the Temporary Assistance
for Needy Families (TANF) program allows states more flexibility in designing
their cash assistance and welfare-to-work programs than previously provided.
There is a general consensus that the significant caseload decline occurring
since PRWORA's enactment has increased the share of the remaining caseload that
is made up of recipients with significant barriers to employment.
This study, jointly funded with the Administration for Children and Families, will highlight critical issues in
the development and use of screening and assessment tools designed to identify
TANF and/or welfare-to-work (WtW) recipients who experience barriers to
employment. The barriers of specific interest for this study include substance
abuse, mental health or illness, physical/developmental disabilities (including
learning disabilities), and domestic violence. The project will provide
information about: (1) The screening and assessment tools used by experts in
the field to identify each of the aforementioned barriers to employment; (2)
The screening and assessment process states and localities are using to
identify and serve the target populations and how and why the states chose
particular screening and assessment tools; and (3) The linkage between
screening and assessment and referral to services, and the types of coordinated
services that are being provided to TANF/WtW recipients.
The contractor will conduct three main activities over the course of the project. First, the contractor
will review screening and assessment tools used by states to identify TANF/WtW
recipients with barriers to work and summarize and discuss the critical issues
related to screening and assessment. A series of regional conferences will then
be convened to provide an opportunity for federal, state, and local TANF/WtW
staff to share information on screening and assessment. And finally, site
visits will be conducted in 7-9 states to provide further information on how
screening and assessment is being implemented and services provided.
Information obtained through this study will be disseminated to states to allow
them to help state and local officials develop and refine policies and
practices regarding screening and assessment for barriers to employment, and
the referral and coordination of related services.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Terri S. Thompson, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2002 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Screening and Assessment in TANF/Welfare-to-Work: Local Answers to Difficult Questions
AUTHORS: Terri S. Thompson, Asheley Van Ness and Carolyn T. O'Brien
DATE: December 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full PDF Report |
|
Screening and Assessment in TANF/Welfare-to-Work: Ten Important Questions TANF Agencies and Their Partners Should Consider
AUTHORS: Terri S. Thompson and Kelly S. Mikelson
DATE: March 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full PDF Report |
PURPOSE: In the past few years, lawsuits against nursing homes have increased significantly, particularly in certain states, such as Florida and Texas. Both the number and average size of payments made to plaintiffs in these lawsuits, either through out-of-court settlements or through jury awards, have also increased dramatically. In most cases, settlement amounts and jury awards have been covered under liability insurance policies held by nursing homes and their parent corporations. The dramatic increase in liability losses in the nursing home industry has created considerable volatility in the nursing home liability insurance market. This volatility is evidenced by dramatic effects across the country--huge increases in premium costs, reduced coverage, many insurers electing to withdraw from the marketplace altogether, and some nursing homes finding it difficult or impossible to obtain liability coverage at all.
In September 2002, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) in the Department of Health and Human Services awarded an 18-month contract to The Medstat Group to conduct a study of trends and issues in the nursing home liability insurance market. The purpose of the study will be to inform Federal and State policy makers, providers, insurers, and consumer groups about trends and issues concerning nursing home liability insurance, and to describe possible policy responses to this problem.
The study will include the following activities: - A description of current trends and issues related to nursing home liability insurance through a review of published and unpublished literature, as well as discussions with key stakeholders.
- A detailed analysis of nursing home liability insurance issues in selected states through the conduct of in-depth case studies.
- A feasibility analysis of nursing home liability insurance data based upon the acquisition of information from nursing home providers and/or insurers/brokers on: (a) liability insurance coverage and costs; (b) liability losses incurred through lawsuit settlements and awards; and (c) nature of liability claims. The analysis will also assess the feasibility of linking nursing home liability insurance data with Medicare and Medicaid cost, quality, and payment data.
Study activities will be guided by a Technical Advisory Group comprised of individuals with expertise in nursing home liability insurance, nursing home litigation, nursing home quality measurement, and risk management. Stakeholders will include representatives from the nursing home industry, insurers, state insurance commissioners, consumer organizations, and the legal industry.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2004 |
PURPOSE: The study will identify federal, state and other regulations that are specifically applicable to health care providers and will calculate the direct and indirect costs they impose. Phase I will include: (1) a literature search to determine what studies on this topic have been conducted; (2) all logistic and administrative aspects of planning for and implementing a planning conference with health care economists, lawyers, and other experts; (3) the development of a proposed study plan; and (4) preparation of paperwork for any clearances needed for Phase II of the study. The literature search will review what economic studies of regulations have been conducted, and, more specifically, identify the existing knowledge base on regulations affecting health care providers, and on the direct and indirect costs and benefits of these regulations.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Daniel Durham, ASPE/HP Cille Kennedy (Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jacqueline Besteman, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: The Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics was established in 1986 by NIA in collaboration with NCHS and the Census Bureau. Staff from ASPE and other Departmental agencies became involved in the Forum shortly after it was established. The goals of the Forum were to provide federal agencies a venue for discussing aging-related data issues and concerns that cut across agency boundaries, facilitate the improvement of existing aging data bases and the development of new sources of information, improve the dissemination of information on aging-related research and data, and encourage cross-national research and data collection on population aging. In 1998, the Forum was reorganized and ASPE formally became one of nine principal members (the other members being NIA, NCHS, AoA, CMS, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, OMB and SSA). The explicit purpose of the "new" Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics is to foster collaboration among federal agencies that produce or use statistical data on the older population. Specifically, the Forum seeks to identify information gaps and data inconsistencies in aging data, improve both the quality and use of data, and encourage cross-national research and data collection on population aging. This intra-agency agreement transfers funds from ASPE to NCHS to partially support the work of the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Kristen Robinson, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: The rapid rise in Medicare hospice expenditures, particularly on behalf of nursing home residents, has drawn the
attention of a wide variety of health policy makers and the Office of the
Inspector General (OIG). The OIG has made recommendations to modify how
Medicare and Medicaid will pay for these services. However, a larger study is
needed to examine key hospice trends nationally and in selected states.
Additional information on the Medicare hospice benefit, including trends in
utilization and expenditures, who is covered, and where, will help inform
health policy makers as they consider alternative hospice benefit and payment
designs.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: A report is available synthesizing
the literature related to and summarizing discussions with key informants
regarding the Medicare hospice benefit, particularly with respect to nursing
home residents who elect this benefit. In addition, this report analyzes
Medicare utilization and expenditures for beneficiaries electing the hospice
benefit, analyzes and compares outcomes derived from the nursing home MDS data
for decedents electing the hospice benefit with decedents not electing this
benefit, and analyzes hospice coverage policy and utilization data from private
insurers.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Korbin Liu, Urban Institute, Washington, DC
Barbara Gage, Health Economics Research, Walthma, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
April 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Hospice Benefits and Utilization in the Large Employer Market
AUTHORS: Beth Jackson, Teresa Gibson and Joline Staeheli
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Important Questions for Hospice in the Next Century
AUTHORS: Barbara Gage, Susan C. Miller, Kristen Coppola, Jennie Harvell, Linda Laliberte, Vincent Mor and Joan Teno
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Medicare's Hospice Benefit: Use and Expenditures
AUTHORS: Barbara Gage and Thy Dao
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Outcomes and Utilization for Hospice and Non-Hospice Nursing Facility Decedents
AUTHORS: Susan C. Miller, Pedro Gozalo and Vincent Mor
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Synthesis and Analysis of Medicare's Hospice Benefit: Executive Summary and Recommendations
AUTHORS: Barbara Gage, Susan C. Miller, Vincent Mor, Beth Jackson and Jennie Harvell
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Use of Medicare's Hospice Benefit by Nursing Facility Residents
AUTHORS: Susan C. Miller, Pedro Gozalo and Vincent Mor
DATE: March 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This project synthesized what was known about: (a) coverage and payment policies for post-acute care (PAC); (b)
predictors of PAC use and nonuse and of the type, amount, and duration of PAC
use; (c) PAC utilization including characteristics of PAC patients, patterns of
PAC utilization, and geographic distribution of providers; (d) Medicare
expenditures during the course of PAC episodes; (e) outcomes of patients in and
across PAC settings; and (f) state policies designed to maximize Medicare PAC
coverage.
Medicare PAC services refer to a broad array of services provided in a variety of settings
ranging from PPS-exempt hospitals to the home. "PAC providers" include SNFs,
HHAs, and LTC and rehabilitation hospitals. In 1994, Medicare PAC expenditures
were approximately $24 billion--up from only $3 billion in 1986. Such rapid
cost increases have caused policy makers to focus considerable attention on
these benefits and question the underlying reasons for these increases.
The review and synthesis of the literature will discuss any historical issues, the extent to which these issues
remain, and any new issues that have emerged.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: Two reports have been produced: The first report,
Medicare's Post-Acute Care Benefits: Background, Trends, and Issues to be
Faced, provides background on post-acute care expenditures and
utilization, and Medicare policy changes that have contributed to these trends;
the supply and changes in distribution of post-acute care providers;
beneficiary, provider, and market characteristics associated with differential
post-acute care provider use; and issues that need to be addressed regarding
Medicare post-acute care services.
The second report, Interviews with Provider and Consumer Groups, and Researchers and Policy
Analysts, summarizes discussions with key stakeholders regarding issues
with Medicare's skilled nursing facility, home health, rehabilitation and
long-term care hospital benefits. Many comments were raised regarding the
impact of the changes enacted in the Balanced Budget Act on these benefits.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Korbin Liu, Urban Institute, Washington, DC
Barbara Gage, Health Economics Research, Walthma, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
May 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Medicare's Post-Acute Care Benefits: Background, Trends, and Issues to Be Faced
AUTHORS: Korbin Liu, Barbara Gage, Jennie Harvell, David Stevenson and Niall Brennan
DATE: January 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Post-Acute Care Issues for Medicare: Interviews with Provider and Consumer Groups, and Researchers and Policy Analysts
AUTHORS: Korbin Liu, Jennie Harvell and Barbara Gage
DATE: May 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Since the mid-1990s, a number of research
institutions initiated projects to assess how well disabled persons are cared
for in managed care settings. The research focused on many different aspects of
managed care and disability, and used a wide variety of research designs. The
purpose of this project is to: (1) synthesize recent research on the performance of managed care plans in caring for persons with disabilities, (2)
summarize research on current trends in enrollment of disabled persons into
Medicaid managed care programs, (3) recommend areas for future research, and
(4) convene a small research conference to explore the perspectives of other
organizations sponsoring research in this area.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Henry Ireys, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2001 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
How Managed Care Has Affected Working-Age Medicaid Beneficiaries with Disabilities and Chronic Illnesses: A Synthesis of Literature, 1995-2001
AUTHORS: Henry T. Ireys, Craig Thornton and Rebecca Dodge
DATE: February 8, 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to support
the development of programs and practices in states and communities that
provide people with disabilities of all ages and their families a broader array
of choices for meeting their long-term care needs. This project responds to a
gradual but persistent shift in the characteristics and nature of the long-term
care service delivery system--a shift from a system largely driven by the
supply of providers and services to one that is responsive to consumer
preferences.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brian Burwell, The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2002 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Compendium of Current Federal Initiatives in Response to the Olmstead Decision
DATE: July 10, 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This project will assemble a multi-state database on all persons who were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid at some point during 1999, and to use this database to perform analyses of the use of health and long-term care services by various population groups. The development of the Medicaid portion of the database is already underway. This project will link the Medicaid data with Medicare enrollment and claims data. Comparisons will also be made to Medicare beneficiaries who were not enrolled in Medicaid in 1999. Since a number of changes have occurred in recent years that have affected both Medicare and Medicaid long-term care services, comparisons will also be made to Medicare beneficiaries who were dual eligibles in 1996.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to use two major sources of administrative data to analyze: (1) how the type and extent of disability among nursing home residents varies across states; (2) how nursing home residents who are Medicare beneficiaries use various Medicare services; and (3) how the probability of admission to a nursing home depends on personal and environmental characteristics, including the presence of specific chronic conditions. The first analysis will be completed using clinical assessment data on nearly all nursing home residents in the U.S. The remaining two analyses will be performed using a randomly selected 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, merged with any clinical assessments that have been collected for those individuals. These analyses will help us better understand the determinants of nursing home use, especially the interaction between community care and nursing home admission.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Fu Associaties, Arlington, VA |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to assess
the accuracy and usefulness of the 1999 Medicaid Statistical Information System
(MSIS) data by performing three analyses: (1) an analysis of the
characteristics of Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care in all
states; (2) an analysis of the characteristics of Medicaid beneficiaries using
mental health services in one state, including the types of services that they
use and program expenditures; and (3) an analysis of the characteristics of
Medicaid beneficiaries who use long-term care services in three states,
including the types of the services that they use and program expenditures. The
accuracy of the data shall be determined by comparing them to existing sources
of aggregate data on Medicaid program expenditures. The usefulness of the data
shall be assessed in terms of their ability to describe enrollees in Medicaid
managed care plans, and users of long-term care and mental health services,
which cannot now be done with aggregate statistics.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Ann Cherlow, Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC |
COMPLETION DATE | December 2002 |
Last revised: February 25, 2003
WHERE TO NEXT?: DALTCP
Home | DALTCP What's New | DALTCP
Reports | About DALTCP | Contact
DALTCP | DALTCP Site Index
Outside Links | Acronyms | Glossary | FAQ
|